On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 the voices made Malte S. Stretz write:

MSS> On Tuesday 07 January 2003 20:16 CET Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
MSS> >[...]
MSS> >  What NetAss can do, via their employees running this project, is to
MSS> > change the license somewhat... which won't hurt anyone today, next week
MSS> > or even 3 months from now... but then someone at NetAss starts doing math
MSS> > of the "what if 50% of all those uses of free versions actually paid us
MSS> > instead"-kind; and suddenly they're using their slightly changed license,
MSS> > or bruteforce lawyerpower, to make it damn hard to use SA.
MSS>
MSS> I trust Justin and Craig enough to be sure that they'd never agree to do
MSS> something like this.

 All we know is that people can happily keep on working with SA as long as
nothing changes (like the license), and that at the first sign of trouble
people can just do a fork and "market" SA using a different name; maybe even
win a fight to be allowed to keep on using the name.

 If NetAss[*] tries anything I'm sure there are enough organizations out there
with enough money/lawyers to make them regret it.



[*] I will of course start calling them NAI if they ever plan on buying a
company from me. ;-)
-- 
      /\___/\                                              /\___/\
      \_@ @_/                                              \_@ @_/
 +--oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo--+
 | Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
 +---ôôô---ôôô--------------------------------------------ôôô---ôôô---+
     \O/   \O/      (c)1998-2003  [EMAIL PROTECTED]      \O/   \O/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to