On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:21:07AM +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Due to the recent aquisition of DeerSoft by NAI, a competitor of ours, I
> have to quit working on this project. I'll still watch the mailing
> lists, but I won't be able to make any contributions due to this
> conflict of interest. I feel really gutted about this, since I'm very
> committed to open source (as people who know my other Perl work know),
> but I've never had something conflict with my job in this way, and so I
> have to face reality - this company just isn't going to let me give code
> away to a competitor.

I see your position, and I'm quite disappointed at where the project
seems to be headed.
 
> So I say goodbye - so long and thanks for all the fish.

I hope you stay in touch with us! Even if you can't do any coding, we
still will value your opinion in the form of suggestions or even moral
support :-)

> SA3 is a little more complex, since it's code I was working on alone.
> But sadly since this buyout happened before I could merge the code back
> into the main SA branch (and before SA2.50, after which I was going to
> do the merge) someone is going to have to take up the bat for SA3, or
> see it languish and die (though it will probably live on in a
> proprietary form here at MessageLabs).

> Luckily the code in CVS is the latest - I didn't really get chance to
> work on it over the holidays. Plus the code works - the only things left
> to do are integrate it back into spamassassin and spamd scripts, and do
> lots of cleanup, and re-merge all the rule changes from SA2.x.

I really hope we see this; hopefully someone will step up to the
plate. I was looking forward to SA3.

-- 
Duncan Findlay


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to