On 3/2/25 23:49, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/2/25 23:45, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 04:36 +0000, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
>> business wrote:
>>> This was provoked by Mischief awarding me a Violet Ribbon just now.
>>> This was profoundly annoying; I intended to leave it as long as possible
>>> to award myself the ribbon, extending the period for which the Violet
>>> Ribbon would count towards a Transparent Ribbon after I Raised my
>>> Banner. Mischief also awarded a Violet Ribbon to several other people
>>> who do not yet own a Transparent Ribbon, potentially making it more
>>> difficult for them to do so in the future.
>> I think this may be a bug in the Transparent Ribbon. It was intended to
>> trigger off events that could earn you a ribbon whether or not you had
>> the ribbon already, so that gaining ribbons doesn't get in the way of
>> going for a Transparent – the bug is that if you don't have the ribbon,
>> giving yourself the ribbon resets the timer, thus making it count for
>> up to almost 14 days (if you award yourself the ribbon right at the end
>> of the time period) rather than 7.
>>
>> That said, it may be hard to come up with a succinct wording to fix the
>> issue, and some people may potentially consider the "bonus time" for a
>> new ribbon to be a feature rather than a bug.
>>
> As I recall, adding the "awarded" trigger was to make it work for Gray
> ribbons.
>
> Also, the award doesn't affect it *in this particular case* because
> Transparent can't be awarded within 7 days of Raising a Banner, and the
> lookback window is also 7 days. So, any events that count for
> Transparent must happen after the Banner.
>

Hmm, actually, it's true that it must be qualified for, earned, or
awarded after the banner is raised, but that qualification could be
based on earning a ribbon in the week before the banner and extend until
after it.

So it's not true that the underlying events for an earned ribbon must
happen after the Banner.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor

Reply via email to