Hello,
I use spamassassin 2.54 and just turned on bayesian filtering. I saved
over 1000 recent spams and hams and trained the filter on those emails.
However, when an email is scored with BAYES_99 it is only get a 3.0 from
that hit. I know I can maunally change the score of BAYES_99 but I'm
wond
At Fri Jan 30 22:33:27 2004, Kareem Dana wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I use spamassassin 2.54 and just turned on bayesian filtering. I saved
> over 1000 recent spams and hams and trained the filter on those emails.
Well, you really ought to be using a later version than 2.54. The
current version is 2
Hello PieterB,
Monday, January 26, 2004, 8:03:45 AM, you wrote:
P> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
P> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
P> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
My method:
1) I subscri
At 08:10 AM 1/28/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
My spamd is running as xadmin
xadmin 17057 1 0 Jan27 ?00:00:22 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -u xadmin
Do I need to run sa-learn as xadmin
If so, I could kick myself, I have been training it while logged in as
root...
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 January 2004 05:55
> To: Thomas Kinghorn; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes question: HAM
>
>
> At 02:10 PM 1/27/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> >While using spamd -D
I've got my bayes database files in a tmpfs filesystem and I wanted to
back them up every hour via cron so that I would have something to start
from in the event of a system crash, so I wrote a script to lock and copy
them and I decided to throw in a db_verify just to be sure I had a good
copy. Wha
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:56:39PM +, thomas fritz wrote:
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 112500
> debug: bayes: token count: 1215351, final goal reduction size: 1102851
Ok, so you want to keep 112k, and have 1.2m, for a reduction size of 1.1m.
> debug: bayes: atime to
hi there!
when running sa-learn --force-expire -D I get the following output:
synced Bayes databases from journal in 45 seconds: 48942 unique entries (85654
total entries)
debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 112500
debug: bayes: token count: 1215351, final goal reduction size
At 02:10 PM 1/27/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned as ham.
However, while doing a spamassasin -D --lint, it shows only 1 ham.
sa-learn --dump magic shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exim]# sa-learn --dump magic
I have attached the --lint debug.
An
;Matt Kettler'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bayes question: HAM
Sorry about that.
My spamd is running as xadmin
xadmin 17057 1 0 Jan27 ?00:00:22 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -u xadmin
Do I need to run sa-learn as xadmin
If so, I could kick
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:25:20PM -0500, Rick Mallett wrote:
> The issue is that bayes expiry is broken under some circumstances
> as evidenced by this listing of my bayes database area, possibly
> because its taking more than 10 minutes, or possibly because there
> is a bug in the code
Well, you
Perhaps I spoke too quickly when I suggested that the bayes
expiry code must be broken. I finally read David Lee's message
carefully and realized that the expiry code might be getting timed
out by mimedefang or sendmail and interrupted before it has time to
complete. I should have read it earlier b
The issue is that bayes expiry is broken under some circumstances
as evidenced by this listing of my bayes database area, possibly
because its taking more than 10 minutes, or possibly because there
is a bug in the code
-rw--- 1 defang defang32 Jan 26 12:19 bayes.lock
-rw--- 1
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:57:56PM +, David Lee wrote:
> The MailScanner maintainer, Julian Field, is very responsive, and he has
> already coded up an alternative way of driving SA from MS, so that its use
> of SA can avoid auto-expire (and thereby avoid the possible multiple
> simultaneous ex
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Rick Mallett wrote:
> [...]
> Now I've got a much bigger problem. The expiry is starting to take
> more than 10 minutes and as a result the journal grows to max size and
> an opportunistic rebuild kills the lock file and wrecks the expiry
> operation. Here is what I observe in
Hi List.
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned as ham.
However, while doing a spamassasin -D --lint, it shows only 1 ham.
sa-learn --dump magic shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exim]# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 26 January 2004 08:03 am, PieterB wrote:
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this l
On Monday, January 26, 2004 @ 8:03:45 AM [-0700], PieterB wrote:
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
Do you have access to proc
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:03:45PM +0100, PieterB is rumored to have said:
>
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
It depends on
In an earlier posting I pointed out that I had noticed that a
db_verify on bayes_toks frequently yields errors of the form
db_verify: Page 2289: hash page has bad prev_pgno
db_verify: Page 2110: hash page has bad prev_pgno
and I asked if I should just ignore the errors since bayes seemed
to b
On January 26, 2004 11:03 am, PieterB wrote:
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
>
> I did a "sa-learn --mbox --forget Mail/spama
Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
I did a "sa-learn --mbox --forget Mail/spamassassin-talk", which
removed the bayes learning for 99
On 21 Jan 2004 at 13:01, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:59, Jesse Regier wrote:
> > Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
> > each local domain or group of domains?
