- Forwarded message from Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.206])
> by mail.ssc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E9A12E
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:31:42PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Dan Wilder wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:49:36 -0800:
>
> > This is a highly automated RBL based on some big spamtraps,
> >
>
> I'm finding spamtrap RBLs quite problematic because they list the wrong
&
D> That's the way the scores were optimized. There's no real reason other
D> than they were determined to be optimal at 0.
D> Duncan Findlay
Restoring them for non-bayes me!:
awk '$4=="0"&&!/BAYES/{print $1,$2,$3}' \
/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf >> $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs
[I'm no
hanged
to one or more spaces. You might try unpacking again.
--
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclips
ostly on mail that's
also in at least one of SpamCop, DNSBL, SORBS, or Dynablock.
It hasn't fired for me so far on anything that came in otherwise
below my second sorting threshold of 13, but for those above
that, it's maybe one more nail in the c
Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail
8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter
0.2.0+cvs. This server acts as a filtering relay in front of a Lotus
Domino mail server. There are no user preferences.
Yesterday, at approximately 5:20pm, m
I would suggest you use SpamStats from http://www.gryzor.com/tools/
I ran both, and SpamStats reported more of both Spam and Ham. I suspect
sa-stats is missing some records.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:43
We are using the script by Nikos Kantarakias called "yet another virus
recipe" for Procmail. See http://agriroot.aua.gr/~nikant/nkvir/
Nikos added Novarg this morning.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:08 AM
| To: Ric
iday, January 23, 2004 12:44 PM
| To: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rules Du Jour v 1.07b
|
| Dan,
|
| On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 09:04, Smart,Dan wrote:
|
| > This command works every time from command line, but not
| passed as a
| > param from SA_RESTART.
| > "
ill be appreciated.
Dan O'B
/* Sending this a 2nd time... originally sent @ 10:37am EST on Sat
01/15/04 */
Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail
8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter
0.2.0+cvs. This server acts as a filter
ill be appreciated.
Dan O'B
/* Sending this a 2nd time... originally sent @ 10:37am EST on Sat
01/15/04 */
Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail
8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter
0.2.0+cvs. This server acts as a filter
each time putting the commands in one at a
time in the restart if block, which does work, but passing it as the
SA_RESTART parameter would be really nice.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 5:18 PM
| To: S
Thanks. Will try in the AM.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 5:18 PM
| To: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rules Du Jour v 1.07b
|
| On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 22:57, Smart,Dan wrote:
|
need to make sure postfix starts if the SA_RESTART fails.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:04 AM
| To: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rules Du Jour v 1.07b
|
| On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:
Chris:
Great job on the scripts. I have modified the munging on Tripwire (set name
to TW) and BigEvil (comment out WXYZ). How do I add these custom munges to
my_rules_du_jour?
tia
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, January 22,
Try MailScanner. That's what we use. It works well for just relaying
mail onto an exchange server.
Spamassassin ties into it, and it's pretty easy to configure.
http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/
-Original Message-
From: Dustin O Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesd
ules won't have any wildcards, just basically a big blacklist of
URLs found in SPAM.
Thanks!
Dan
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse act
> >
> > and from the email headers
> >
> > Received: from s2.habeas.com (s2.habeas.com [64.142.16.37])
> >
> > This is kinda funny... hehehe
Somebody's gaming spamcop. It's pretty easy.
--
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Most likely scenario is to follow the money trail. Thankfully, the laws to enforce
copyright infringement are quite tough, and include things like injunctions and
seizures.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Cline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue Jan 13 17:34:19 2004
To: Dan
I hate how formatting gets screwed up sometimes...
##--
## Grab a copy of Habeas SWE with Spam-Status Yes
:0 c:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*HABEAS_SWE
${SPOOLDIR}/habeas
##--##
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Smart,Dan
| Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:40 PM
| To:
Great idea.
Here's my recipe...
