[SAtalk] Problem with regex

the stock SA ruleset already does. I'm familiar with perl regexps, and this regexp works in a perl program without catching the word 'testing'. SA seems to be ignoring the NOT (^) portion of [^e] (for example), instead matching 'e' instead of not matchine

RE: [SAtalk] Razor server timeout problems ?

5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm "thrill.cloudmark.com" responds normally, except it returns "mail # is not spam" for all mail. A quick grepmail of my user mailboxes finds that RAZOR2_* rule hits stopped sometime yesterday, no hits today. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. -

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on Qmail Relay

The email might be to large and aren't getting scanned. What are your spamc options? You can use the '-s' to bump up the max message size when calling it. There is someplace else it's set to but I can't remember where. spamc -s 35 -Original Message- From: Atif Faruqui [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

Okay, I think I found out what went wrong. I think emacs is doing something to the file when I paste the rule set into it. Sorry and thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Crowe Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:47 AM To

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

Thanks, that is better, but I am still showing a parse error on j_backhair_37. Thanks for your patience. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:37 AM To: 'Jason Crowe'; [EMAIL

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

1.0 Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: desfull J_BACKHs Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: defulls Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, Jan

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

rmation from me I'd be happy to provide what is needed. Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been com

RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.

Read the first email! He's using qmail-scanner.pl The default config for that sets fast_spamassassin, ie. spamc -c -f. this will not return the full spamassassin report to qmail-scanner you need to turn off the -c option. I know this is in the list archives I have answered it before. -Ori

[SAtalk] mrtg

spam versus clean messages based on syslog'd information if they were interested. Thanks, Jason mc3:~ # cat /etc/mrtg/load.cfg WorkDir: /usr/local/apache/htdocs/mrtg WithPeak[_]: ymw Options[_]: growright, gauge, nopercent, nolegend, nobanner, noo #AbsMax[_]: 40 XSize[_]: 500 YSize[_]: 160 T

Re: [SAtalk] SA Performance .......

fs. > > I'd be willing to compile a summary should you wish to e-mail me direct ... That'd be great! -- /* Jason Philbrook | Midcoast Internet Solutions - Internet Access, KB1IOJ| Hosting, and TCP-IP Networks for Midcoast Maine http://f64.nu/ |

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

k similar future email. If you have any questions, see [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details. It appears spamassassin is running ok from this output. I haven't found the qmail-scanner list to be that helpful in the past but I guess I don't have a choice. Thanks for your help. Jason -

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:27:46 -0500 From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jason Lieurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EM

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

don't see the problem with my local.cf file. Jason --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the

[SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

blacklist_from @item.ntnu.no -- Jason --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys ad

Re: [SAtalk] SA not following local.cf in SA 2.61

Matt Kettler said: > That should be self explanatory.. your ok_locales statement is invalid... you've > got an ok_locales statement, but nothing after it... > That's not what I meant but anyway, I did as you suggested and ran it again with no errors. Thanks, fo

Re: [SAtalk] SA not following local.cf in SA 2.61

Matt Kettler said: > At 09:30 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote: >>Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or >> following the whole local.cf as it should. > > I'd start off by running spamassassin --lint and fix the errors. >

[SAtalk] SA not following local.cf in SA 2.61

. ok_locales score QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT -1.5 num_check_received 3 blacklist_from @item.ntnu.no It reads the 7.5 required hits and says spam yes/no but DOES NOT rewrite the subject. What am I missing? Thanks in advance. -- Jason

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn on hand-sorted mailboxes

Set the -D and make sure it's reading the mbox right. I had a problem with that. If it's running ok the spamassassin has already learned these mails. It's smart enough not to learn the same or similar message more than once. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [SAtalk] Using outlook mail to feed sa-learn

Title: Message There is a util to convert pst 2 mbox. I think it works with outlook express 4-5 not 6 and oulook 97-xp. If I had the url I would post it but I seem to have mis-placed my brian. -Original Message-From: Gabrie van Zanten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesda

RE: [SAtalk] SA on windows??

Pop3proxy with spamassassin works GREAT I've been using it for months and no problems. Install was fairly strait forward. -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:33 AM To: Nick Tong; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA o

[SAtalk] how does FORGED_RCVD_HELO work?

in do with it as it pleases. Here is an example where I tested it manually. Note that I put "random" in for the helo information. Postfix would reject this if the above mentioned option were on. How does the FORGED_RCVD_HELO work or is there another test that might help here?

