At Tue Jan  7 22:38:13 2003, Bolero (Kai Maillists) wrote:

> But it scored quite nicely and blocked your message now, possibly
> because I adjusted WEB-BUGS a bit ... ;-) Today I got the only two
> false positives since I started trying out SA a week ago. Both with
> mails from this list containing spam. What's the easiest way to
> whitelist this mailing list? whitelist_from doesn't work because it
> doesn't work on the envelope-from. Making a rule for another header
> like Sender?

I use procmail, and tell it not to bother scanning mail with a subject
line including "SAtalk".  In fact, I do the same for all the lists I'm
on since they're pretty much spam-free (and also my system is a 486/66
with 32MB RAM and scanning mail is very hard work for it!).

Martin
-- 
Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
- see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to