> >
> > It would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 11:59, Jesse Regier wrote:
> Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
> each local domain or group of domains?
>
> It would be nice to have something like...
>
> bayes_path = /var/spool/$DOMA
Is there a way to have Spamassassin use a seperate bayes database for
each local domain or group of domains?
It would be nice to have something like...
bayes_path = /var/spool/$DOMAIN_bayes
in the spamassassin.cf file. $DOMAIN would be replaced with the
domain from the current recipeint addre
At 12:37 AM 1/21/04 -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
My question, should
bayes ignore the habeas headers by default?
Perhaps not by default, but right now it's probably a good idea.
In general, any sudden shift of behavior from something commonly seen only
in nonspam to commonly seen in both causes troubl
Pedro Sam wrote:
I tried to remove the habeas headers mannually
You can get the same results by putting in your preference or
configuration file
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-1
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-2
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-3
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-4
bayes_ignore
Hi all,
I know everyone is sick of hearing about complaints about the habeas fiasco.
(I know I am) But ... a recent habeas spam landed as FN with a score of 4.8.
what's interesting is that it only scored a BAYES_50. That's because the
habeas headers had been learnt as primarily ham so far.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arpi writes:
>Hi,
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:21:06PM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
>> > http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning%20op
>> > tions
>> >
>> > bayes_ignore_header header_name
>>
>> ::bangs head on wall::
Hi,
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:21:06PM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
> > http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning%20op
> > tions
> >
> > bayes_ignore_header header_name
>
> ::bangs head on wall:: How did I miss *that*? Thanks for correcting
> my careless reading.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:35:28PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> Actually, it works quite well. Some people get more spam than ham to
> specific To addrs, so those become spam signs -- but once a ham arrives
> at those addrs, the ham signs outweigh the To spam-sign and redeem
> the mail.
In theory
This answer does NOT really relate to bayes!
But nevertheless to a typical 'out of memory'.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:43:30PM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I have also tryed to upgrade to sa 2.62 and convert the old db format to
> the new one but sa fill all my memory, and conseguently is kill
Hello, i was an happy user of Spamassassin untill some days ago
spamassassin started to eat all my memory opening the bayes database.
I was using spamassassin 2.55 with procmail calling it directly with
the -P switch, not using spamd and spamc.
My database is about 40 Mb and i have 256 Mb of ram a
Thanks for clarifying Justin!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:35 PM
> To: Larry Gilson
> Cc: 'Ross Vandegrift'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes mis-learning problem
> Larry Gi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Gilson writes:
> > In a broader sense though, shouldn't fields like To: be excluded by
> > default? It seems like if I receive more than 50% spam, this is a
> > receipe for disaster. Of course, some spam won't have a valid To:
> > field, but i
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Vandegrift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:07 PM
> To: Larry Gilson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes mis-learning problem
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:21:06PM -0500, Larr
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:21:06PM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
> http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning%20op
> tions
>
> bayes_ignore_header header_name
::bangs head on wall:: How did I miss *that*? Thanks for correcting
my careless reading.
In a broader sense
ns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#autoreporting
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-talk-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Vandegrift
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 2:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Hey everyone,
We're currently coping with a false-positive crisis that's
sweeping our email with 2.60, mostly due to scores of the Bayes filter.
We run SA site-wide on an incoming MX host, so individual users do not
have access to train the Bayes database. Moreover, our primary client
pro
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Billy Huddleston wrote:
> Are you all load balancing these? If so, are you doing it at the SMTP level
> or using SPAMD ? I'm getting ready to implement a 2 node system with
> qmail..and wondering if using a single SMTP machine calling spamc against a
> cluster of SA machines
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]:
> >
> > How's this holding up under heavy load with large clusters? How much
> > overhead for either the SQL server or SA?
