ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 18:51 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
This means that any values that *are* provided will no longer
self-ratify into being correct, which seems far less than ideal.
R107, excerpt:
A public notice purporting to initiate an Agoran decisio
Mischief wrote:
On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Significant but not essential
(AI = 3)
[Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the
distribution until/unless ratification papers over it" to "Assessor
may get some Blots".]
Prom
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 18:51 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> This means that any values that *are* provided will no longer
> self-ratify into being correct, which seems far less than ideal.
Under the old rules, which worked for ages, they didn't self-ratify,
but the validity was def
On 7/13/25 16:13, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Proposal: Significant but not essential
> (AI = 3)
>
> Amend Rule 107 (Initiating Agoran Decisions) by appending this text
> after the last list item:
>
>The person publishing the notice SHALL also include any additional
>i
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 21:43 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > > Proposal: Significant but not essential
> > > (AI = 3)
> >
> > > [Downgrades e.g. fo
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > Proposal: Significant but not essential
> > (AI = 3)
>
> > [Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the
> > distribution until/unless ra
On 7/13/25 4:13 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Significant but not essential
(AI = 3)
[Downgrades e.g. forgetting to include class from "invalidates the
distribution until/unless ratification papers over it" to "Assessor
may get some Blots".]
Promotor? It seems wei
On 7/4/25 10:19 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Make currency current again
(AI = 3)
Should Hectares be fungible too (if that proposal passes)?
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Notary, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: ghostly
Bang holdings: 0
On 7/4/25 22:31, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>
>> On 7/4/25 22:19, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
>>> Amend Rule 2578 (Fungibility) by replacing this text:
>>>
>>> A fungible asset is
>>>
>>> with this text:
>>>
>>> A fungible asset (syn. "curre
Janet wrote:
On 7/4/25 22:19, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Amend Rule 2578 (Fungibility) by replacing this text:
A fungible asset is
with this text:
A fungible asset (syn. "currency") is
It might be better to just add a new sentence with a separate
definition? T
On 7/4/25 22:19, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Amend Rule 2578 (Fungibility) by replacing this text:
>
>A fungible asset is
>
> with this text:
>
>A fungible asset (syn. "currency") is
It might be better to just add a new sentence with a separate
definition? The synony
Edward Murphy via agora-business [2025-06-15 12:08]:
> Proposal: Rose-colored glasses
>
> If RadicalRose is not a player, then the rest of this proposal has no
> effect.
>
> Create 10 spendies in RadicalRose's possession.
>
> For each of the following assets:
>
> * 1 nix stamp
> * 1 Radical
On 6/8/25 3:26 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Agoriculture
As a reminder, Promotor is currently vacant, so if anyone's interested this
is a good time to step forward!
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Notary, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: ghostly
Bang h
On 3/3/25 07:00, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
>Transparent (T): A person qualifies for a Transparent Ribbon
>while the number of other types of Ribbon that that person
>qualifies for within the previous 7 days, earns within the
>previous 7 days, and/or was awar
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 05:13 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
discussion wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed the latter point just after sending the proposal. (I
> recalled there was a reason why it didn't work but not what it was,
> forgot to ask, and concluded I was mistaken.) I think the general case
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 23:49 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > I think this may be a bug in the Transparent Ribbon. It was intended to
> > trigger off events that could earn you a ribbon whether or not you had
> > the ribbon already, so that gaining ribbons doesn't get in the way of
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 23:54 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/2/25 23:49, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > As I recall, adding the "awarded" trigger was to make it work for Gray
> > ribbons.
> >
> > Also, the award doesn't affect it *in this particular case* because
>
On 3/2/25 23:49, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/2/25 23:45, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 04:36 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
>> business wrote:
>>> This was provoked by Mischief awarding me a Violet Ribbon just now.
>>> This was profoundly ann
On 3/2/25 23:45, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 04:36 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
> business wrote:
>> This was provoked by Mischief awarding me a Violet Ribbon just now.
>> This was profoundly annoying; I intended to leave it as long as possible
>> to award
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 04:36 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
business wrote:
> This was provoked by Mischief awarding me a Violet Ribbon just now.
> This was profoundly annoying; I intended to leave it as long as possible
> to award myself the ribbon, extending the period for which the Viole
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 17:50 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> ["inquiry case" is a historical term used throughout the rules; defining
> it here removes any ambiguity and helps answer a question that has been
> asked multiple times by newer places. Also, standardize casing to match
> mo
Thanks for mentioning tournaments!
#BringBackTheYellowRibbon!