##-
## Grab a copy of Habeas SWE with Spam-Status Yes
:0 c:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*HABEAS_SWE
${SPOOLDIR}/habeas
##--
Where spooldir is where I store my spam mbox files
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Charles Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
[* Here's our official response. My personal comments are below. - dan
*]
Habeas, the leading provider of emailer reputation services, has
recently come under attack from an as yet unidentified spammer. The
spammer is illegally utilizing the Habeas Warrant Mark in emails which
are prom
I run a P733 with 384MB RAM with Red Hat 7.3. Use
Postfix/Procmail/html-trap (Hardin's Sanitizer)/SpamAssassin combination.
Use DCC, DNSBLs, BigEvil/NovRules/OctRules, Jennifer's
Popcorn/Backhair/Weeds/Cpox, and Bayes with SA. The box is relay only. No
local mail.
I also keep a copy of all head
I'm waiting for Greylisting too. Vernon's DCC stuff is being debugged for
Greylisting which should soon be a reliable engine for this. I use Postfix
as my MTA, so I'm waiting for an integration that happens at MTA handshake.
So far, I haven't seen anything. Some said that there is a Postfix upgr
Matt Kettler wrote:
99% of the time you're much better off implementing a whitelist in
whatever layer you are using to call SA in the first place (ie: procmail
them around sa instead of through it)..
In my setup the SA is called from postfix (-o content_filter in master.cf).
The box does not ha
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
What about the trusted_networks parameter?
From perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
DNS
blacklist checks will never query for hosts on these
networks.
Exactly as stated, these (dnsbl) are the only tests that are not performed for
trusted networks.
danb
Is anyone else doing anything like this? Or maybe I am going
about this the wrong way?
Thanks in advance!
Dan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced br
---Original Message-
| From: Carl Chipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:32 AM
| To: Smart,Dan
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] detecting large collections of random words
|
| Btw, why not rename your rules CP_RANDOMWORDS_10 and _15 so
| that the name is more accurate descrip
So I take it that the final rewrite of this rule would be:
cpeterson.cf -
## I've noticed that a lot of spams recently have been following the
random-words technique,
## with very little "spam" content - often just an image or some obfuscated
text. Has anyone
## given any thought to
Hello,
I have setup a local RBL list on the server running spamassassin. How do I
go about setting spamassassin to check the local copy of this rbl?
Thank in advance,
Dan
--
Dan Spray, Director of Internet Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting Point Norfolk, NE < &l
ng".
You _don't_ want to allow relaying based on sender domain name. It's too
easy to forge "from" address.
--
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Bec
Mike,
If you're installing on a Windows box (to integrate with GroupWise/Guinevere or
whatever), use Perl 5.6.1 instead of 5.8.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.
Maybe spamassassin needs some parts that can be downloaded more often
than the whole software, like Windows virus checkers' pattern files,
but for the 'latest major spam patterns'.
Of course this might already be what you are doing, I haven't kept track.
-
RIBE line, SCORE line, etc.
> Basically, the stuff that makes a rule a rule and not just a
> regular expression.
>
> If you can think of some useful behaviour I'd might be
> interested in coding it.
>
>
Check out this tool:
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/cmos.jsp
Dan
---
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0800, Kirk Moore wrote:
> Sorry, What I am looking for is a tool to take an existing regex rule and
> expand it out and show all the expresions that it looks for.,
man regex
--
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL
I did get this fixed. Change owner and group to the user running spamd.
Works great then.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raquel
Rice
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Permission Denied (was Re
Samuel,
Michael Bell (the author of the HOWTO) recommends using ActivePerl 5.6.1 as that's
what he's tested with, using builds 631, 632, 633, and 635. ActiveState hsa build 635
available for download. From the HOWTO:
"ActiveState now has Perl 5.8 available. SpamAssassin currently has a few issu
hy waste resources.
Thanks again to everyone who helped.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Spray
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:20 PM
To: Spamassassin-Talk-Admin
Subject: [SAtalk] Desperate Plea
Okay, after 2 days of trying to f
Alan:
Do you find any value running Pyzor? I gave up on it long ago, as it never
seemed to hit on any quantity of Spam.
BTW: I normally test things by doing a spamassassin -D --lint
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Alan Munday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Tuesday, December 16,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:08:44AM -0500, AltGrendel wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 20:45, Dan Wilder wrote:
>
> >
> > The reasons I would never in a million years set up such an
> > autoresponder are:
> >
> > * It only increases the burden on the Internet a
ng to get lock on
/var/spool/filter/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist with 4 retries
Thank you to all who sent replied, please let me know what else you may need from me
and I will be glad to make it available.
Dan
-- Original Message ------
From: "Dan Spr
him or his software to my personal
straight-to-/dev/null list.
--
-----
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Technical Manager
SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549 Phone: 206-782-8808
Seattle, WA
RH7.3. Any help that someone could give would be great.
Thanks in advance,
Dan
--
Dan Spray, Director of Internet Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting Point Norfolk, NE < <http://www.conpoint.com/>
http://www.conpoint.com/>
Voice - 402.371.4530 x208 Fax - 402.37
I suggest that instructions to get dccifd running should be included in
INSTALL...
Compile the dcc as directed in INSTALL doc.
Get dccproc running first as described in INSTALL doc.
To use dccifd in Spamassassin fix the dcc_conf and add path settings.
In /var/dcc/dcc_conf:
DCCM_ENABLE=off
DCCM_L
filtering. I am
not sure what is taking so long. I tried starting spamd with the -L command
and it didn't seem to make a difference. I shut off bayes and rbl checking
as well. I following the instructions on:
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Any help here would be great.
achine who also uses spamassassin, piped the same
message mbox file to sa-learn there, it said learned from 3 messages (3
messages scanned).
Why won't my spamassassin learn?
--- Dan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Hello,
I am going to try setting up SpamAssassin with RedHat 7.3 and Postfix. I
was wandering if anyone has any good how-to's or personal notes on doing
this that would be great. I want to use the MySQL function as well. Any
help would be great.
Thanks in advance,
Dan
--
Dan
in
folder. When I run sa-learn (as root) my bayes
files are created in /var/root/.spamassassin/ but as user root?
I am very confused and I know I am not doing this correctly. Could someone please
point me in the right direction on this?
Th
Hi Matt,
I created in a custom .cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Kettler
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
rfull PayPal Virus
scorePAYPAL_VIRUS_001 100
I know I need a virus scanner on my mail server, which I am working on, but I need a
quick fix for the time being. Pretty simple
hich score an message with "YOUR PAYPAL.COM ACCOUNT EXPIRES" in the subject. I am not
worried about false
Thanks for the insight.
When I run mass-check-results-to-mbox I get:
---
# sort -rn +1 ham.log | head -20 | ./mass-check-results-to-mbox
open /usr/local/src/confham.1173754 failed: at ./mass-check-results-to-mbox
line 125, <> line 1.
X-Mass-Check-Warning: open /usr/local/
gt; (Possible Bug?)
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:42:55 -0700, Dan Tappin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> > My hunch, which could be totally wrong, is that when parsing these
> > messages the multiple headers in the Outlook attached messages is
>
I'm trying to do the mass-check corpus cleanup using the method in
CORPUS_SUBMIT file. My hard-sorted spams and hams are stored in MBOXs.
I'm assuming that the scripts: mass-check-results-to-mbox, mboxget, and
extract-message-from-mbox are used to help in this process to check and
purge improperl
nch, which could be totally wrong, is that when parsing these messages the
multiple headers in the Outlook attached messages is
causing the problem.
Dan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or ju
Original Message-
| From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:38 AM
| To: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Running mass-check with local rules
|
| At 10:57 AM 12/11/2003, Smart,Dan wrote:
| >How do you get mass-check to use your local &
How do you get mass-check to use your local "custom" rules in local.cf and
other .cf files?
TIA
<>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Lin
>> And what if it doesn't match any of our ok_languages? then it will
>> fail, against our wishes. Can you guarantee that you know all the
>> possibilities?
D> I still don't understand. You don't speak 1000 languages. Most speak 3
D> or 4 at most They can add these to ok_languanges.
OK, you
e good to go.
|
| Oh, and appears to run faster in our environment than
| dccproc, since it does not need to be instantiated for each
| message scanned.
|
| Bill
| - Original Message -
| From: "Smart,Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Wedne
The DCC documentation says that the dccifd interface is much more efficient
than dccproc. I see from doing a spamassassin -D that it looks for it.
Is there any install procedure for dccifd, and should this be the generally
recommended interface for dcc?
Why or why not?
TIA
<>
--
D> I'm confused. There is no need for not_ok_languages, as you can simply
D> list all languages but the one you want in ok_languages. Furthermore,
D> few people wish to receive mail in every language.
Just like white list / black list, you have both because it would be a
pain to try to keep track
How would you run a spamassassin --lint to check if the file is ok before
sending the mail and restarting?
Ideas?
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Smart,Dan
| Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 3:21 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync?
|
| Than
Thanks for the script Gary/Peter. I've cleaned things up and here is what I
put together:
#!/bin/sh
## This file updates the big evil policy file for spam assassin
DATE=`date +"%Y%m%d-%H%M"`
[ -f /tmp/bigevil.cf ] && rm -f /tmp/bigevil.cf
wget -N http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla
available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200
It seems very inconsistant where SA is looking for the database. The use_bayes = 1
option # 2 shows 26 ham(s) in Bayes which seems
about right given the amount of e-mail I have fed sa-learn.
I am guessing this has something to do with
}"
:0 ci
| /usr/bin/sa-learn --forget
}
<>
| -Original Message-----
| From: Smart,Dan
| Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:46 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SA-Talk poisoning Bayes
|
| Since this is not a delivering recipe (not to a file or pip
ering in the procmail log
LOG="${NL}Forgetting Bayes Poison${NL}"
:0 ci
| /usr/bin/sa-learn --forget
}
<>
| -----Original Message-
| From: Smart,Dan
| Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:47 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SA-Talk poisoning B
) However. I am seeing allot of the spam that is getting
through coming from dsl people. What is the best way to block this? Any
ideas? Any other products I should put on? razor?
Thanks!
Dan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
This evaluates to an Or statement
:0 Ec
| /usr/bin/sa-learn --forget
---
Not sure if I need to clone,
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:22 AM
| To: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sub
m not running SA as
this user (I am running it as the mta user that my mail server uses).
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> David B Funk
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:59 PM
> To: Pete Henshall
> Cc: [E
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Henshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish
>
>
> Hi dan, list,
>
> > I think
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and about 50 more like this.
>
>
> a bit of a mish mash of stuff since 2.4 i guess but all works if I set bayes
> 0 :\
>
> Dan, maybe it is looking in that dir cause the mta user has a home dir set
> to /Users/admin/ - my syste
Initialising learner
debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200
debug: bayes: 12764 untie-ing
debug: bayes: 12764 untie-ing db_toks
Now I do not understand why SA is looking in /Users/admin for the user state
directory? Can I tell SA to not use the user state
d
In reading the sa-learn man file, it says running discussions of spam
through sa-learn is bad. Does SA take this into account already, or should
I create a procmail rule to bypass SA for messages from SATalk and
(possibly) Postfix-List ?
<>
Not to get nitpicky, but could you add a one line comment of what was
patched in the release, and retain old ones for history?
I just downloaded 1.57a and it would be helpful to know what was fixed.
Nothing detailed...like:
... Example
# Dec 4, 03 9:35 AM EST
## 1.57a - Typo fixed in BigE
So if I set the Journal to a really big number, like 10MB, then the
once-per-day opportunistic sync rule should kick in and sync once per day.
So a sync takes as much or more memory than an expiration run?
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent
?
Is the goal to get the journal syncing about the same frequency as an expiry
run is made?
TIA
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Ted Cabeen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 6:22 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subje
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:21:19PM +0100, J?rgen R. Plasser wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> --On 03.12.2003 08:07 -0800 Dan Wilder wrote:
>
> >I'd hazard a guess there's something missing in your install
> >of RH's program development stuff.
> >
> >What do
hing missing in your install
of RH's program development stuff.
What does 'config.log' say? The additional details should be
near the end.
--
-
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Technical Manager
SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549 Phone: 206-782-8808
Seattle, WA 98155-0549IC
?
Thanks
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes
> At 01:31 PM 12/1/2003, Dan wrote:
> >Does anyone k
Does anyone know where I can find more info on bayes? I have it turned on in
my local.cf. But Im sure there is more to setting it up! ha ha ha ha
Thanks
Dan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net
is is the
course Mr. Harbaugh followed.
I happen to favor the freeze-the-vendor-versions approach, simplifying
it by marking Perl and _all_ modules as installed but on version hold,
then using CPAN exclusively for all Perl related upg
guys set your hits
to?
Also I seem to get "some" spam through even if it has a high hit count. Any
ideas on how this could happen? I have attached the header info.
Thanks!
Dan
Received: from [18.208.230.29] by 12-212-237-30.client.attbi.com with ESMTP
id 372C4ACEA57; Sat, 29 Nov 200
the server is down" phone calls / comments. :^)
I seem to have it resolved. I have reduced the maximum number of concurent SMTP
accept processes on my mail server and now things
seem to be ok. We also have seemed to have been flooded with spam and viruses today
which might have agrivated
hard
reboot is required.
This system has 700+ MB or RAM.
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert A. Hayden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:35 AM
> To: Dan Tappin
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Run Away SA...
>
?? I have run spamassassin --lint -D and
also tried disabling RBL look-ups on a hunch.
Do I basically need to disable config files one by one and watch for the problem to go
away?
Thanks,
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Beh
Easynet.nl goes offline on Dec 1
Be sure to set
score RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK 0
(unless you rsync this list locally)
Another DNSBL death
<>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you b
to
join the fray that ensued. A lesser soul would just run
away and hide.
--
---------
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Technical Manager
SSC, Inc. And Sometimes Staff Writer
Publishers of
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:43:35PM +0200, Zak McGregor wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The InfoWorld article has just hit Slashdot (http://www.slashdot.org/)
It took 'em long enough.
--
-----
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s hanging up on a particular message--I'm not sure where to find
that information. It's usually hanging on messages being delivered to me, but
that may be just because I get an insane amount of email.
--
Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSCC Unix System Administrator
.
When I run sa-learn I only see the '1 message learned' output even thought I forwarded
multiple messages to that mailbox.
Any ideas / comments?
Dan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.ne
//www.infoworld.com/article/03/07/18/28FEspamassassin_1.h
> tml
>
> Another tidbit from his article:
> "SpamAssassin is easy to install and customize, with a basic interface for
> adding domains and e-mail addresses to blacklists and white lists".
>
>
> On Mon, 24
rning friendly UI and so on. But the examination of relative
effectiveness was clearly biased, and it would seem only appropriate to
say so in print.
--
---------
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Technical Manager
SSC, Inc. P.O. Bo
RE_Y2K,DCC_CHECK,FORG
ED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTM
L_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,X_MSMAIL_PR
IORITY_HIGH,X_PRIORITY_HIGH
And I don't see anything about RBL scans.
Thanks in advance,
Dan
--
Dan Spra
7;always_add_headers' and 'always_add_report' set to 1 and my
'spamassassin --lint -D' output looks normal with no errors.
Does SA require a perl module to re-write the headers or am I missing something simple
here?
Thanks,
Dan
---
I'm working on just that.
My thought, and I must admit I don't know all the theory involved, is that
the effectiveness of Bayes and the FN/FP is purely a function of how you
trained it. The *ONLY* way (in my mind) to score the Bayes functions would
be to train it and run the Mass-check. I'm work
0 3.0
score BAYES_98 4.0
score BAYES_99 5.4
-
Comments?
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Ted Cabeen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 6:22 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subj
If you install the textcat with user root, but run spamd as another user,
make sure that everyone can read the installed libraries. I had this
problem. Not sure what caused it. Some libraries had global read, some
didn't.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Frederick M Avolio [mailto:[
7;always_add_headers' and 'always_add_report' set to 1 and my
'spamassassin --lint -D' output looks normal with no errors.
Does SA require a perl module to re-write the headers or am I missing something simple
here?
Thanks,
Dan
---
rules, he wasn't able to avoid all spammy words that Bayes had
trained on and still get across his semantic content.
- dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.dankohn.com/>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
2.60 works great. It works much better when you use Bayes and network
checks. Note that both of the latter have been significantly improved
over 2.55.
- dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.dankohn.com/>
-Original Message-
From: Jess Anderson [m
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:31:42PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:30:51 -0800
> Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> anyone posts to the list>
>
> > Some mailing list software has the so-called VERP capability, in
> > which "From
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
