On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 04:35, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:18:44PM -0500, Interservers Administration wrote:
> > McAfee SpamKiller(TM) Enterprise
>
> Yeah, but "killer" makes me think of some guy named bubba with a
> baseball bat. "assassin" is much more sexy. Like using it
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 06:09, Jeff Morton wrote:
> Which brings me to a question... what exactly did they purchase? If
> they purchased Deersoft, does that give them the right to enforce the
> trademark and prevent the open source Unix style SpamAssassin product
> from using that name? Do they
Nathan Neulinger said:
> The comment above the snippet causing the problem is dated Dec 27th
> 2002, so probably not.
>
> The waitpid loop was probably added to correct a zombie accumulation
> problem, but it had a more powerful effect than intended. It solved the
> zombie issue, but also preven
Hi
We are messing around at the moment with spam assassin as an smtp spam
scanner, it is working pretty well in conjunction with postfix. Postfix is
set up to read its transport lists from a mysql server, we thought it would
be good if spam assassin could be configured on a per domain basis with
Good morning.
Firstly, happy new year, thanks for the help in 2002.
Now the problem.
Whitelist in local.cf does not seem to be working.
Shouldn't the whitelisted address have 0 hits?
I have restarted the spamd PID, no luck
header below.
Received: from mogwai.mtnns.net (diana [209.212.109.209])
Due to the recent aquisition of DeerSoft by NAI, a competitor of ours, I
have to quit working on this project. I'll still watch the mailing
lists, but I won't be able to make any contributions due to this
conflict of interest. I feel really gutted about this, since I'm very
committed to open source
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 18:16, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Of course the downside is we probably lose two good developers, as the
> FAQ states that Justin and Craig will spend their time working on the
> proprietary side of things. Does that mean the NAI version is a fork of
> the open source version? Pr
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:44, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 18:16, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > Of course the downside is we probably lose two good developers, as the
> > FAQ states that Justin and Craig will spend their time working on the
> > proprietary side of things. Does that mean
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 20:40, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> They sell a service too. McAffee.com. In fact they even stole the idea
> off us (but that's another story ;-)
They do? Hmm..didnt know that. Then again,it's not like I browse their
site every, uh, year.
Can't say I'm surprised they stole the idea
Skye Poier wrote on Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:07:42 -0800:
> ^Tload: 0.03 cmd: perl 4643 [nanslp] 1.69u 0.27s 7% 13044k
> ^Tload: 0.03 cmd: perl 4643 [nanslp] 1.69u 0.27s 6% 13044k
>
I seem to have the same problem with a milter -> spamd solution which
only waits ten seconds for spamd to respond. Aft
How do I prevent white-listing messages with my own e-mail address in the
"From:" field?
C.S.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
__
Lars Hansson said:
> > And yes, it's 3 developers lost. Shame.
>
> Shame indeed but that's way it's gotta be, I suppose.
By no means -- bear in mind I've been working for Deersoft for ~4 months
now, and Craig for longer. Open source SpamAssassin is an incredibly
important part of the whole thin
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 15:25 CET Pat Patton wrote:
> Any email that comes in with a PDF file attached is flagged as Spam. The
> message header shows X=Spam-Status: Yes hits=0 required=0. I have the
> required set to the default of 5. System is Redhat 7.2, Spamassassin
> 2.43-2, Qmail 1.03. I a
Everyone seems more interested in the SA name than the project. Is SA
still a completely open-source project now or does NAI have restrictions
or plan on introducing restrictions. For example: if the open-source
project comes up with or adds some new algorithm of detection does that
automatically
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:39:43AM +0100, Maxime Ritter wrote:
> Can someone explain me what these headers are meaning :
> X-Spam-Warning: SpamAssassin ( http://www.spamassassin.org/ ) says this message is
>SPAM
> X-Spam-Score: 10.2 (**)
>
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.15 (www dot roaringp
Pardon my french, but this SUCKS. This is all the result of
sha^H^H^Hlawyers...