[SAtalk] Is punctuation really needed? (fwd)

that. I've had one spammer who just puts a random period in the message and it doesn't get tagged. Taking out all the periods in the message and it scored a 10.6 just from the body of the message. Just a thought. Jason Portwood [

RE: [SAtalk] stats script, by (fairly) popular demand

'mikea' scribbled on Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:26 PM: > There are probably some adjustments to be made. > > Use at your own risk. Enjoy. > > If you improve on it, please make the improvements available > to the list. > > Mike Andrews > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tired old

RE: [SAtalk] stats script

Come one Come ALL!!! Get the script here. http://members.lycos.co.uk/njadmin/mailstats.php3 Larry Gilson scribbled on Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:52 PM: > Everyone has an opinion so since you ask, I'll give you mine. Your > script > includes stats on SA so therefore

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin not rewriting the e-mail subject.

qmail-scanner.pl find the spamassassin binary line and remove the '-c' -Original Message- From: Daniel Poulin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin not rewriting the e-mail subject. Hi everyone, I ha

[SAtalk] Checking whitelist

How would one go about viewing the entries in your auto-whitlist and manually changing it? Thnx J --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make

RE: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers

YES you can subject_tag '[SA Says: _HITS_] SPAM' -Original Message- From: Diego Puppin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers Dear all, is it possible to add the spamassassin

RE: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 occasionally does no markup on spam

d without any errors from spamd. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/ * (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area * (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free > -Original Message- > From: Rich Puhek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, O

Re: [SAtalk] PINE shortcut to spamassassin -d ?

te a spam.sh, and a ham.sh, have them both do something like above but instead of > foo, pipe the output to sa-learn. Jason -- Jason Englander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 394F 7E02 C105 7268 777A 3F5A 0AC0 C618 0675 80CA --- This SF.net

Re: [SAtalk] correlation between message ID and spam

confusing the fact that a lot of MTAs insert their own Message-IDs if one isn't already present. Most Spammers don't use Message-IDs, and so you end up with your own MTA shoving one in (with it's own hostname/etc) as it goes through it. Qmail is the exception: it doesn't a

[SAtalk] Question about my setup: Feedback please

SA to enhance my spam blocking abilities; For instance, the bayes learning system. With that in mind, and the way my setup is, anybody have any suggestions or recommendations on how to take advantage of more features of SA? Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks.

RE: [SAtalk] Outbook 2003

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 tagged_above=0.0 required=6.3 It hasn't been marked as spam it just had those tests run on it that's all. -Original Message- From: Thiago Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Outbook 2

[SAtalk] More spam tricks

Here's a good one for ya. Looks like the [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoted from books. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from otakumail.com ([200.43.110.86]) by mta007.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;

[SAtalk] troubleshooting a 2.6 install (upgrade)

something, but I'm not sure what. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot further? TIA. -- Jason Dufair - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dufair.org/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek hea

[SAtalk] Need help with SpamPD

I setup a user and group called 'mail' so I could make things a bit easier for SpamPD. cat /etc/passwd mail:*:1001:1001:mail:/home/mail:/sbin/nologin cat /etc/group mail:*:1001: So im not sure what is going on there. Anyone have any suggestions on what the problem could be and h

[SAtalk] Spampd vs Spamd

situations? Thanks everyone. Cheers, Jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

RE: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

ou posted a few days ago: @{$Mail::SpamAssassin::TIMELOG->{"keeplogs"}} = (); This should probably be added to bugzilla. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/ * (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area * (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free &

RE: [SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

rint $socket "QUIT\n"; close($socket); exit(0); Now, this could be completely off and not necessary. My main goal is to have incoming mail passed to SA for reviewing and tagged as it should be. Maybe I dont need a second script? I dunno. Im just guessing at this point. I appreciate every

[SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

suggestions or can help me out to correct my problem? I do appreciate it. Cheers, Jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassi

[SAtalk] Problems getting spamd working with postfix

cant figure out for the life of me on how to fix that error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Im getting more and more confused here. :/ Jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.

