gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: Mail Monitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] How do I confirm functioning of SA
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed SA on FreeBSD 4.7, I have started
What do you mean you started spamd AND spamassassin? What commands did you
run?
-Original Message-
From: Mail Monitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] How do I confirm functioning of SA
Hi,
I have installed SA
Hi,
I have installed SA on FreeBSD 4.7, I have started spamd
and spamassassin (both are in /usr/bin directory); i donot
know how to confirm functionality of spmassassin, there is
no extra header information in the received mail. Following is
my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file:
required_hits
At 09:10 AM 11/26/2003, Mail Monitor wrote:
I have installed SA on FreeBSD 4.7, I have started spamd
and spamassassin (both are in /usr/bin directory); i donot
know how to confirm functionality of spmassassin, there is
no extra header information in the received mail. Following is
my /etc/mail/spam
Actually, I realise now that my answer was to your subject line, and not to
your actual question. lol sorry bout that! ;)
-Original Message-
From: JC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:18 AM
To: 'Mail Monitor'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk
Check your incoming mail headers for "X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.XX" or X-spam-status.
-Original Message-
From: Mail Monitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] How do I confirm functioning of
--On Wednesday, November 26, 2003 7:40 PM +0530 Mail Monitor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed SA on FreeBSD 4.7, I have started spamd
> and spamassassin (both are in /usr/bin directory); i donot
> know how to confirm functionality of spmassassin, there is
> no extra header information
Hi,
I have installed SA on FreeBSD 4.7, I have started spamd
and spamassassin (both are in /usr/bin directory); i donot
know how to confirm functionality of spmassassin, there is
no extra header information in the received mail. Following is
my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file:
required_hit
> I'm new to the list, and I'm trying to figure out a way of detecting
> words with obfuscated characters (i.e. "@pp!3", "app13" = "apple").
You could try using popcorn, weeds, and backhair rules. You can get them
here:
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
Bret
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:11:25PM -0600, Michael Howell wrote:
> I'm more or less a newbie to Perl, so can you explain why your form is
> better? All I see is 2 distinct ways of selecting from a set.
Well, it's kind of a long discussion about backtracking and state machines
... ;) I'd recommen
Theo,
I'm more or less a newbie to Perl, so can you explain why your form is
better? All I see is 2 distinct ways of selecting from a set.
Thanks,
Mike
Computer Support Specialist
Oklahoma State University Physical Plant CIS
109 PPA Building
Stillwater, OK 74078
(405) 744-6993
> On Thu, Nov 1
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Howell
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm new to the list, and I'm trying to figure out a way of
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:33:28PM -0600, Michael Howell wrote:
> /(?:a|4|@)pp(?:l|1|!)(?:e|3)/i
ewww... at least do:
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> This will catch "@pp!3" and "app13", but it also catches "apple". Can
> anyone help me work the regex so it skips the word if it's spelled
> normally?
Michael,
The key is a negative lookahead:
/(?!apple)(?:a|4|@)pp(?:l|1|!)(?:e|3)/i
I've written a script that will help you create obfuscated phrase rules.
Check it out -- link in sig.
--
Chris Thielen
Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases:
http://www.sandgnat.com/c
Hi all.
I'm new to the list, and I'm trying to figure out a way of detecting
words with obfuscated characters (i.e. "@pp!3", "app13" = "apple").
I set up a test something like this:
/(?:a|4|@)pp(?:l|1|!)(?:e|3)/i
This will catch "@pp!3" and "app13", but it also catches "apple". Can
anyone
)
Subject: *SPAM* Score: 14.18 out of 05.00 required SUBJ:
[SAtalk] How do I filter something like this?
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail2.volition-inc.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this
the rawbody line above. Each line can not
wrap.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Brazee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:45 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SA Hits: 10.90] [SAtalk] How do I filter something
> li
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Brazee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:45 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] How do I filter something like this?
>
>
> I can't see any recognized words in this:
>
I can't see any recognized words in this:
There is
no other way to
enlarge
your
penis...
Please
STOP and
read if you
are
serious
and
interested
in gaining
length
and width to
your
penis!
hisuoadvycqsmb
rbnzokbewprt
Stop
buying
pumps and
doing
useless
exercises!
These
method
Tony White wrote:
The subject says it all. I know the defaults on this, and have not
changed them. I'm fairly certain that SA is autolearning spam --
because of the growth of the bayes_seen and bayes_toks databases. But
I'm not sure about ham at all. Currently, I'm not sending outgoing
mai
Title: Message
The subject says it
all. I know the defaults on this, and have not changed them. I'm
fairly certain that SA is autolearning spam -- because of the growth of the
bayes_seen and bayes_toks databases. But I'm not sure about ham at
all. Currently, I'm not sending outgoing mail
Hi Russell,
if you are using blacklists in the local.cf file you have to put the
whitelist_* over this line because if not won't work fine.
