On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, curious wrote: > This conversation, though not directly, brings up some rather anoying > social standards/beiefs or whatever you want to call it.. When a women is > discovered to enjoy sex with multiple partners she is automagicly > classified as a slut.. by all genders involved implying by being the way > she is.. she has somehow lost a huge portion of her identity and > classified as an object... men who do the same thing are classified > as a womanizers... dude..it's not that he's into having sex with a variety of women. it's that he seems to assume that all women *really* want to have sex with him Vinnie _______________________________________________ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers B... Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers Battl... Susannah Rosenberg
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers B... Alice
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers B... kelly
- Re: [issues] "Female Hack... Terri Oda
- RE: [issues] "Female ... Kelda-Anne Sholdice
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers Battl... Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers B... Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] "Female Hack... curious
- Re: [issues] "Female ... Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] "Female ... Vinnie
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers Battle Se... Alexander Sendzimir
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers Battle Sexism... Kate Dornan
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers Battle Sexism [...... Otto
- Re: [issues] "Female Hackers Battle Sexism... Snarfblat
- [issues] At what point is it sexism... Jenn V.
- Re: [issues] At what point is it sexism... Alexander Sendzimir