On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 18:16, Matt Sergeant wrote:

> Of course the downside is we probably lose two good developers, as the
> FAQ states that Justin and Craig will spend their time working on the
> proprietary side of things. Does that mean the NAI version is a fork of
> the open source version? Probably. Does that mean my working on
> SpamAssassin is a conflict of interest (NAI is a competitor of ours)?
> Probably. I'll have to talk to my boss about that.

That could mean losing 3 good developers then?
Just out of curiosity, how'd you figure they're a competitor?
They sell a consumer product, you sell a service. Does that
make them a direct competitor?


-- 
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to