On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:44, Lars Hansson wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 18:16, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > Of course the downside is we probably lose two good developers, as the > > FAQ states that Justin and Craig will spend their time working on the > > proprietary side of things. Does that mean the NAI version is a fork of > > the open source version? Probably. Does that mean my working on > > SpamAssassin is a conflict of interest (NAI is a competitor of ours)? > > Probably. I'll have to talk to my boss about that. > > That could mean losing 3 good developers then? > Just out of curiosity, how'd you figure they're a competitor? > They sell a consumer product, you sell a service. Does that > make them a direct competitor?
They sell a service too. McAffee.com. In fact they even stole the idea off us (but that's another story ;-) And yes, it's 3 developers lost. Shame. Matt. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