If you want you can take a look at my local.cf file in my site @
http://www.surestorm.com/data/SpamAssassin_local.cf.html
if you have comments just drop m
Can I set Spamassassin to not scan mail from specific domains? If I can how
do I set it to do so. I tried adding the domains to the whitelist in
local.cf in the form of whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc. This does not seem to work.
I am running Spamassassin on Solaris 9 Sparc
JJensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> line, in addition to the current tests performed on the body only?
1. use bayes, it can use funky spellings like this
2. add a rule:
header LOCAL_VIAGRO Subject =~ /viagro/i
describe LOCAL_VIAGRO whatever description you want
score LOCAL_VIAGRO 1.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 18 Sep 2003 04:32:28 -0600:
> How are you doing this black listed regular expression thing to block
> any and all ocurrances of the V word?
>
This is done by Sourceforge, not by the list.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
line, in addition to the current tests performed on the body only?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[E
the male organ waker upper drug? If I use the V word i'm blocked.
How are you doing this black listed regular expression thing to block
any and all ocurrances of the V word?
Original Message
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:54:51 -0600 (MDT
I use sendmail and spamd on RH Linux 8.0, Perl 5.6
Spamd starts prior to sendmail.
Services Start properly.
Server is in DMZ behind a firewall.
This server forwards emails to an internal server.
my users have been getting spam even after installing spamd.
want to know if spamd is really working in
Chris Halverson wrote:
> > The filter stores its files in $HOME/.spamassassin (unless otherwise set
> > up), you can look for those files and see if the database grows. Check
> > bayes_msgcount, it simply contains a period for each entry in the
> > database.
>
> I've run into this issue too. I ha
Leo Huang wrote:
[snip]
> Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> spamphrase_highest_score 38220
> Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: spamphrase
> 38220 temple kiff
[snip]
These would be due to invalid-in-v2.5x configuration lines in one of
your c
Jim Ford writes:
>On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:40:35PM +0200, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
>
>> The filter stores its files in $HOME/.spamassassin (unless otherwise set
>> up), you can look for those files and see if the database grows. Check
>> bayes_msgcount, it simply contains a period for each entry
At Mon Jun 30 17:59:21 2003, Patrick Morris wrote:
>
> The header will only appear if the message is near the low or high end
> of Bayes scoring. Your average message, which will have no Bayes score,
> also won't have a Bayes header.
If you to get a bayes score regardless, just put the followi
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:29:43PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> I'd noticed the periods in bayes_msgcount. Surely it's an odd way to keep
> a counter - I wonder why it's done that way.
that way the file size could be used as the message count (don't have
to worry about concurrent updates to the file,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:40:35PM +0200, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> The filter stores its files in $HOME/.spamassassin (unless otherwise set
> up), you can look for those files and see if the database grows. Check
> bayes_msgcount, it simply contains a period for each entry in the
> database.
I'
Chris Halverson writes:
>Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The filter stores its files in $HOME/.spamassassin (unless otherwise set
>> up), you can look for those files and see if the database grows. Check
>> bayes_msgcount, it simply contains a period for each entry in the
>> dat
The header will only appear if the message is near the low or high end
of Bayes scoring. Your average message, which will have no Bayes score,
also won't have a Bayes header.
Chris Halverson wrote:
I've run into this issue too. I have a user who fed (via sa-learn) a
few thousand messages to SA
Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The filter stores its files in $HOME/.spamassassin (unless otherwise set
> up), you can look for those files and see if the database grows. Check
> bayes_msgcount, it simply contains a period for each entry in the
> database.
I've run into this issu
Leo Huang asked:
> I installed spamassassin 2.55, and set use_bayes, file mode and bayes_path
> in the local.cf. How can I konw the bayes filter is running or not?
When the filter is just installed, it is in auto-learn mode, and will not
kick in until it has learned from 200 messages. This can ta
> debug: bayes: 27911 tie-ing to DB file R/O
> /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_toks
> debug: bayes: 27911 tie-ing to DB file R/O
> /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_seen
> debug: debug: Only 108 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200
> debug: bayes: 27911 untie-ing
> debug: bayes: 27911 untie-ing db_toks
> debug: bay
Leo Huang wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:01:31 +1000:
> How can I konw the bayes filter is running or not?
