jason
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Keith Olmstead wrote:
I am sorry, I just got caught up in something else and forgot to add version #s. Please forgive me. Believe it or not I don't even believe that pam_ldap is installed. nss_ldap is 205 and openldap version 2.0.27, running on solaris 9.
I am currently arguing with a senior admin ( I am a lvl I) that does not believe that it is a ldap issue, but a
perl issue. I do relize that the openldap version that I am running is an older one, and upgrading it right now would not be as easy as one would think.
I will get pam_ldap installed once the other admin finishes a perl upgrade.
Ah. "Solaris" tells me all. I used to be a Solaris sysadmin (amongst other things.) I can understand the anguish that your "senior admin" is going through and his short temper.
When he's happy again, whisper in his ear that your problem has nothing to do with Perl, everything to do with pam_ldap - and let him sort *that one* out. If he can't, you're all set to step into his shoes, aren't you :P
Tony
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk