perf-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2007/01/04 [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different Shreyas
• 2006/12/30 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different NIC? Eric Saxe
• 2006/12/27 [perf-discuss] Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different NIC? Shreyas
• 2006/12/15 Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/12/15 [perf-discuss] Re: prstat LAT - how to interpret Stefan Parvu
• 2006/12/14 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: File events notification mechansim Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/12/14 Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/12/14 Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. johansen-osdev
• 2006/12/14 Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. johansen-osdev
• 2006/12/13 [perf-discuss] Re: File events notification mechansim Richard L. Hamilton
• 2006/12/13 Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. johansen-osdev
• 2006/12/13 Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/12/13 [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Konstantin K
• 2006/12/12 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/12/12 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/12/11 Re: [perf-discuss] lgrp kstats Jonathan . Chew
• 2006/12/10 [perf-discuss] lgrp kstats Henrik Loef
• 2006/12/09 [perf-discuss] (no subject) Steve Peng
• 2006/12/09 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Glen Gunselman
• 2006/12/07 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Glen Gunselman
• 2006/12/06 [perf-discuss] non-zero service time w/o any I/O ? Leon Koll
• 2006/12/05 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/12/04 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret adrian cockcroft
• 2006/12/04 Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Jim Mauro
• 2006/12/04 [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Glen Gunselman
• 2006/11/17 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Joe Shaw
• 2006/11/17 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/11/17 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Bart Smaalders
• 2006/11/17 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Joe Shaw
• 2006/11/16 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/11/16 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Joe Shaw
• 2006/11/16 Re: [perf-discuss] File event API Prakash Sangappa
• 2006/11/16 [perf-discuss] File event API Joe Shaw
• 2006/11/10 [perf-discuss] Interrupt problem wrecking performance Snafoo
• 2006/11/08 Re: [perf-discuss] lock contention in ioctl() and scalability issues Krishna Yenduri
• 2006/11/08 Re: [perf-discuss] lock contention in ioctl() and scalability issues Bart Smaalders
• 2006/11/08 [perf-discuss] unsubscribe Edgar Alburquerque
• 2006/11/08 [perf-discuss] filebench fails with "flowop openfile1 failed on line 1" Atul Vidwansa
• 2006/11/07 Re: [perf-discuss] lock contention in ioctl() and scalability issues prakash sangappa
• 2006/11/07 Re: [perf-discuss] lock contention in ioctl() and scalability issues Krishna Yenduri
• 2006/11/07 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Free, Fair, & Open Benchmarking Josh Berkus
• 2006/11/07 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Free, Fair, & Open Benchmarking Michael Pogue
• 2006/11/06 Re: [perf-discuss] Process groups and process distribution acrossboards... Eric Saxe
• 2006/11/06 Re: [perf-discuss] lock contention in ioctl() and scalability issues Bart Smaalders
• 2006/11/06 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Yu Xiangning
• 2006/11/06 [perf-discuss] Re: Free, Fair, & Open Benchmarking Eric M. Mantion
• 2006/11/06 [perf-discuss] lock contention in ioctl() and scalability issues Krishna Yenduri
• 2006/11/04 [perf-discuss] CPU consuming Sh
• 2006/11/04 Re: [perf-discuss] Process groups and process distribution acrossboards... Michael Schulte
• 2006/11/04 Re: [perf-discuss] Process groups and process distribution acrossboards... Roland Mainz
• 2006/11/02 [perf-discuss] Re: Re: FileBench Discuss Youngjae
• 2006/11/02 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: FileBench Discuss Mike Gerdts
• 2006/11/02 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Jonathan Haslam
• 2006/11/01 [perf-discuss] Re: FileBench Discuss Youngjae
• 2006/11/01 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Yu Xiangning
• 2006/11/01 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel johansen-osdev
• 2006/11/01 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Yu Xiangning
• 2006/11/01 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Yu Xiangning
• 2006/11/01 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Yukon . Maruyama
• 2006/11/01 Re: [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Jonathan Haslam
• 2006/10/31 [perf-discuss] High dtlb-miss in kernel Yu Xiangning
• 2006/10/31 Re: [perf-discuss] LibMicro on SUN T2000 adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/31 Re: [perf-discuss] LibMicro on SUN T2000 johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/30 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: CPU saturation vs utilization Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/10/30 [perf-discuss] Re: ZFS Performance Question Richard L. Hamilton
• 2006/10/30 [perf-discuss] Re: CPU saturation vs utilization Sudarsan
• 2006/10/30 [perf-discuss] ZFS Performance Question Jay Grogan
• 2006/10/30 Re: [perf-discuss] Process groups and process distribution across boards... Eric Saxe
• 2006/10/30 [perf-discuss] LibMicro on SUN T2000 JPL
• 2006/10/29 [perf-discuss] Process groups and process distribution across boards... Roland Mainz
• 2006/10/27 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: CPU saturation vs utilization adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/27 [perf-discuss] Re: CPU saturation vs utilization Sean Liu
• 2006/10/27 [perf-discuss] CPU saturation vs utilization Sudarsan
• 2006/10/19 Re: (RMC) Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display Andrei Dorofeev
• 2006/10/19 Re: (RMC) Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/10/19 Re: (RMC) Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display Richard McDougall
• 2006/10/19 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/10/19 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display Richard McDougall
• 2006/10/19 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/19 [perf-discuss] Re: Prstat CPU display Cherian Abraham
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Interposing getpid() adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Interposing getpid() Dan Price
• 2006/10/18 [perf-discuss] Interposing getpid() Jason King
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display Mike Gerdts
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display Mike Gerdts
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display adrian cockcroft
• 2006/10/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display Andrew Wenlang Zhu
• 2006/10/18 [perf-discuss] Prstat CPU display Cherian Abraham
• 2006/10/18 [perf-discuss] Re: Why does -xhwcprof require compiling at -xO3 ? Alexander Gorshenev
• 2006/10/17 [perf-discuss] Why does -xhwcprof require compiling at -xO3 ? David McDaniel
• 2006/10/07 Re: [perf-discuss] Huge performance penalty going from Uniproc to SMP Roch
• 2006/10/07 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: NFS Performance and Tar Roch
• 2006/10/05 Re: [perf-discuss] how to interpret the prstat output? Wee Yeh Tan
• 2006/10/05 Re: [perf-discuss] how to interpret the prstat output? Bart Smaalders
• 2006/10/05 [perf-discuss] how to interpret the prstat output? anuradha moturi
• 2006/10/03 Re: [perf-discuss] Huge performance penalty going from Uniproc to SMP Dan Price
• 2006/10/03 Re: [perf-discuss] Huge performance penalty going from Uniproc to SMP Eric Saxe
• 2006/10/03 [perf-discuss] Huge performance penalty going from Uniproc to SMP Jim M
• 2006/10/03 [perf-discuss] Re: NFS Performance and Tar Ben Rockwood
• 2006/10/02 [perf-discuss] unsubscirbe Darshak
• 2006/10/02 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: NFS Performance and Tar johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/02 [perf-discuss] Re: NFS Performance and Tar William D. Hathaway