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024, 2:20 PM Trigon via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 12/1/24 2:45 PM, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit the
On 12/1/24 5:19 PM, Trigon via agora-business wrote:
This would be almost entirely redundant because tournaments exist (and
are criminally underused IMO). The differences are just that tournaments
use regulations instead of contracts and that they award wins directly
instead of by way of victo
On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 22:01 -0500, Kiako via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (updated a very weirdly phrased part of
> the comment, no actual mechanical change):
>
> //
> Title: Gray Ribbon clarification
>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 4:23 PM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Also rule creation doesn't come with IDs until the rulekeepor assigns them,
> so I don't think it'd even work?
>
> --
> 4st
> putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
>
Crystals
Also rule creation doesn't come with IDs until the rulekeepor assigns them,
so I don't think it'd even work?
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 2:21 PM 4st nomic <4st.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Against! The purpose of crystals is to encourage rule
Against! The purpose of crystals is to encourage rule destruction, rule
creation is heretical!!
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 1:55 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
On 8/29/24 6:10 PM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
If crystal liquidation fails and this passes, that would not be good
I assume most voting against crystal liquidation would vote against this
too.
Or maybe folks want a tighter money supply
--
Mischief
Collector
Hat: steampunk ha
If crystal liquidation fails and this passes, that would not be good
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 21:42, Mischief via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 21:42, Mischief
via agora-business < wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> "Adjusting the Money
That is true. Should it be applied together with the other balancing change or
should the new change replace the old change?
- oliver.n
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 15:55, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 15:55, 4st
nomic via agora-dis
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:55 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I perform these actions, in this order:
>
> * I withdraw the proposal "Crystal liquidation".
>
> * I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
>
> Title: Crystal liquidation
>
> Adoption index:
On 8/29/24 03:49, Oliver Nguyen via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
>
> Title: Crystal liquidation
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: oliver.n
> Co-author(s): 4st
>
> Amend Rule 2685 "Crystals" by inserting the following text after the end of
> the rule:
>
> {
> Once
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Crystal liquidation
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: oliver.n
Co-author(s): 4st
Amend Rule 2685 "Crystals" by inserting the following text after the end of the
rule:
{
Once per week, a player CAN liquidate a specified crystal that they own by
announcement. Do
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:37 PM Oliver Nguyen via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Crystal liquidation
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: oliver.n
> Co-author(s): 4st
>
> Amend Rule 2685 "Crystals" by inserting the following text aft
On Sat, 2024-08-24 at 15:04 +0100, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I petition the Arbitor to republish this proposal with intent to
> qualify for a Baccalaureate of Nomic Art.
NttPF.
However, if you had actually petitioned as intended, I would respond as
follows:
I'm flattered you th
> On Aug 21, 2024, at 1:06 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business
> wrote:
>
>
> Title: Erosion in Geological Rhyme
> Adoption Index: 2.0
> Author: Kate
> Co-authors:
>
> Consider each player with one or more stone
... Okay, perhaps
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024, 2:31 am Janet Cobb via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Simplification, ironically
>
> Adoption index: 1.0
>
> Author: Janet
>
> Coauthors:
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 1681 ("The Logical Rules
On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 16:36 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
[snip]
>
> * With T notice: that intent is ripe, was created at least T ago, e is a
> sponsor of it.
There's a missing "and" here.
--
ais523
On 7/14/24 16:24, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Proposal: Pragmatic quarters
> (AI = 2, co-author = Mischief)
>
> Amend Rule 2555 (Blots) by replacing this text:
>
>At the beginning of each quarter, half (rounded down) of each
>fugitive's blots are destroyed.
>
> with th
On 7/8/24 16:46, Mischief via agora-business wrote,:
> On 7/8/24 9:01 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Please increase the complexity of the office to 1, if there is ever a
>> redraft. Otherwise, I'll petition the ADoP later, so its ok.
> I didn't include it in the proposal because complex
Mischief via agora-business [2024-07-07 10:35]:
>
> I submit the following proposal ("Potential Further Absurdity" AI=1
> coauthor=Janet):
>
> Create a rule entitled "The Veblen" with power 0.5 reading:
>
> The Veblen is a unique indestructible fixed asset.
>
> Ownership of the Vebl
On 6/28/24 03:10, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
> {{{
> Title: Ammo Store
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: snail
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Enact a new Rule with title "Ammo Store" and the following text:
>
> {
> Each player CAN grant emself 1 bang by paying a fe
how about a dodging mechanic? give everyone a speed value, or perhaps
they can buy bulletproof vests?
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 19:33, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 4:04 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 4:04 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I don't think that requiring 2 Bangs to kill someone will necessarily slow
> down the game once the match starts. We've seen that players (others and
> myself) can easily use Contracts
I don't think that requiring 2 Bangs to kill someone will necessarily slow
down the game once the match starts. We've seen that players (others and
myself) can easily use Contracts to prepare beforehand to set up automation
which can lead to very fast wins.
Perhaps a player could only shoot once p
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 5:24 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I withdraw my latest Proposal too, the one about Weapons. I was too
> excited, and sloppy. Although I still like the idea and would enjoy
> expanding the Bang game.