>
Use the spamassassin debuging option:
spamassassin -D < mail
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http:/
yes: 27911 untie-ing db_toks
debug: bayes: 27911 untie-ing db_seen
debug: Score set 1 chosen.
I think I need 200 messages to make it work?
Leo
- Original Message -
From: "SqM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:42
> Hello,
>
> I installed spamassassin 2.55, and set use_bayes, file mode and bayes_path
> in the local.cf. How can I konw the bayes filter is running or not?
Run the command "spamassassin -D --lint"
You will se a bunch of lines including bayes stuff..
Beware that the bayesian rules does not star
Hello,
I installed spamassassin 2.55, and set use_bayes, file mode and bayes_path
in the local.cf. How can I konw the bayes filter is running or not?
Thanks,
Leo
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data
filters work with the -q switch
as well, probably starting next month when I have some more free time.
Regards,
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Ho
En réponse à Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Looking at the bayes db it seems I have more than the 200 messages in
> spam
> > and ham categories required for bayes to kick in, however in the SA
> reports
> > I never se
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Clayton, Nik [IT] wrote:
> > But if there's a "man spamassassin", why isn't there a "man
> > spamassassin.conf?" There's a "man slapd.conf" and a "man
> > slapd.access"
> > etc. etc.
I agree, Tony. There should be a spamassassin.conf(5) man page.
> If your Perl installation
Thomas Kinghorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do I whitelist the postmaster address?
>
> I was thinking:
> whitelist_to_rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Any assistance would be appreciated.
Interesting. Instead of making up a new configuration option, I suggest
using one supported by SpamAss
> Even when people ask questions which are answered each week and are also
> covered in the FAQ, or questions where the answers are blatantly obvious
> (i.e. "How do I unsubscribe"), someone (usually Tony) answers them with
> a smile. :) Even if they're just directing the person asking to the
> r
| See? This is one reason that I want to leave.
|
| Everyone seems to *rude.*
If the people here seem rude, by all means stay away from the procmail list.
Your head is likely to explode if you join that one.
I've been on a lot of lists over the years - ISP, OSS, musical bands, bird
owners & watch
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Steve Thomas wrote:
> There's a couple of ways you could do this. You could write a rule that
> assigned a negative score, such as:
>
> header SUBJECT_FOOBAR Subject =~ /FOOBAR/
> describe SUBJECT_FOOBAR Subject contains FOOBAR
> scoreSUBJECT_FOOBAR -100.0
>
> OR.
ginal Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| Graham Freeman
| Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:35 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [SAtalk] How do I filter by subject?
|
|
|
| Howdy folks,
|
| --
| DISCLAIMER
| --
|
| I searched r
Howdy folks,
--
DISCLAIMER
--
I searched relatively extensively through the documentation at
www.spamassassin.org, and I've conducted a few searches for "filter
subject" and the like on sourceforge's archive of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list, but so far I can't find an
answer to my q
Yes, something addded it, but it wasn't SpamAssassin.
- Original Message -
From: "Drav Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Arne Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Decembe
Brian May wrote:
> Yes, something addded it, but it wasn't SpamAssassin.
Oh I agree, I'm just saying that the lad isnt imagining things ;)
D.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use you
Brian May wrote:
> The mail is being returned becase the address you are sending it to doesn't
> exist. or no route to the domain, or a misconfiguration on your system. It
> has *nothing* to do with SpamAssassin.
But the mime encoded mail DOES have a text/plain part with that message
"Our spam fi
n, or a misconfiguration on your system. It
has *nothing* to do with SpamAssassin.
- Original Message -
From: "Arne Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 9:25 AM
Sub
Arne Fischer wrote:
> "Our spam filter rejected this transaction." is generated by a program on MY
> side. I get a message, that this eMail couldn't be delivered.
Which was delivered to you because the bounce (being sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) was undeliverable, and the 'bounce of
a bounce' ended
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 06:55:07PM +0100, Arne Fischer wrote:
> Yes, that's true, but who generated the message "Our spam filter rejected
> this transaction."? It was a program on my side and as far as I know there's
> nothing else running than Spamassassin that could have generated it. So who
> se
>Well, whatever the issue, it's not spamassassin. According to the pasted
>message, your mail system blocked the message, then couldn't send the
>bounce back, so you got it.
Yes, that's true, but who generated the message "Our spam filter rejected
this transaction."? It was a program on my side a
> How are you using spamassassin? Is it behind some other filtering agent,
> like mailscanner, mimedefang, or something else?