• 2006/10/02 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: NFS Performance and Tar johansen-osdev
• 2006/10/02 [perf-discuss] sell nike(AF1 JORDAN, DUNK, AIRMXA) bape, adidas shoes sugrirong
• 2006/10/01 [perf-discuss] Re: NFS Performance and Tar Ben Rockwood
• 2006/09/30 Re: [perf-discuss] NFS Performance and Tar Matty
• 2006/09/29 Re: [perf-discuss] NFS Performance and Tar Patrick
• 2006/09/29 [perf-discuss] NFS Performance and Tar Ben Rockwood
• 2006/09/28 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: SE Toolkit on amd64 anyone? John Martinez
• 2006/09/26 [perf-discuss] SAN Foundation tunables and performance Vic Engle
• 2006/09/25 [perf-discuss] Re: SE Toolkit on amd64 anyone? Dagobert Michelsen
• 2006/09/19 Re: [perf-discuss] HPC Devlopers? Eric Saxe
• 2006/09/19 [perf-discuss] HPC Devlopers? Brad Lewis
• 2006/09/12 [perf-discuss] Re: Re: 10GbE performance on "ontario" systems rick jones
• 2006/09/07 [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Can |recv()| be used on a pipe in Solaris ? Richard L. Hamilton
• 2006/09/07 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Can |recv()| be used on a pipe in Solaris ? Alexander Kolbasov
• 2006/09/07 [perf-discuss] Re: Can |recv()| be used on a pipe in Solaris ? Richard L. Hamilton
• 2006/09/06 [perf-discuss] SE Toolkit on amd64 anyone? John Martinez
• 2006/09/05 Re: [perf-discuss] Can |recv()| be used on a pipe in Solaris ? Alexander Kolbasov
• 2006/09/04 [perf-discuss] Can |recv()| be used on a pipe in Solaris ? Roland Mainz
• 2006/09/03 Re: [perf-discuss] FileBench usefull version Dominic Kay
• 2006/09/01 [perf-discuss] FileBench usefull version Antony Pavlenko
• 2006/08/22 [perf-discuss] Re: using >50% sys time Jürgen Keil
• 2006/08/22 [perf-discuss] using >50% sys time Tom Simpson
• 2006/08/17 [perf-discuss] Re: Problems with filebench on Solaris 8 Gordon Marler
• 2006/08/16 [perf-discuss] Re: Problems with filebench on Solaris 8 Kevin Maguire
• 2006/08/15 Re: [perf-discuss] Problems with filebench on Solaris 8 Spencer Shepler
• 2006/08/15 [perf-discuss] Problems with filebench on Solaris 8 Gordon Marler
• 2006/08/04 [perf-discuss] Code review for the NUMA observability tools Alexander Kolbasov
• 2006/08/04 [perf-discuss] filebench updates Timothy Butler
• 2006/08/01 Re: [perf-discuss] Changing Solaris kernel page size Steve Sistare
• 2006/08/01 Re: [perf-discuss] Changing Solaris kernel page size Alan Coopersmith
• 2006/08/01 Re: [perf-discuss] Changing Solaris kernel page size Holger Berger
• 2006/08/01 [perf-discuss] Changing Solaris kernel page size Raymond
• 2006/07/28 [perf-discuss] Redirecting output with bash scripting (gawk) Sinead
• 2006/07/20 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: default"-xarch"/"-xtarget" compiler flags in OS/Net... James Dickens
• 2006/07/20 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: default"-xarch"/"-xtarget" compiler flags in OS/Net... Keith Bierman
• 2006/07/20 [perf-discuss] Re: default"-xarch"/"-xtarget" compiler flags in OS/Net... Alan Coopersmith
• 2006/07/16 [perf-discuss] Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: ksh93 and default"-xarch"/"-xtarget" compiler flags in OS/Net... Roland Mainz
• 2006/07/16 Re: [perf-discuss] Solaris kernel is malloc()-happy / was: Re:ksh93/libshell+libast and portabilty /was:Re:[ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles Roland Mainz
• 2006/07/16 Re: [perf-discuss] Solaris kernel is malloc()-happy / was: Re:ksh93/libshell+libast and portabilty /was:Re:[ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles Roland Mainz
• 2006/07/16 Re: [perf-discuss] Solaris kernel is malloc()-happy / was: Re:ksh93/libshell+libast and portabilty / was:Re:[ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles Roland Mainz
• 2006/07/14 [perf-discuss] Re: is there a performance difference between /dev/poll David Pacheco
• 2006/07/13 Re: [perf-discuss] ksh93 and default "-xarch"/"-xtarget" compiler flags in OS/Net... adrian cockcroft
• 2006/07/12 [perf-discuss] ksh93 and default "-xarch"/"-xtarget" compiler flags in OS/Net... Roland Mainz
