On one hand several of us were proposing far more than 2 a month, especially
those of us who did a lot of bug-finding - at 2 a month I'd personally save
for proposals that are "interesting" rather than bug fixes.  On the other 
hand, others of us weren't, and maybe a contract could automate folks making
some kind of benefit from their unused paper, and you're right of course -
it would be great to see if the Mills filled in the gap.  Also it was really
refreshing this week to see most of the action in straight-up gameplay
(auctions) without having to fix anything broken about them - So maybe we're
finally at a place where we'll be able to "just play the current rules"
without proposing so much!

On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> We all already get 2 paper a month, so I'm worried about reintroducing
> without objection and making mills worthless.
> 
> I'm gonna try and write a contract to coordinate the altruism but I don't
> know if it'll work.
> 
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > That is v. annoying.  I'm not feeling altruistic (I mean I might once, but
> > not against an ongoing defect in the rules) - I wonder how if people will
> > pay for bugfixes?  Anyway, I don't plan to pay to pend it - not asking
> > anyone
> > else to but feel free if you like :P
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> > > PAoaM amends 2445 by removing Without Objection as a method of pending a
> > > proposal. Want me to pend it with paper?
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I submit the following proposal, Paydays Fix, AI-2.
> > > >
> > > > I intend to pend it without objection (plenty of time before the next
> > > > payday).
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Amend Rule 2559 (Paydays) by replacing the text:
> > > >    e was not issued any Cards other than Green for eir conduct
> > > >    in that office
> > > > with:
> > > >    no unforgivable fines were levied on em for eir conduct in that
> > > >    office
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to