>
> Having not written the code, and not being in a
Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]:
> > We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug
> for the
> > SQL rewrite for the Bayes code that's currently sitting in a bug
> report.
> > 'Tis definitely multi-host safe, and 'twould make my life easier...
>
> H
hines
with qmail and spamd all running on the same machine..
Thanks, Billy
- Original Message -
From: "Damian Gerow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?
> Thus spake Rocky Ol
at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
> > I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> > doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
>
> We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug
for t
On 15 Jan 2004, Rocky Olsen wrote:
> I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
>
>
> On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 13:31, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition
> > with a syst
te:
> Date: 15 Jan 2004 14:37:47 -0700
> From: Rocky Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?
>
> I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> doing Spa
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
> > I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> > doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
>
> We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another
Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
> I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug for the
SQL rewrite for the Bayes code that's currently
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 13:31, Mike Jackson wrote:
> If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition
> with a system-wide Bayesian database and share it across al
If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition
with a system-wide Bayesian database and share it across all the boxes? In
our setup, we have three boxes dedicated to doing SA filtering, all running
the same version of FreeBSD, and it sure would be nice to be able to do
Hey all,
Got a question about Bayes. I have run into this a few times now and not
sure what is causing it.
When I run a sa-learn command, if I am training something or maintenance, I
get this error:
Cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/MailScanner/spamassassin/bayes_* R/O:
tie failed: I
nappro
> small chastising rant: Subject lines exist for a reason, on high volume
> lists, please use them. "no subject" makes you look lazy and/or lacking in
> inteligence, usualy both.
>
Actually I was suffering from temporary (I hope) stupidity... My bad...
Sorry :)
> At 05:05 PM 1/14/2004, Christop
On January 14, 2004 12:07 pm, Paul Barbeau wrote:
> Has anyone create a button (or some other way) that i can install on a
> client outlook that will submit the email to the my bayes learning account?
> The current process to "resend the message" is above most of my users and
> button would be much
small chastising rant: Subject lines exist for a reason, on high volume
lists, please use them. "no subject" makes you look lazy and/or lacking in
inteligence, usualy both.
At 05:05 PM 1/14/2004, Christopher Tarricone wrote:
It seems to me that SpamAssassing is running as the user vpopmail so
> If you think some tokens should be "stronger" than others, please do a
> 10-fold cross-validation testing run which should *prove* that to be the
> case. We don't adopt Bayes tokenizer or combiner changes without
> such testing.
considering I have no idea how to do this or where to even be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Petersen writes:
>> See 'man sa-learn' or use
>> http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/sa-learn.html
>> http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/BayesInSpamAssassin
>
>This doesn't say much about HOW it's used in SA, though. For instance,
>does SA bayes score
> See 'man sa-learn' or use
> http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/sa-learn.html
> http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/BayesInSpamAssassin
This doesn't say much about HOW it's used in SA, though. For instance,
does SA bayes score URI tokens higher than it does general body tokens?
(if not, it should) Wha
Has anyone create a button (or some other way) that i can install on a
client outlook that will submit the email to the my bayes learning account?
The current process to "resend the message" is above most of my users and
button would be much easier.
Thanks for any help
Paul
-
check the links at
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Bayes.html
/robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carles
Xavier Munyoz Baldó
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2004 11:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes.
Hi
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:14:51AM +0100, Carles Xavier Munyoz Bald? wrote:
> Hi,
> May someone explain me in few words what is the Bayes probability algorithm
> and how is it used in SpamAssassin ?
See 'man sa-learn' or use
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/sa-learn.html
http://wiki.spamassassin.o
Hi,
May someone explain me in few words what is the Bayes probability algorithm
and how is it used in SpamAssassin ?
Greetings.