>
I think it's a great
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:34 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 06:55 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > A ghostly player CAN incarnate by announcement, which means
> > to flip eir Vitality to Invulnerable, provided ther
>
> The eliminated player has no obvious use for the granted bang, as it
> will be destroyed before they next become alive. Is this intended to
> give em something to trade with?
>
I believe so too, and I think that it's a good design because it gives
(dead) players something to keep playing the g
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 06:55 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> A ghostly player CAN incarnate by announcement, which means
> to flip eir Vitality to Invulnerable, provided there are only
> Invulnerable or Ghostly players.
[snip]
> When the match is reset, each player is set to Ghostly,
I like it.
" A ghostly player CAN incarnate by announcement, which means to flip eir
Vitality to Invulnerable"
I'd remove "means" from there and just use phrasing that already exists in
other rules, because I have the suspicion that it's very dangerous (or at
least, prone to bugs) to redefine the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:08 PM Jaff via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
> without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
> safer fix would be preventing a player wh
I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
safer fix would be preventing a player who holds an office from taking
actions corresponding to another office such that holding both would make
the
On 4/10/24 10:06, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> The Officeholder of Spendor is hereby flipped to nix.
>
> }
For bystander context, I consented to this.
--
nix
Arbitor
Huh. You cannot officially require the referee to investigate a non-player
via noting.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 12:14 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I create the following proposal:
>
> ---
> Title: yes, yes, I got the memo
> Author: Gaelan
> AI: 1.7
>
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:53 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> I suggest "un-noted" to prevent all instances of noting 1 infraction
> multiple times.
That doesn’t fix the original issue, as an infraction can be
investigated without being noted. And I don’t really think duplica
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:06 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
>> A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
>> committed by any other playe
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:07 PM Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> > Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
> > A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
>
On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
> A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
> committed by any other player in the last 14 days, specifying the
> incident and the rule it violates (or name of the I
On 24/03/2024 12:44, Gaealn Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, but does mean that if
>> there are any documents the Archivist deems worthy of archival (even
>>
> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:> *
> Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy
>> of archival.
>
> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, bu
On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:> *
Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy
> of archival.
hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, but does mean that if
there are any documents the Archivist deems worthy of archival (even
non-Agoran
On 3/17/24 15:08, nix via agora-business wrote:
> [Right now, sentences like "Blank are an asset ownable by..." is
> interpreted to adding to a default within R2576. This seems unintuitive.
> This proposal makes that default only apply if there's no mention of
> ownership.]
That doesn't belong the
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 2:10 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/28/24 14:04, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > A player CAN flip the Delegate switch of a specified office to
> > emself with Agoran Consent. If the Delegate switch of an office is
> >
On 1/28/24 14:04, nix via agora-business wrote:
> A player CAN flip the Delegate switch of a specified office to
> emself with Agoran Consent. If the Delegate switch of an office is
> set to "None", the holder of that office CAN flip the Delegate
> switch of that office to a specifi
On 1/5/24 01:42, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 01:40 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> * Inserting the following paragraph after the paragraph:
>>
>> {
>>
>> The basis of a person is the set of all persons that are (recursively)
>> part of em, in addition t
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 01:40 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> * Inserting the following paragraph after the paragraph:
>
> {
>
> The basis of a person is the set of all persons that are (recursively)
> part of em, in addition to emself. Rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding, a perso
On 2023-11-19 19:11, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> oh wait. Maybe this did work. This proposal IS up for vote. Lol!
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 4:09 PM 4st nomic <4st.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's lovely! Unfortunately, due to the arcane beaurocracy presented by
>> the Law of Agora,
On 2023-11-19 19:09, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> That's lovely! Unfortunately, due to the arcane beaurocracy presented by
> the Law of Agora,
> this proposal is not up for vote yet!
> The process currently in place is basically:
> Submit proposal (that's what snail did here) -> Promotor D
On 11/19/23 18:44, Goren Barak via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2023-11-19 16:24, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> //
>> Title: A simple fix
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: snail
>>
On 2023-11-19 16:24, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> //
> Title: A simple fix
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: snail
> Co-authors: nix
>
>
> [We tried to fix this back in April but it
I think the proper way to repeal anything is to tweak and break it so
subtly it's finally scammed, then you repeal it. That seems to be the way
things go. Or at least the fun way. Maybe we just need new stones, after
all!
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 7:52 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-bu
On 16/10/2023 17:37, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:> Adoption index:
>
> {
>
> The instance of the publicity switch possessed by the forum that can be
> sent to at "agoranomic at groups.io" is hereby flipped to Public.