Are you sure that they can't differentiate between the OS project and the
commercial product? Yes, you'd be contributing to NAI's product, but you'd
also be contributing to my anti-spam efforts (which has zero to do wi
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> Due to the recent aquisition of DeerSoft by NAI, a competitor of ours, I
MS> have to quit working on this project. I'll still watch the mailing
MS> lists, but I won't be able to make any contributions due to this
This is indeed a bummer,
> > And yes, it's 3 developers lost. Shame.
>
> Shame indeed but that's way it's gotta be, I suppose.
Note: The following is a personal rant and is not indicative of any
organization's or other people's opinions, nor is it from my right frame of
mind :)
[BEGIN RANT]
I cannot disagree more with
Justin Mason wrote on Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:49:50 +:
> there are some patches now in the CVS version which do a lot of stuff with
> virtual users; might be worth taking a look.
>
I'm not too eager checking out the CVS version :-)
I think I have a similar problem with SA as Chris encountered. SA
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:12:50AM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> Everyone seems more interested in the SA name than the project. Is SA
> still a completely open-source project now or does NAI have restrictions
> or plan on introducing restrictions. For example: if the open-source
> project comes up
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 23:31, Steve Thomas wrote:
> Pardon my french, but this SUCKS. This is all the result of
> sha^H^H^Hlawyers...
Actually, I think it's a matter of money. Why should MessageLabs spend
time, money and effort to improve a product that NAI will simply use,
sell and make money on,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 07:31:49AM -0800, Steve Thomas wrote:
> Are you sure that they can't differentiate between the OS project and the
> commercial product? Yes, you'd be contributing to NAI's product, but you'd
> also be contributing to my anti-spam efforts (which has zero to do with
> NAI), as
This is a bug in qmail-scanner 1.15 that chokes on any largish
attachments, not just pdf. here's a quick patch that fixes the problem,
along with credit to the author (I posted this here a few weeks ago, but
here it goes again):
---
Basically, as of QS 1.1
Although it is nice to hear that SA is becoming that successful -
even global players like NAI are getting interested in it -, the
acquisition of Deersoft by NAI will change - and has already changed -
the community project which SA is.
SA is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself, this mean
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 15:40, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MS> Due to the recent aquisition of DeerSoft by NAI, a competitor of ours, I
> MS> have to quit working on this project. I'll still watch the mailing
> MS> lists, but I won't be able to ma
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 16:36 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[...]
> Back on track, is there any talk of branching off this project into
> another open source project with a different name, and continuing the
> open source building? I have seen this done many times, such as Neomail
> to Open Webm
This is happening to several emails coming from the SA-talk list today.
Any idea what's causing it? I'm using postfix for the mail server, cyrus
for the store, and pine to read the email. This is only happening to
SA-talk mail:
[Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding]
On 2003-01-07 10:12:50 -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> or plan on introducing restrictions. For example: if the open-source
> project comes up with or adds some new algorithm of detection does that
> automatically become NAI property which ends up in their commercial
> product (like bayes in 2.50)!?
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 16:46 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:12:50AM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> > Everyone seems more interested in the SA name than the project. Is SA
> > still a completely open-source project now or does NAI have
> > restrictions or plan on introduci
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:29:40PM +0100, Stefan Seiz wrote:
> Now since i did set report-safe to 0, SUBJECTS of tagged messages are no
> longer prefixed with "[Possible SPAM]".
> Is this done on purpose?
>
> How can i get back the behaviour of 2.43 which prefixed the subjects, put
> the report in
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:36:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I see this acquisition as a sellout. Plain and simple. And this comes from a
> guy who has seen his fair share of business deals, and been approached
> to "sell out" as well. Why do I say this? Because Mcaffee does not embrace
"My leaving the project is just a drop in the ocean."
That will send out ripples!
I think Your situation will be discussed more then you think. The idea of
this happening has a major impact on open source. What if NAI suddenly hired
Dan Quinlan, Justin and Theo? Then we go from major contributors
Hi,
spamc has no such restriction. All that needs to be done is increase the
size of the field in the MySQL database. We use it here with great success.