---
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.unlimitedmail.net/
---
---
This SF.net email is sponso
Hi,
something seems to be wrong with my bayes db, or is this considered
'normal'? Log:
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? yes
debug: Running in taint mode, removing unsafe env vars, and resetting
PATH
debug: PATH included '/opt/perl/bin', keeping.
debug: PATH included '/bin'
Hello Kevin,
Friday, January 9, 2004, 4:56:54 PM, you wrote:
KR> Once I have run the sa-learn routine on a group of thousands of messages, is
KR> it necessary to keep all of those messages to run the next time I run
KR> sa-learn? It takes a while for sa-learn to process thousands of message so
K
Once I have run the sa-learn routine on a group of thousands of messages, is
it necessary to keep all of those messages to run the next time I run
sa-learn? It takes a while for sa-learn to process thousands of message so
I was wondering if I only ran sa-learn on the new hand sorted messages,
woul
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:51:45PM -0600, Kevin Roberts wrote:
> Is there a way to tell the bayes learning system to forget everything and
> start over from a clean corpus sa-learn session? The reason I ask is I may
> have many emails that were auto posted and learned that were learned the
> wrong
Is there a way to tell the bayes learning system to forget everything and
start over from a clean corpus sa-learn session? The reason I ask is I may
have many emails that were auto posted and learned that were learned the
wrong way.
I have 2.55 ver
Thanks
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:09:32AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> i am getting the following bayes error when trying to do a
> force-expire. Is there any way around this so i can expire my old
> tokens?
>
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 75
> debug: bayes: token count: 0,
Hello,
i am getting the following bayes error when trying to do a
force-expire. Is there any way around this so i can expire my old
tokens?
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 2
synced Bayes databases from journal in 0 seconds: 569 unique entries
(569 total entries)
debug: bayes: expiry chec
That's OK then.
What probably made it more confusing was that I put them in to a dir called
bayes.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 January 2004 19:34
To: Alan Munday; 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Baye
At 02:12 PM 1/6/2004, Alan Munday wrote:
And testing with bayes_path /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes/bayes worked fine.
From reading the docs, I don't think this is how this is supposed to work.
But it works.
No, from reading the docs it's EXACTLY how it should work.
It's a bit confusing, since the
Just in case this this is not common knowledge...
I moved to using a site-wide bayes DB this week.
In doing so I needed to set the following in my local.cf:
bayes_path /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
The odd bit for me was that I expected the path to be:
/var/spool/spamassass
Since you're using bayes do you get the same errors when you try to use
sa-learn?
If this was me I'd simply run sa-learn in the perl debugger and debug
how the bayesstore is being written.
I don't think your problem is spamd specific.
On Dec 19, 2003, at 3:06 AM, Lukreme wrote:
I make sure th
>> Can anyone give me a clue as to how to resolve this?
> Looks like you need to Install BerkeleyDB first... DB::File requires
it.
> Once you get those two loaded, bayes should work for ya.
Yep, the problem was that SA was looking for /usr/local/BerkeleyDB and
the sun "addpkg" was creating it
At 04:23 PM 12/19/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
Can anyone give me a clue as to how to resolve this?
Looks like you need to Install BerkeleyDB first... DB::File requires it.
Once you get those two loaded, bayes should work for ya.
---
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:23:36PM -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
> When I try to install DB_File using cpan I get
>
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
>
> Can anyone give me a clue as to how to resolve this?
Install the Berkeley DB libraries and development files. see your OS
ve
Hi all,
I was perusing my procmail log file and have found that for some reason
since I upgraded to 2.60 bayes has been disabled. I turned on verbose
logging and saw the following
procmail: Match on "< 256000"
procmail: Locking "/var/lock/spamassassin.lock"
procmail: Executing "spamassassin,-D"
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:06:13AM -0700, Lukreme wrote:
> Now, somehow after processing a single message spamd has set the perms
> on the bayes_journal file to --
What is "bayes_file_mode" set to? By default it's 0700.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
If you want to program in C, progra
I make sure the permission on my bayes files are 644. I restart spamd.
I tail the maillog
$ psa spamd
root61393 0.0 13.6 21968 16912 ?? Is1:20AM 0:00.90
/usr/local/bin/spamd -a -c -d (perl)
First message comes in and is processed by spamd just fine.