>
> }
That's not a valid adoption index, and also you didn't give the
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 12:19 PM Juan F. Meleiro via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I create the following proposal, entitled “Game Theory”:
>
> {
> Create a Power 1.0 rule called “The Button” with text:
> {
> The Buttonmastor is an office.
>
> The Button is a singleton sw
Which is why you press the button every 144 hours that are reliable to you:
or setup scheduled emails. I feel like also this is similar to apathy but
now you have to track it: anyone can block as long as they press the button
fre. 2. jun. 2023, 12:29 p.m. skrev ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 14:18 -0300, Juan F. Meleiro via agora-business
wrote:
> I create the following proposal, entitled “Game Theory”:
>
> {
> Create a Power 1.0 rule called “The Button” with text:
This isn't really game theory, but "who has the most reliable Internet
connection / is best at bei
On 5/23/23 03:09, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> A player CAN, by paying a fee of 5 brights, turn a specified rule Radiant,
> provided its power is less than 2. Each referenda on a proposal that would
> amend or repeal a Radiant rule has its Adoption Index increased to 2, if it
> is ever
On 5/22/23 14:33, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-05-21 01:28]:
>> Changes:
>> - Generally cleaned up wording
>> - Handle rice at Lost and Found
>> - Harvesting a plan now grants rice before revoking (handling the case
>> where a person is in both the up and d
Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-05-21 01:28]:
> Changes:
> - Generally cleaned up wording
> - Handle rice at Lost and Found
> - Harvesting a plan now grants rice before revoking (handling the case
> where a person is in both the up and down sets)
> - Use "CAN" for enabling
> - Use a by announce
I think the main time-consuming activity in the Rice Game would be
navigating its particularly challenging endgame (how do you get that last
Rice? diplomacy? scam?), rather than grinding for large amounts of Rice.
Even if we do end up going with this, and you end up getting 4 Rice, that
last fifth
ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
th
This has been the best possible outcome
lør. 20. mai 2023, 11:07 p.m. skrev Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
> On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
> >
> > {Adoption index = 3
>
On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
>
> {Adoption index = 3
>
> [Stop making small changes to fix things. This security issue happens all
> the time.]
Exactly what non-small change would you want here? Your proposa
I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
{Adoption index = 3
[Stop making small changes to fix things. This security issue happens all
the time.]
Enact the following rule:"By default and unless otherwise specified,
assets, switches, and eir properties are secured at the power leve
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:29 PM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Or perhaps this is just a case of "the ais523 who has been following
> Agora for over 15 years spots things that the ais523 who had been there
> for only one year didn't".
Lol, I meant to add myself that the rules underlying may
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > That said, I suspect the word in R2029 is currently undefined: I don't
> > think "a definition that was in place at the time the rule was adopted"
>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-18 13:16]:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:51 PM nix via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > > CFJ: This violates Rule 2029 ("Town Fountain").
> > > I note and investigate the infraction to be 2 blots.
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> that it may fail is enough disclaimer to avoid no faking. I'll also
> note that Jane
On 5/18/23 16:08, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
>> violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
> Sufficient carefulness would be not inves
On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
Sufficient carefulness would be not investigating until the CFJ was
resolved, or your timer was al
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:52 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> >
On 5/18/23 14:51, nix via agora-business wrote:
On 5/18/23 14:43, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
CFJ: This violates Rule 2029 ("Town Fountain").
I note and investigate the infraction to be 2 blots. (and as we know,
this
investigation only occurs if it does indeed violate the rule).
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Having such an unwieldy amount of arcana puts a lot of power in being able
> to give out 'hedonistic' Judgements; ones that are heavily based on "well
> this is best for the game"/"this makes it playable"/etc, especiall
Having such an unwieldy amount of arcana puts a lot of power in being able
to give out 'hedonistic' Judgements; ones that are heavily based on "well
this is best for the game"/"this makes it playable"/etc, especially ones
that have to be that way because of ambiguity. Because we don't know for
sure
On 5/12/23 06:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
- Why would we make a special case just for Invisibilitating specifically?
What about other ancient things that may affect how other*current* things
of the game work too?
There might be. There's nothing that prevents us from looking
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 5:00 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business
wrote:
>
> - It takes agency away from newer players and puts more into older ones
> which are more familiar with this obscure ancient arcana which has now
> supposedly been made relevant, which feels terrible.
>
Just on this not
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:31 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/12/23 01:37, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > And about "voting strength games", any player could reactivate voting
> > strength on the proposal if they would vote against i
On 5/12/23 01:37, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> And about "voting strength games", any player could reactivate voting
> strength on the proposal if they would vote against it. Voting strength
> only matters when there's disagreement anyways, and if there is any, it'll
> get turned back
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:08 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/12/23 01:02, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > Each player CAN, with 2 support, flip an ordinary proposal's class
> to
> > expedited, provided it is in the Proposal Pool
1 - 100 of 1575 matches
Mail list logo
