(a) Your point about "SageMath" being redundant is a good one. (b) Some people do not use either pronoun "him" or "her", and so "them" covers more options. (The use of "they/them" as a generic singular pronoun is common, at least in US academic settings.) (c) I think that the sanctions should depend on the actions which led to the blocking, in which case possible sanctions are already listed in the Code of Conduct. The new part is the potential response to a blocker who does not cooperate, and the proposed sanction is also new, intended to fit the situation.
On Sunday, September 8, 2024 at 8:50:13 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > All mentions of "SageMath" seem redundant and may be removed from the > paragraph. > > > ... If the blocked person does not cooperate, the committee may sanction > them. > > > "them" -> "him or her". What is the possible sanction? I think the content > of the sanction should be explicit and actionable as the blocker case. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7f2a6447-e8cf-42ed-bfa7-98872f37fbf5n%40googlegroups.com.