• 2006/07/11 Re: [perf-discuss] Solaris kernel is malloc()-happy / was: Re: ksh93/libshell+libast and portabilty / was: Re:[ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles Jonathan Adams
• 2006/07/10 Re: [perf-discuss] Solaris kernel is malloc()-happy / was: Re: ksh93/libshell+libast and portabilty / was: Re:[ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles Alexander Kolbasov
• 2006/07/09 [perf-discuss] Solaris kernel is malloc()-happy / was: Re: ksh93/libshell+libast and portabilty / was: Re:[ksh93-integration-discuss] comments on rev 287 makefiles Roland Mainz
• 2006/07/09 [perf-discuss] Re: is there a performance difference between /dev/poll William D. Hathaway
• 2006/07/08 [perf-discuss] Re: is there a performance difference between /dev/poll William D. Hathaway
• 2006/07/04 [perf-discuss] Re: Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Dustin Marquess
• 2006/07/04 [perf-discuss] Re: Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Mika Borner
• 2006/07/04 [perf-discuss] Re: Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Jürgen Keil
• 2006/07/04 [perf-discuss] Re: Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Mika Borner
• 2006/06/29 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: TLB lifespan across context switches Steve Sistare
• 2006/06/29 [perf-discuss] Re: TLB lifespan across context switches David McDaniel
• 2006/06/29 Re: [perf-discuss] TLB lifespan across context switches Bart Smaalders
• 2006/06/29 Re: [perf-discuss] TLB lifespan across context switches Jonathan Adams
• 2006/06/29 Re: [perf-discuss] TLB lifespan across context switches Eric Lowe
• 2006/06/29 [perf-discuss] TLB lifespan across context switches David McDaniel
• 2006/06/28 Re: [perf-discuss] MPO design review Andrei Dorofeev
• 2006/06/28 [perf-discuss] MPO design review Jonathan . Chew
• 2006/06/14 [perf-discuss] Re: RE: Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Dave Fisk
• 2006/06/13 [perf-discuss] Re: RE: Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Stephen Petersen
• 2006/06/10 RE: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Tanel Poder
• 2006/06/09 [perf-discuss] Re: Re: maxphys and sd_max_xfer_size Stephen Petersen
• 2006/06/09 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: File events notification mechansim Michael Schulte
• 2006/06/06 [perf-discuss] Re: File events notification mechansim Chris Rijk
• 2006/05/31 Re: [perf-discuss] Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Jarod Jenson
• 2006/05/30 Re: [perf-discuss] Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Bart Smaalders
• 2006/05/30 [perf-discuss] Need Some Advice Diagnosing Perfromance Problem Bill Rushmore
• 2006/05/24 Re: [perf-discuss] PowerNow! and monitoring tools Bart Smaalders
• 2006/05/24 Re: [perf-discuss] PowerNow! and monitoring tools Matty
• 2006/05/24 Re: [perf-discuss] PowerNow! and monitoring tools Bart Smaalders
• 2006/05/24 [perf-discuss] PowerNow! and monitoring tools Philip Beevers
• 2006/05/23 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Michael Pogue
• 2006/05/23 [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Mike Pogue
• 2006/05/23 [perf-discuss] Re: SUNWgnome-l10nmessages-extra soffice interaction Thomas Maier-Komor
• 2006/05/22 [perf-discuss] Re: SUNWgnome-l10nmessages-extra soffice interaction Thomas Maier-Komor
• 2006/05/22 [perf-discuss] SUNWgnome-l10nmessages-extra soffice interaction Thomas Maier-Komor
• 2006/05/20 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Andrew Gallatin
• 2006/05/20 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Michael Schulte
• 2006/05/19 [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC Chris Rijk
• 2006/05/19 [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Stefan Parvu
• 2006/05/18 [perf-discuss] Re: T2000, Solaris / Express (and SPARCbuntu ?) Martin
• 2006/05/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow Russ Blaine
• 2006/05/18 Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Proposal for in-kernel buffering of CPC overflow events Russ Blaine
• 2006/05/13 Re: [perf-discuss] File events notification mechansim Michael Schulte
• 2006/05/12 [perf-discuss] Code review for the NUMA observability tools Alexander Kolbasov

• Earlier messages
• Later messages