We used to have more Patent Titles named in the rules, and different
officers were allowed to award them under certain conditions. We
dropped that on the grounds that the Herald could generically award
any of them when it seemed appropriate, but it meant the reasons for
some of the awards (e.g. Long Service) got lost from memory.
Should we re-implement? E.g.
The ADoP CAN award X months long service for X=3,6,9,12 when a
person without that title has served in a single office continuously
for that length of time.
The Reportor (alt: Herald) CAN award Bard w/2 support to someone who
publishes certain quantities of poems.
The Referee CAN award Scamster w/2 support to someone who performs
a major scam.
The Arbitor CAN award the title Sage w/2 support to someone who
delivers a particularly brilliant judgement.
Etc.