Dec 19 01:29:09 mail spamd[61
25
To
Alexei Moulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [SAtalk] bayes not being
used
Alexei Moulton wrote:
>I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
>
>The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and
also
>the bayes s
Alexei Moulton wrote:
I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and also
the bayes score from _BAYES_ is always 0.5000. From this i gather that the
bayes database is not being used?
not sure exactly what spamassassin
I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and also
the bayes score from _BAYES_ is always 0.5000. From this i gather that the
bayes database is not being used?
not sure exactly what spamassassin -D --lint is showing m
At 05:42 AM 12/16/03 -0800, James Nonya wrote:
Dec 16 06:39:54 gateway spamd[9846]: Cannot open bayes
databases /var/empty/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: File exists
Anyone else see this? Thanks!
lock failures reported by spamd on occasion are somewhat normal.. It
happens when spamd tri
Hey all!
Saw the following in my logs this morning:
Dec 16 06:39:54 gateway spamd[9846]: Cannot open bayes
databases /var/empty/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: File exists
Anyone else see this? Thanks!
James
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with
Hi All..
Are there any plans to store all bayes/awl related tokens etc inside
a mysql database? Currently i have a server farm with 10 SA dedicated
servers which are handling just over 350 000 mailboxes.. Wouldnt it
be better to have everything updating one central place? (having
it inside a mysql
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes database stats
>
>
> Today I have dumped my bayes db and calculate some statistics.
>
> 742753 - total number of words in it
> 515654 - total number of words which have been seen only once
> 80485 - ... twice
> 35325 - ... 3 t
Today I have dumped my bayes db and calculate some statistics.
742753 - total number of words in it
515654 - total number of words which have been seen only once
80485 - ... twice
35325 - ... 3 times
This statistics shows that most of the db us not used, just eating my hard drive (44
MB to
well ham is very site dependant (point taken especially with security
reasons), so i dont think sending ham will really be something that can
be accomplished very easily so i think sticking to spam only would be
best. By only sending spam, i would hope to achieve a large spam corpus
that someone c
Adam Denenberg wrote:
> SA List,
>
> What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
> able to allow people to submit confirmed ham and/or spam to a large
> bayes corpus repository (or maybe just spam) where people could then
> download (or somehow do an sa-learn remotely) to
On December 11, 2003 09:10 am, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> SA List,
>
> I am writing for feedback about a new project i would like to start
> and would love feedback/help from the excellent community that has been
> built here on the SA lists.
>
> What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I w
At 09:10 AM 12/11/03 -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
SA List,
What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
able to allow people to submit confirmed ham and/or spam to a large
bayes corpus repository (or maybe just spam) where people could then
download (or somehow do an sa-le
03 8:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes Corpus Project
>
>
> What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would
> like to be able to allow people to submit confirmed ham
> and/or spam to a large bayes corpus repository (or maybe just
> spam) where
SA List,
I am writing for feedback about a new project i would like to start
and would love feedback/help from the excellent community that has been
built here on the SA lists.
What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
able to allow people to submit confirmed ham and
At 02:46 PM 12/7/03 -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_80 0 0 5.300 2.862
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 3.002
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 3.008
if I'm reading this correctly more points are given for classifying a message
as 80% probable than for 90% probab
I am having a bit of a time trying to get bayes working with
qmail/qmailscanner. My server is acting like a relay server for my
domain and does not have mailboxes. Does anyone have any information
that they can share with point me in the right direction?
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 02:46:39PM -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> Can some of you experts explain this one to me?
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq01.005.htp
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance of official policy, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking at the standard scoring of the BAYES rules and I see
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_80 0 0 5.300 2.862
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 3.002
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 3.008
if I'm reading this correctly more points are given f
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Lukreme wrote:
> spamd[33762]: Cannot open bayes databases
> /home/user/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
> spamd[33762]: processing message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for kremels:5003.
> spamd[33762]: clean message (0.8/5.0) for user:5003 in 0.2 seconds,
> 55
spamd[33089]: Creating default_prefs [/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs]
spamd[33089]: Cannot write to /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
Permission denied
spamd[33089]: Couldn't create readable default_prefs for
[/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs]
spamd[33089]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:07:25PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> I think the implementation of "each" in DB_File must be inefficient,
> creating an in-memory list. It might be a good idea to check out
> DB_File's built-in iterator methods, now that we only support that
> db module. Haven't check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
>The expiry should, theoretically, not take a lot of memory since it
>really only needs to have 1 token in memory at a time while it copies
>between database files. An expiry forces a journal sync though, so an
>expiry run wil
1 - 100 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
