On one hand several of us were proposing far more than 2 a month, especially those of us who did a lot of bug-finding - at 2 a month I'd personally save for proposals that are "interesting" rather than bug fixes. On the other hand, others of us weren't, and maybe a contract could automate folks making some kind of benefit from their unused paper, and you're right of course - it would be great to see if the Mills filled in the gap. Also it was really refreshing this week to see most of the action in straight-up gameplay (auctions) without having to fix anything broken about them - So maybe we're finally at a place where we'll be able to "just play the current rules" without proposing so much!
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote: > We all already get 2 paper a month, so I'm worried about reintroducing > without objection and making mills worthless. > > I'm gonna try and write a contract to coordinate the altruism but I don't > know if it'll work. > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > That is v. annoying. I'm not feeling altruistic (I mean I might once, but > > not against an ongoing defect in the rules) - I wonder how if people will > > pay for bugfixes? Anyway, I don't plan to pay to pend it - not asking > > anyone > > else to but feel free if you like :P > > > > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote: > > > PAoaM amends 2445 by removing Without Objection as a method of pending a > > > proposal. Want me to pend it with paper? > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I submit the following proposal, Paydays Fix, AI-2. > > > > > > > > I intend to pend it without objection (plenty of time before the next > > > > payday). > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Amend Rule 2559 (Paydays) by replacing the text: > > > > e was not issued any Cards other than Green for eir conduct > > > > in that office > > > > with: > > > > no unforgivable fines were levied on em for eir conduct in that > > > > office > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >