On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Billy Huddleston wrote: > Are you all load balancing these? If so, are you doing it at the SMTP level > or using SPAMD ? I'm getting ready to implement a 2 node system with > qmail..and wondering if using a single SMTP machine calling spamc against a > cluster of SA machines running SPAMD is better/worse the running 2 machines > with qmail and spamd all running on the same machine.. >
I would run spamd/spamc on each machine. Use the spamd socket, its a bit faster and then you can it won't get buggered by iptables rules, and the rules can be stricter in the end. The only gotcha is still the global bayes db. Again, I don't think will be a problem if autolearn is off, and you just teach the bayes db manually, or by some daily cron on a spam box (don't forget to feed it some ham as well) Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