[SAtalk] Question on installing SA and using spamd

ere I want them, and then run spamd in the background (using the -d flag?). Finally, configure postfix to call for spamc instead of spamassassin, correct? Just want to make sure I have all my bases covered. Thanks for all the help. Jason ---

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

That seems to be it. For whatever reason, /etc/mail/spamassassin was empty. It is corrected now & messages are receiving scores. HOORAY! :-) On 9/7/03 8:55 PM, "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would guess that's not finding the config files -- if there's no > rules, it'll run throug

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

No. I use CGPSA to get the messages to CommuniGate Pro. I think it's interesting that it "Identified non-spam (0.0/5.0) for in 0.0 seconds" Seems too quick. Anyway, here's the message. 12:12:30.24 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) out(25): 54 FILE Queue/360223.msg\n 12:12:30.28 2 PWD-00035([127.0.0.1]) '[EMAI

[SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

This message made is past SpamAssassin without setting off ANYTHING? (Score of 0.0.) Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: by bluehome.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.3) with PIPE id 360205; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:05:04 -0700 Received: from [68.198.199.174] (HELO atlantech.fr) by bluehome.net

[SAtalk] Need to change 'required hits' but no local.cf file

n/user_prefs is out of the question. I have some spamassassin directories here: /usr/local/share/spamassassin /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin but not here: /etc/spamassassin /usr/share/spamassassin Any help would be greatly apprecia

RE: [SAtalk] spamassassin and windows

Just got done setting up pop3proxy with spamassassin and it works great. I use it for checking my home email. Setup was relatively easy. You need: Pop3proxy activePerl And spamassassin tar ball -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, Septembe

[SAtalk] LOW score 0.6 why????

Just had this one come through for domains. Really low score. Should I add a new rule?? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hotbox.ru ([211.219.2.60]) by mta014.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [SAtalk] spamd & user_prefs

27;m starting spamd with: usr/bin/spamd -a -d -m 10 -r /var/run/spamd.pid & and in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have: allow_user_rules 1 Does all of this seem to make sense? My ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs only has one command which is 'required_hits 3.5'. Thanks for the he

[SAtalk] spamd & user_prefs

spamd which is running as the user 'filter'. Is there some sort of special permissions that spamc/spamd need to read the user_prefs file in ~/.spamassassin? I tried running spamd as root and it didn't seem to matter. Thanks, Jason ---

Re: [SAtalk] OT SA policy for ISP usage

Same here. This, I feel offers the best protection because it makes it the end user's responsibility for what they do with the messages. On 8/19/03 7:21 PM, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We send all email through spamassassin but do no actual filtering. ALL > email i

[SAtalk] FW: Low Cost Traffic

This scored very low 3.8 any idea why? --- Begin Message --- Hi Dear friend, I send you this email Because I find you sign some traffic exchange program . Maybe you will be interested in some low cost popup traffic .Yep , it's low cost and real traffic. ADVERTISERS !! 1000 Unique PopUp only 1

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and blacklisting

ched any light on this? Many Thanks Jason Crummack Easysoft Limited --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an

[SAtalk] Blacklist Question

dd-to-blacklist the check_whitelist command then returns 100.0 (100.0/1) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none Shouldn't the spamassassin --add-to-blacklist also add the ip address in the message headers? Jason Easysoft Limited --- This SF.Net

[SAtalk] How to turn off scanning outbound mail for spam...

Im running postfix with amavisd-new and spamassassin. I was curious as to how I disable spamassassin from scanning email that is sent out from my intranet. Where can I specify this? Or is this something i need to configure in amavisd-new? Thank you. Jas -

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and blacklisting

mation has been lost also when the next message comes in from the above two address its marked back down to 6.0 again, in effect negating the blacklisting. Thanks Jason Crummack Easysoft Limited > Good afternoon, Jason, > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Jason Crummack wrote: > > > Cou

[SAtalk] Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis-new and Spamassassin question

vscan4096 Jul 29 16:55 /var/amavis/.spamassassin/ Everything should be correct. I followed the directions as specified. As for my version: SpamAssassin version 2.55 Jason At 07:44 AM 7/30/2003 +0200, you wrote: Jason Williams wrote: Can someone explain to me why this is and what is the

[SAtalk] Confused about something with SpamAssassin and Amavis-new

mmend method? Thank you. Jason --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.

[SAtalk] Problem installing spamassassin via perl -MCPAN

returned bad status, install seems impossible Anyone have any idea on what the prob could be? Jason --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

, it is caps sensitive. Jason At 11:09 PM 7/28/2003 +0200, you wrote: In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:53:50 -0400 "Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > There's also some kind of dependency error in the redhat RPM/ > SpamAssassin chain. I never did get the most

[SAtalk] Bayesian filtering and forwards

How are others handing this problem? Is there some good way of getting the *entire* message back from a POP user? Does it matter? How much of the Bayesian engine's effectiveness is based on being able to see full headers as they will actually appear in filtered messages? Thanks for any hel

Re: [SAtalk] qmail, virtual users, and spamassassin

I am doing this through a patch to qmail-scanner-queue. It grabs the 'delivered-to' header and uses that with the "-u" switch to spamc. Does the -u flag require a "real" username, or can it be set arbitrarily to an email address? Care to share your qmail-scanne