> My hunch is that you're
> using mailscanner and you have it set to reject or bounce messages that
> spamassassin says are spam. If so, you'll need to modify your mailsca
How are you using spamassassin? Is it behind some other filtering agent,
like mailscanner, mimedefang, or something else? My hunch is that you're
using mailscanner and you have it set to reject or bounce messages that
spamassassin says are spam. If so, you'll need to modify your mailscanner
conf
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 06:25:01PM +0100, Arne Fischer wrote:
> "Our spam filter rejected this transaction." is generated by a program on MY
> side. I get a message, that this eMail couldn't be delivered.
Well, whatever the issue, it's not spamassassin. According to the pasted
message, your mail
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arne Fischer wrote:
> > I tried, but I couldn't really find out how to disable the automatic
replies
> > to spam. I receive many emails that tell me, that my email with the
content
> > "Our spam filter rejected this transaction."
> > couldn't be delivered
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arne Fischer wrote:
> I tried, but I couldn't really find out how to disable the automatic replies
> to spam. I receive many emails that tell me, that my email with the content
> "Our spam filter rejected this transaction."
> couldn't be delivered. But I do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arne Fischer) writes:
> I tried, but I couldn't really find out how to disable the automatic
> replies to spam. I receive many emails that tell me, that my email
> with the content "Our spam filter rejected this transaction."
> couldn't be delivered. But I don't want Spamassassi
I tried, but I couldn't really find out how to disable the automatic replies
to spam. I receive many emails that tell me, that my email with the content
"Our spam filter rejected this transaction."
couldn't be delivered. But I don't want Spamassassin to send mails.
Please help a stupid little idio
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:10:36AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> But there's nothing to point spamassassin to the AWL under
> /var/spool/spamassassin.
Back when I still ran site-wide AWL, I think I just made a symlink from
~spamd/.spamassassin -> /var/spool/spamassassin (or soemthing like
that). W
OK, I've done all the RTFM and still don't have an answer to this one:
spamassassin has command options for adding address to the AWL
(--add-addr-to-blacklist) and by default it will add that address to the
current users list (~/.spamassassin?).
spamc/spamd run as root or as whatever you specif
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:07:08AM -0700, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> Right now, we are running on a very "narrow pipe" (local ISPs suck), so I am
> trying to conserve bandwidth. How do I stop SA from checking razor?
score RAZOR_CHECK 0
or if you're using Razor2
score RAZOR2_CHECK 0
--
Randoml
Right now, we are running on a very "narrow pipe" (local ISPs suck), so I am
trying to conserve bandwidth. How do I stop SA from checking razor?
--
==
Robin Lynn Frank - Director of Operations - Paradigm-Omega, LLC
No attach
02, 2002 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How do I know if razor-checking is active?
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:35:18 -0500
Matthew Prentice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same question about whether Razor is working for our
> installation. When I run the s
Jan Korger said:
> Process sample-spam and you'll know. This is in razor's db.
Actually, sometimes it isn't. I don't know why. Also, reporting it
and then checking against it doesn't seem to work anymore. :(
The only way remaining seems to be to run with -D, and keep an eye out for
debug mes
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:35:18 -0500
Matthew Prentice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same question about whether Razor is working for our
> installation. When I run the spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt it does
> say Razor is detecting the message. However, when I run the message
> through
Well, it's a wide variety of IP's, but it is client-only type traffic. The
razor servers do not need to initiate connections to port 2703 on your
machine, so is there any significant risk in allowing your machine to
initiate client connections to any outside machine on port 2703 (provided
there
ing RedHat 8, Sendmail 8.12.5, SA 2.43, and MIMEDefang 2.24.
Thanks.
Matthew Prentice
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Henry Kwan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How do I know if razor-checking is act
At the command line run:
spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt
At the top will be extensive debug output including any problems reading
the rules file, any lack of DNS support, etc, as well as debug status while
running razor.
At 11:34 AM 11/1/2002 -0800, Henry Kwan wrote:
Hi.
Have been using SA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Henry Kwan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Have been using SA for a little while and with the 2.43 update, finally
> decided to install razor as well. But when I do 'make test', it reports
> back that both razor tests have been skipped with no r
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:34:06AM -0800, Henry Kwan wrote:
> run the razor-client, it appears to be working so how can I tell if SA is
> utilizing razor for checks?
Run spamassassin or spamd with -D. If you haven't turned it off, you
could also check your razor log file. :)
--
Randomly Genera
Hi.
Have been using SA for a little while and with the 2.43 update, finally
decided to install razor as well. But when I do 'make test', it reports
back that both razor tests have been skipped with no reason given. When I
run the razor-client, it appears to be working so how can I tell if SA
Frank Pineau said:
> >Won't this get overwritten with the next upgrade they install? Is there
> >a more elegant solution (local.cf or some such thing)?