Regards,
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:23:44PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> continues. Nobody can buy an open source project and make it closed source
> without _all_ it's contributors agreeing on a license change. I for my own
> won't.
And the license change only effects new code. You can't relicense a
So... whose left?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
So if SA is still opensource and all the confusion is coming from the
fact that NAI owns the SA name and not the project tree, why not just
change the name. Everyone seems to be thinking that NAI owns the
SpamAssassin project now and will rape it and leave it for dead the way
they did PGP. I think
FYI, works just fine. We've deployed it here using the full email as the key. We just
made the field longer.
Small improvement to config would be nice if you could specify field names in the
config as well as the table name. Just so that we could name the field 'email' instead
of 'username'.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:59:58AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
> this happening has a major impact on open source. What if NAI suddenly hired
> Dan Quinlan, Justin and Theo? Then we go from major contributors to NAI
> taking a lot of the power behind an open project.
That depends -- if they hire
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SATalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Deersoft acquisition (thumbs down)
> I apologize for my rant being so long, and if I am wrong in my
> assessments (and I hope I am for the sake of t
I'm new to SA and not using the devel version 2.50 but 2.43, so maybe
this is already solved there?
Lately, we are getting a LOT of spam from a vendor which seems to
call itself HiSpeedMedia or HSM. They use several custom "list"
domains (f.i. hsm2282jende119283000send.com,
4list-11873649hsm987
Howdy,
I'm seeing some behavior with spamassassin -r where it's not removing
the bayes.lock file after it finishes the run.
I recently installed (as of 1/5) a copy from CVS (it passed all tests)
and turned on all of the Bayesian stuff, ran the learn scripts and got
it all working. I left auto_le
* Diffenderfer, Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-06 21:32-0500]
> Did anyone see in the NAI announcement that its first product (due in Q2)
> will be named...
>
> McAfee SpamKiller(TM) Enterprise
>
> And they had the "nerve" to trademark that! :-))) Don't even have to get my
> thesaurus out fo
SA is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself, this means a dual
GPL / Artistic license. The Artistic license permits to keep
modifications to the licensed code proprietary.
Gee, can someone make mods to SA and place them only under the GPL, and
thus create a branch of SA which is only unde
> FYI, works just fine. We've deployed it here using the full email as
> the key. We just made the field longer.
hmm, maybe I'll have to look into this. shouldn't be too hard to add
courier auth tool support to spamd so I wouldn't have to set up a
separate mysql database for this kind of thing.
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 04:21 am, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Due to the recent aquisition of DeerSoft by NAI, a competitor of ours, I
> have to quit working on this project. I'll still watch the mailing
> lists, but I won't be able to make any contributions due to this
> conflict of interest. I feel
Put the tears on hold. Put the knee-jerk in neutral. Put the soap boxes
away. Lay your weapons on the ground and step away slowly.
Nobody knows how this is going to shake out yet. It could be days, weeks,
or longer until the ramifications, if any, are fully known. Matt could be
back tomorrow.
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 17:13, Tobias von Koch wrote:
[...]
> A possible solution to avoid something like this happening to future SA
> code again is to change the license terms of SA.
>
> The LGPL, for example, would be a much better choice in my opinion.
>
> The LGPL would still permit commercial
I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with
guidelines that talk about opt-in/opt-out, how to know who you can send
mass mailings to, what kind of wording to use for the opt-out, etc.
Steve Evans
SDSU Fo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rose, Bobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example: if the open-source
> project comes up with or adds some new algorithm of detection does that
> automatically become NAI property which ends up in their commercial
> product (like bayes in 2.50)!?
Note that the
> "SE" == Steve Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SE> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
SE> get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with
You can't. Period. You will *always* get complaints about your mail
no matter what you do. No
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:15, Steve Evans wrote:
> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
> get in trouble for sending spam.
Simple:
- don't do opt-out. Never.
- Make sure the people receiving the mails really want this.