[SAtalk] qmail, virtual users, and spamassassin

Is there a way to allow the email address to be consulted for %u and %d, instead of looking at the local user running spamc? Thank you for any tips. - Jason Parsons --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites includi

[SAtalk] Problem installing Spamassassin via perl -MCPAN...

oblem is. I've tried searching for pod2man, but i've been unable to locate anything that can help me fix this problem. Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. Jason --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run m

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60cvs (todays) "undefined value as an ARRAY reference"

time - just the odd one (well, if one per 20 emails is 'odd') causes this error. *However* - it causes SA to crash - i.e. the message isn't tagged correctly. Doesn't this imply some error checking is needed in that area? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trim

[SAtalk] SA 2.60cvs (todays) "undefined value as an ARRAY reference"

king? This is under RH8. Any ideas? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 --- This SF.net email

[SAtalk] Blocking during MTA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Howdy, Has anyone integrated SpamAssassin into Postfix such that any high scoring spam can be rejected during MTA rather than this process of simply categorizing? I use lots of RBL's and header_check/body_check to reject during the delivery process..

[SAtalk] Global white/black lists?

find documentation to show me how to do it, although it seems pretty simple. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for the help... SA is really doing a great job for us. Blocking around 2,500 spam /week. Jason --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Movie FILTER THIS VIRUS ALREADY!!!

you know. And depending on the vendor, SourceForge could find themselves requiring a 100,000+ user license... whoops, make that 100,010,... 100,020... Of course - I never saw any of these so-called viruses - our AV system catches such beasties. [if I never saw them, then do they even exist?...] -- Chee

Re: [SAtalk] Missed this spam

e below... Maybe someone can come up with a good rule for garbage. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] junk mail follows NEVER AGAIN BE EMBARRASSED ABOUT YOUR SIZE GainzwfkbPro has helped over 700,000 men worldwideSome benefits include: * Gain up to 3 Full Inche

[SAtalk] rd.yahoo.com

s to Yahoo! for making is easier on spammers to obfuscate their spam site names... Is there a good reason not to just score those rd.yahoo's high? Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention

[SAtalk] RBL-PLUS screws with SA intent

hes if the returned IP address is 127.1.0.2 - which is the one assosiated with DUL? [man, could I use any more acronyms? (AKA: MCIUAMA?)] -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6

RE: [SAtalk] Really OT: Microsoft buys out RAV

Oh dear... We were just looking into purchasing their Sendmail Libmilter product, too. Guess RAV's slogan will change to "Worry less! MICROSOFT IS WATCHING". * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/ * (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area *

[SAtalk] Gibberish email addresses

this be of use? The affects would be small but I'd imagine every little bit helps. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed

RE: [SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

> I may be wrong, but it seems to me, that your problem is neither with qmai > or SA but rather with the amount of swap space available to your OS. You > need to expand or recreate the swap partition. Just my 2 cents. Thanks for your response. You can read my other post as well, but it seems incre

RE: [SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

> I just noticed our firewall was blocking egress traffic on tcp port 2703 > which SA uses for razor. Once I opened this port on the firewall, > things seemed to speed up. I'm not completely sure, but I suspect this > may be only part of the problem. After opening up port 2703 on the firewall SA

Re: [SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

I just noticed our firewall was blocking egress traffic on tcp port 2703 which SA uses for razor. Once I opened this port on the firewall, things seemed to speed up. I'm not completely sure, but I suspect this may be only part of the problem. later, j -Original Message- From: Ja

[SAtalk] Problems with SpamAssassin and qmail

I'm using qmail 1.03, SpamAssassin 2.55, Perl v5.8.0, and procmail v3.22 to run a STMP gateway server to filter spam. This system is a dedicated SMTP/SpamAssassin server and does nothing else. I'm not sure if SA is overloading the system because of the high volume of mail, or if it's mis-configure

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

their objectclass if not then you can not log in but you can see their ID. jason Tony Earnshaw wrote: Keith Olmstead wrote: I am sorry, I just got caught up in something else and forgot to add version #s. Please forgive me. Believe it or not I don't even believe that pam_ldap is installed. n

Re: [SAtalk] Converting away from site-wide

box :-) Make up a "raw.domainname" subdomain: that way, if a 2nd+ person needs to be excluded as well, you can just move them to the subdomain too. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 P

Re: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin

ff ;-)" There: that puts the onus back on the site administrator - rather than the end user OR SpamAssassin. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6

Re: [SAtalk] Qmail integration problem.