>
> Welcome to the wonderful world of custom mods. :-)
wrong, I'm afraid!
anything in any file in /etc/mail/spamassassin will *not* be overwr
On 29 Oct 2002 09:41:08 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Won't this get overwritten with the next upgrade they install? Is there
>a more elegant solution (local.cf or some such thing)?
Welcome to the wonderful world of custom mods. :-)
---
This sf.net e
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 03:14, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Just grep for "http://spamassassin.org/tag"; in the installed .cf
> (configuration) files. Specifically, "10_misc.cf".
>
Won't this get overwritten with the next upgrade they install? Is there
a more elegant solution (local.cf or some such t
7;s coming up a couple of times a week.
St-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-talk-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Vincent
A. Palmieri
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] How do I redirect spam to /dev/
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:48:31PM -0800, Vincent A. Palmieri wrote:
> Now after running SpamAssassin for a period of time, I would like for
> the spam to be directed straight to /dev/null what is the method to do
> so?
I wouldn't do that (no way to retrieve false positives), but you can tell
proc
Now after running SpamAssassin for a period of time, I would
like for the spam to be directed straight to /dev/null what is the method to do
so?
"Pal Computer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Howdo I change the Body message as I want to direct our users to our
> own antispam home page and not http://www.spamassasin.org/tag?
>
> We will post our anti-spam policy and such at our own link, to avoid
> phone calls to explain the * SPAM ***
Howdo I change the Body message as I want to direct our users to our
own antispam home page and not http://www.spamassasin.org/tag?
We will post our anti-spam policy and such at our own link, to avoid
phone calls to explain the * SPAM * in the subject line.
TIA
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 02:30 pm, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:58:01PM -0700, Jeff Shepherd wrote:
> > I'm not a PERL programmer and not familiar with unix expressions, but
> > to show I'm willing to do some footwork, I think I need to add
> > something like the following li
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:58:01PM -0700, Jeff Shepherd wrote:
>
> I'm not a PERL programmer and not familiar with unix expressions, but
> to show I'm willing to do some footwork, I think I need to add
> something like the following lines to
> /usr/share/spamassassin/20_head_tests.cf
>
> hea
Perl regular expressions are a little different from DOS-style file globbing
patterns. The perl way of saying "match anything" is /.*/ not /*/ -- the "*"
means "repeat the previous thing 0 to infinity times" and the "." means "any
character". So /*/ by itself is meaningless and will actually gen
The majority of the mailing lists I'm on (such as SpamAssassin Talk)
have a List-Unsubscribe: line in the headers. How can I add a rule
that if there is a List-Unsubscribe: line in the headers, it lowers
the score?
I'm not a PERL programmer and not familiar with unix expressions, but
to show
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 08:07:35PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
| > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:
| >
| > > If there is such an RFC, how would I then use my personal email address,
| > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], if there is no m
> Are you sure? daf.2y.net just has an "A" record... I get mail just fine...
It will works also if you have only an A reccord, as the domain is a
real one and the machine a real one.
But with an MX reccord you would avoid to trigger the rule NO_MX_FOR_FROM
Olivier
_
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> > If there is such an RFC, how would I then use my personal email address,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], if there is no machine with that domain name assigned
> > to its IP address (it is a virtu
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Lars Hansson mused:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:44:31 +0100
> "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Also, I cannot stress enough: Use a caching nameserver!
>
> I presume you mean use a caching nameserver on the machine running spamd.
> Most setups will already have a
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:
> If there is such an RFC, how would I then use my personal email address,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], if there is no machine with that domain name assigned
> to its IP address (it is a virtual address)?
Even if there isn't a machine with an "A" record for khera.
> "CRH" == Craig R Hughes writes:
CRH> address. If they're actually sending from AOL, the RFC suggests
CRH> they should set the From to be @aol.com
What RFC would that be? If there is such an RFC, how would I then use
my personal email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], if there is no machine
wi
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Doug Crompton wrote:
BS>
BS> > What can I tell this person to do differently to avoid this?
BS>
BS> When using an AOL dialup to connect, reconfigure the user agent to use an
BS> AOL address as the sender. (AOL doesn't sell dialups without assigning
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Doug Crompton wrote:
> What can I tell this person to do differently to avoid this?
When using an AOL dialup to connect, reconfigure the user agent to use an
AOL address as the sender. (AOL doesn't sell dialups without assigning a
"screen name" that can receive email, do th
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Amusing concept. I suggest:
>
> :0fw
> |spamc
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> ! [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Amend of course for your own local representative and senators.
>
> C
>
What we really need is legislation
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
