On Tuesday 07 January 2003 16:36 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[...]
> Back on track, is there any talk of branching off this project into
> another open source project with a different name, and continuing the
> open source building? I have seen this done many times, such as Neomail
> to Open Webmail. Since Mcaffee now owns this project, who is the lead on
> it? Who is willing to stand up and take it on? Where do we stand? What
> about 2.50? I raise these questions as the project, to me, is in a
> dangerous state, and could collapse if there is not some strong
> leadership on the future of the open source portion of SA.
>
> I apologize for my rant being so long, and if I am wrong in my
> assessments (and I hope I am for the sake of this project), please let me
> know. I have watched SA grow, and I would like to see the tradition
> continue.

It's mostly incorrect. SpamAssassin is still SpamAssassin, the Project 
continues. Nobody can buy an open source project and make it closed source 
without _all_ it's contributors agreeing on a license change. I for my own 
won't.

What has changed is:
* We lost three of the main developers (including the founder, Justin)
  (probably)
* We know that somebody big and evil will rape our project in future without
  giving a shit back to the community (very probably)

Regards,
Malte

-- 
Open Projects are made of Open Discussions.
  -- Me



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to