On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:21:06PM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote: > http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#learning%20op > tions > > bayes_ignore_header header_name
::bangs head on wall:: How did I miss *that*? Thanks for correcting my careless reading. In a broader sense though, shouldn't fields like To: be excluded by default? It seems like if I receive more than 50% spam, this is a receipe for disaster. Of course, some spam won't have a valid To: field, but it seems like constant things like this will be very bad arbitors. -- Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Pope has a Water Cannon. It is a Water Cannon. He fires Holy-Water from it. It is a Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses it. It is a Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses the Hell out of it. It is a Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He has it pierced. It is a Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He makes it official. It is a Canon Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. Batman and Robin arrive. He shoots them. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
