On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 5:59 PM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a usual discrepancy between the univariate and multi-variable > case: the backends are different, and probably the functionality > is not implemented in the univariate backend (Flint?). > I gather it can be implemented using a resultant computation. >
I don't see why treat the univariate case differently with resultants. As the original msg shows, for `l=[x,x^2]` the univariate dependency is correctly computed almost surely with groebner basis. Observe that the algebraic dependency might be generated by several polynomials. This is an universal workaround for 1 var: just work over a ring with at least one more unused var. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAGUWgD8Ed6Zij%3DJ4FQOtBw_TDjUDGfjXW6Eyq2x%3D0xx16WbGyA%40mail.gmail.com.