- *confirm* all e-mail addresses
- unsubscr
> "MSS" == Malte S Stretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> of the "what if 50% of all those uses of free versions actually paid us
>> instead"-kind; and suddenly they're using their slightly changed license,
>> or bruteforce lawyerpower, to make it damn hard to use SA.
MSS> I trust Justin and C
Does the aquisition of Deersoft by NAI mean that the key developers can
no longer contribute code to the open source project? Will they be
allowed to work on the open source code in work hours or will they just
work on the proprietary code? Does their employment at NAI restrict
them from coding in
Check this message (scroll down until you see tag!)
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mh1nj.bloomberg.com (mh1nj [160.43.164.207])
by bloomberg.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h06Neu520184
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:40:57 -0500 (EST)
Received:
Rick Macdougall wrote on Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:57:12 -0500:
> spamc has no such restriction. All that needs to be done is increase the
> size of the field in the MySQL database. We use it here with great success.
>
Thanks for both answers. So, this means, 1. MailCorral is the culprit handing
over
They've been doing that one-pixel-graphic trick for quite some time. BTW, it
scored 3.4 on the 2.50 SA that I installed today. Still not high enough, but
getting better, especially for something with very little actual message
content.
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mai
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 the voices made Malte S. Stretz write:
MSS> On Tuesday 07 January 2003 20:16 CET Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
MSS> >[...]
MSS> > What NetAss can do, via their employees running this project, is to
MSS> > change the license somewhat... which won't hurt anyone today, next week
MSS> >
Title: Plain Paper Stationery
Hi all,
I'm really new to this program
and list having just purchased the commercial version from Deersoft in
Mid-December. Recently I wrote to the Deersoft customer service folks to
ask HOW the program reports each users customized "blacklist" back to the
dev
Title: FWIW: SpamAssassin Commercial Ver. (Outlook)
Hi all,
I'm really new to this program and list having just purchased the commercial version from Deersoft in Mid-December. Recently I wrote to the Deersoft customer service folks to ask HOW the program reports each users customized "black
But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly because I adjusted
WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two false positives since I started trying
out SA a week ago. Both with mails from this list containing spam. What's the easiest
way to whitelist this mailing list? wh
But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly because I adjusted
WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two false positives since I started trying
out SA a week ago. Both with mails from this list containing spam. What's the easiest
way to whitelist this mailing list? wh
Everyone, please calm down!
The amount of confusion on this list is staggering. One very important
point that many people seem to be missing:
Network Associates did *not* buy SpamAssassin!
NAI bought Deersoft, Inc. Deersoft develops and sells some products, and
NAI now owns those. Deersoft'
On 2003-01-07 13:51:49 -0500, Jerry Rasmussen wrote:
> user. Does anyone have a suggestion on how best to accomplish this?
You could use procmail at the server.
Best regards
Martin
PS: _Please_ learn to quote.
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2003/
--
At Tue Jan 7 22:38:13 2003, Bolero (Kai Maillists) wrote:
> But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly
> because I adjusted WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two
> false positives since I started trying out SA a week ago. Both with
> mails from this list containin
Howdy folks,
--
DISCLAIMER
--
I searched relatively extensively through the documentation at
www.spamassassin.org, and I've conducted a few searches for "filter
subject" and the like on sourceforge's archive of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list, but so far I can't find an
answer to my q
all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have *@lists.sourceforge.net instead as I'm on a number of lists there.
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| Bolero (Kai Maillists)
| Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:38 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sub
Title: RE: [SPAM] [SAtalk] a very smart spammer. (score only 1.6)
I don't know much about the open source coding, but the commercial version had an option to "allow-recipient" ... maybe (following the example of your text below) something like whitelist_to ??? because lots of mailing lists hav
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:21:07AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Due to the recent aquisition of DeerSoft by NAI, a competitor of ours, I
> have to quit working on this project. I'll still watch the mailing
> lists, but I won't be able to make any contributions due to this
> conflict of interest. I
Yes and no. If there are patents involved, McAfee can excercise them to
stop entirely the distribution of anything but their proprietary
internal code.