told to run softlimit in the first place. This is totally documented in Qmail-Scanner: please spend some time and reconfigure so that softlimit is "enough" for your environment - instead of just setting a wildly high value. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigat

Re: [SAtalk] sharing Bayes DB between relays

er AND Bayes details in SQL. Of course, you'll have to build in timeout code to handle SQL outages/etc, and convert all the other proggies (e.g sa-learn) over too - but that does seem doable... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377

Re: [SAtalk] A better RFC 1178

On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Jason wrote: > > Has anyone looked at spamcalc? > > http://www.garion.org/spamcalc.php > > Here's a snip from the introduction doc. > > * What is dns spam? > Looking at their web page it sounds like their whole conce

RE: [SAtalk] using bayes learning from an imap folder

ith the MAIL::ImapClient perl module (2.2.7) in its examples area. Jason <<<<< CUT HERE >>>>> #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; use Mail::IMAPClient; use Shell; use Env qw(HOME); use Getopt::Long; use File::Temp qw/ tempfile tempdir /; my $imapserver = "YOUR I

RE: [SAtalk] Interesting suggestion for an anti-spam solution

Not only that but how many spammers actually get bounces or returned mail. I think you would end up telling nobody you have to pay, or maybe a small percentage. -Original Message- From: Aaron Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 8:51 AM To: Robert Fleming Cc: S

[SAtalk] self generated black hole list

for each spam or non spam seen up to a certain threshold. That way normal messages who only tickle the rules could still have a chance to get through. Just a thought... - Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by

RE: [SAtalk] Thanks for nothing

Bayes needs to have learned 200 spam AND 200 ham before it'll start applying the BAYES rules to messages it scans. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/ * (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area * (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free > -

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail, SpamAssassin and Mimedefang.

I brought up this issue a couple of weeks ago WRT Qmail. Same problem I'd say... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 -

[SAtalk] SA-learning from OUTLOOK

I have RH 8 with qmail and SA forwarding to Exchange is there any way or what's the best way to save emails to the linux box and have SA learn them? Do the email need to be in a special format? Can outlook save the message correctly for this? TIA

Re: [SAtalk] mail with ONLY html

;s Internet Mail Connector to be configure to send HTML-only mail. It can and *IS* been done. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C06

Re: [SAtalk] Did the acquisition kill the lists?

'm glad to see that the project is still alive and kicking! /jason > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:13:12PM -0500, Jason Levine wrote: >> I'm just wondering if the NAI acquisition of Deersoft killed the >> mailing lists; there hasn't been a post to any of the lists mirrored

[SAtalk] Did the acquisition kill the lists?

'll see as an official SpamAssassin release? /jason --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Sp

Re: [SAtalk] startup script for SA on Redhat 8

^C > The error messages here indicate that redhat-rc-script.sh is not a shell script, it's a perl script, make sure it starts with an appropriate '#!/usr/bin/perl -w' line, or the like. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Engineer

Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On December 19, 2002 12:55, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I need a more intelligent mail routing setup. The primary MX > for our domain is a sendmail machine that runs spamassassin. It scans > email, and then (via an entry in the

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?

uot;spammy" it looks before sending to our customers :-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 --- T

RE: [SAtalk] spamd log to mrtg

We're running a spam quarantine so I just have procmail call a script that just adds to a number in a text file (make sure to lock the file). I also track the top twenty spammed addresses and "Highest Score" (Usually in the 50's). Then there is a cron job that runs that uploads the stats to a cen

RE: [SAtalk] Is to identify yourself by return email necessary in the future?

with matching codes, move that address into the white list. -Jason -Original Message- From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:46 AM To: 'Ronald Wiplinger'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Is to identify yourself by r

[SAtalk] SA Woes

at all. Also, when I access the same message using the same command, but called from a PHP script, I get incorrect responses (assuming I use the -t flag, so that I can see some report regardless). Specifically, SA seems to think I've got a missing subject field. Any thoughts? --- Jason

Re: [SAtalk] new install gives error: undefined symbol:Perl_safemalloc

h is fine for perl-only modules, but will not work for modules that include XS components (like SHA1 and many others), you will need to reinstall all those modules. The easiest way to do this is with the CPAN module: 'perl -M CPAN -e recompile' will recompile all the modules that

Re: [SAtalk] System White / Black lists Ignored

ght through! I have tried this with many different domains, etc. As far as I can tell, the list is being ignored. I still don't know what / where the 5.3 in the whitelist is from either. I have restarted spampd and spamd many, many times too. >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1

  1   2   3   >