sage-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Joyner
  • [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies julian...@fsfe.org
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies G. M.-S.
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies seb....@gmail.com
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies seb....@gmail.com
• [sage-devel] SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Nils Bruin
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Antonio Rojas
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
• [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Lorenz Panny
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Emmanuel Charpentier
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Michael Orlitzky
• [sage-devel] Urgent proposal: stop merging PRs without consensus, work on a way forward Dima Pasechnik
• [sage-devel] cat: logs/install.time: No such file or directory David Ayotte
  • [sage-devel] Re: cat: logs/install.time: No such file or directory Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3 henri girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Kwankyu Lee
• [sage-devel] Question about change_ring 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question about change_ring julian...@fsfe.org
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question about change_ring 'Martin R' via sage-devel
• [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect 'Doris Behrendt' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect G. M.-S.
  • Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect David Roe
• [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Vincent Delecroix
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals julian...@fsfe.org
• [sage-devel] source code tarball? John Cremona
  • [sage-devel] Re: source code tarball? julian...@fsfe.org
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: source code tarball? John Cremona
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: source code tarball? Dima Pasechnik
• [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath/sage] Restructure `sage.*.all` for modularization, replace relative by absolute imports (PR #36676) Dima Pasechnik
• [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package 'tobia...@gmx.de' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package François Bissey
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package John H Palmieri
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] Github workflows stopped working due to accidental "crazy" commit Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Github workflows stopped working due to accidental "crazy" commit Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Github workflows stopped working due to accidental "crazy" commit Kwankyu Lee
• [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini julian...@fsfe.org
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini julian...@fsfe.org
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Volker Braun
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] help menu in jupyter notebook Denis
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Denis
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Kwankyu Lee
• [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs julian...@fsfe.org
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs 'tobia...@gmx.de' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs jplab
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs julian...@fsfe.org
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] Bug in .subgroup? 'B. L.' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Bug in .subgroup? Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Bug in .subgroup? Dima Pasechnik
• [sage-devel] Problem with InfinitePolynomialRing 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Problem with InfinitePolynomialRing julian...@fsfe.org
• [sage-devel] SageMath version 10.4.beta1, Release Date: 2024-03-31 Henri Girard
• [sage-devel] Question about Morphism and SchemeMorphism (Issue 14711) Gareth Ma
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question about Morphism and SchemeMorphism (Issue 14711) Gareth Ma

• Earlier messages
• Later messages