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:36:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see this acquisition as a sellout. Plain and si
Good points. The only thing lost is some developers. Though hopefully
the SA community will work to make up. I am currently learning Perl,
and have been observing the project for weeks. Hopefully soon I can
start kicking in some code.
That's the only loss.
A name is just a name. If th
At Tue Jan 7 22:56:43 2003, Barry Jaspan wrote:
>
> Everyone, please calm down!
>
> The amount of confusion on this list is staggering. One very important
> point that many people seem to be missing:
>
> Network Associates did *not* buy SpamAssassin!
>
> NAI bought Deersoft, Inc. Deersoft d
At 02:03 PM 01/07/2003, you wrote:
Hi all,
I'm really new to this program and list having just purchased the
commercial version from Deersoft in Mid-December. Recently I wrote to the
Deersoft customer service folks to ask HOW the program reports each users
customized "blacklist" back to the de
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:03:23PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Check this message (scroll down until you see tag!)
The copy of this spam that I got scored 7.7 against my filters.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0
tests=CTYPE_JUST_HTML,HTML_PRE,MAILTO_LINK,ONE_PIXEL_IMG,
Title: RE: [SAtalk] NAI did not buy SpamAssassin!
Good point!
But I still have my question about how the addresses I've added to my "blacklist" can contribute to updating the spam filters database. Is there a particular address to which I can send a copy? or does anybody know a way to
There's a couple of ways you could do this. You could write a rule that
assigned a negative score, such as:
header SUBJECT_FOOBAR Subject =~ /FOOBAR/
describe SUBJECT_FOOBAR Subject contains FOOBAR
scoreSUBJECT_FOOBAR -100.0
OR...
you add a condition to your procmail recipe:
:0fw
*
Well, give a small score for "wealth" and "millionaire"?
How about a score for table cells with nothing but images, with optional
links? The more they try to paint a picture the higher their score.
Let's see... maybe:
/<\/td>/
/<\/td>/
Also, inside the Javascript, does "window.open" get points
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 09:31 am, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I'm new to SA and not using the devel version 2.50 but 2.43, so maybe
> this is already solved there?
[snip]
> HTML body which builds the message from images only.
The devel version has some improvements that will (hopefully) take care
1) How can I check to see if RBL checks are actually being made on my
system? I have the following in my local.cf
skip_rbl_checks 0
num_check_received 2
rbl_timeout 30
2) I have a file that is 1240 lines long of IP addresses and
domain/machine names that I have been wanting to blacklist. For
Hi,
1) Turn on debuging for awhile and watch the logs. I personally don't use
RBL lookups in SpamAssassin but rather do it at the smtp level.
2) Ever looked at rbldns by DJB ? I use it here for rbl.axess.com and all
spam I get gets their IP address added to it (excluding actual ISP mail
serve
On the unsubscribe subject, IMO, having the List-(Un)Subscribe/Help/Id: headers will
make it look less like spam.
Speaking of which, is this a spam check?
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:15, Steve Evans wrote:
> > I have a few users wh
Jonathan,
I don't know the answer to #1, but for #2 you should go here:
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/info/proctips.html for the answer, and more great
education on procmail.
--Tomki
At 12:36 AM 1/8/2003 +, you wrote:
1) How can I check to see if RBL checks are actually being made on my
system? I
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Steve Thomas wrote:
> There's a couple of ways you could do this. You could write a rule that
> assigned a negative score, such as:
>
> header SUBJECT_FOOBAR Subject =~ /FOOBAR/
> describe SUBJECT_FOOBAR Subject contains FOOBAR
> scoreSUBJECT_FOOBAR -100.0
>
> OR.
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> 1) How can I check to see if RBL checks are actually being made on my
> system? I have the following in my local.cf
>
> skip_rbl_checks 0
> num_check_received 2
> rbl_timeout 30
>
spamassassin -D < test.msg > logfile 2>&1
That syntax probably only
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 the voices made Copeland, Mary R write:
CMR> But I still have my question about how the addresses I've added to my
CMR> "blacklist" can contribute to updating the spam filters database.
They can't; SA doesn't focus on blacklisted addresses, instead it works by
looking at
Is there any web-based interface that users can use for configuring their
own Spam Assassin rules?
If not, is anyone interested in helping work on one?
(I saw some old postings from Charlie Watts and Michael Geier indicating
that they both have web interfaces.)
Jeremy C. Reed
http://www.b
Hi,
Yes there is. It exists for MySQL based users, squirrelmail regular users
and squirrelmail MySQL users. Check the archives for complete information.
If you have a specific need and you can't find it, email me off list and
I'll point you in the right direction.
Regards,
Rick
- Origina
I took the interface that someone (sorry don't remember who right now)
posted and modified it. The original was written in PHP and I rewrote it
in Perl, since I am allergic to PHP :), and added a bunch of
functionality to it.
The text of the script is here: http://www.victorland.com/rules.txt
Hi!
I have a problem with the headers generated.
I am running spamd (-d -r /var/run/spamd.pid -D -A x.x.x.x -i 0.0.0.0 -u
mail -x) from spamassassin 2.43 on a different host than the mailserver
(which doesn't have the "power").
Mailserver is a SuSE 8.0. Mails are being received by sendmail (8.12
I've attempted to install SA to work in conjunction with my smoothly running
FreeBSD 4.7 qmail box, but I initially neglected to install the Pod::Usage
perl module. When I ran a test using spamassassin it failed and gave me an
error complaining about this. I installed the module (Pod::Usage) and
Hello,
I’ve emailed the list several times in the last couple
of weeks, trying
to resolve a problem I had.
After MANY hours of reconfiguring my server, and pulling my hair
out, I’ve figured out what the
problem is. I’ve also reported it
to bugzilla.
However, I had an
admi
There's an easy solution to the hispeedmedia problem:
add these to your local rules
header HISPEEDMEDIA Reply-To =~ /hispeedmedia.com/
describe HISPEEDMEDIA Bulk email reply to found in headers
score HISPEEDMEDIA 5
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lately, we are
Any email that comes in with a PDF file attached is flagged as Spam. The
message header shows X=Spam-Status: Yes hits=0 required=0. I have the
required set to the default of 5. System is Redhat 7.2, Spamassassin
2.43-2, Qmail 1.03. I am not seeing this problem with any other type
attachments.
Hi,
using 2.5CVS from Dec. 29, 2002 i realized the new behaviour of
"report_safe" attaching the original mail to the report.
In order to have 2.5 handle messages similar to how my 2.4 installation
handeled them, i set report_safe to 0.
Here are the relevant local.conf settings:
required_hits 6
r
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 17:59, Chris Santerre wrote:
> "My leaving the project is just a drop in the ocean."
> That will send out ripples!
>
> I think Your situation will be discussed more then you think. The idea of
> this happening has a major impact on open source. What if NAI suddenly hired
> D
So I should have been more specific, this is a site wide install of
SpamAssassin using postfix. It is a front-end mail server that parses the
email and then sends to the recipient on our Exchange server. We would like
to prevent email marked as spam by spamassassin from getting to the end
user.
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 the voices made Theo Van Dinter write:
TVD> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:23:44PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
TVD> > continues. Nobody can buy an open source project and make it closed source
TVD> > without _all_ it's contributors agreeing on a license change. I for my own
TVD> >
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:06:13PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> I wish we could get more info from Justin or Craig to clear up
> everything. Justin's last message did raise some concern with the
> remark of "There's no closing of the source involved (except for their
> own (Deersoft now NAI) propr
One could argue that the whole point of open source it to use the community
to build and test your app.. then sell the product. Deersoft did it..
Cloudmark did it... the only difference, Deersoft sold the company.
I understand that the developers need to eat and what not... but I feel
like I was
Hi
I dont believe in goodbye spamassassin. Nai also aquired TIS FWTK and it's
still available under GNU Licence.
regrads,
philipp
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:15:18AM -0800, Steve Evans wrote:
> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
> get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with
> guidelines that talk about opt-in/opt-out, how to know who you can send
> mass mailings to, w
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
