Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market
of english lit majors/grads.
On Friday 30 January 2004 08:55 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
> antidrug.cf.
>
> I'm not sure wether to bother with adding rul
thing).(com|net|org|info)?rid=[0-9]{1,5}
???
Regards
/Brian
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in An
Greg, please don't think that you know everything...
SBC DSL FAQ states:
Question:
Can I run dedicated servers with DSL Internet access service?
Answer: Answer last updated: 05-02-02
Yes, as long as you have a static IP address. The best part of DSL
Internet access service is that the larg
Yes but if you start comparing prices between companies that offer basic
no-frills consumer DSL as well as "business class" DSL where the only
difference is no blocked ports and maybe a handfull of IP's, you'll notice
Speakeasy's Residential no-frills consumer DSL with dynamic IP starts at
abou
Thought this was a little humorous... Habeas is Misusing their own mark?
-
Content preview: Thank you for your email to Habeas! This message has
been automatically generated in response to your email regarding
"Habeas Misuse", a summary of which appears below. There is no
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 03:23 pm, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> Why even allow javascript embedded emails?
>
One could say the same about HTML emails.
Think about the target MUA of spam; Outlook Express. This type of spam would
only work on O/OE or any MUA that used a JS capable HTML renderer to displ
This is a new one to me, seems the spammers are starting to learn javascript
now. I suppose a rule for detecting document.write() usage could be used as a
spam-sign.
--- spam body ---
registry = new Array(182,
179,76,60,26,233,201,167,222,59,117,
232,106,241,81,111,6,134,45,149,103,
231,156,105
. but will in the
future)
It is not in the spammers financial future to use the habeas mark..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Gerry Doris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Morris Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin talk list" <[EMAIL
Not the Habeas topic... it all the rave now... all the kids are talking
about it.. :) But yes, sometimes the little topics squeek by... but not
the major ones...
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Chipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
What's the proper way to suggest a new filter to the SA developers?
I'm getting a TON of mail with a bunch of random uncommon-but-real
words to thwart Bayesian filtering, combined with a single picture
link. Spamassassin is giving these only about one point apiece.
The picture link never seems to
Because that would destroy the Habeas idea.. all I did was nuke the URL in
the message.. pharmwhavetersomthing.biz and I have caught every single one
of them.
Disabling the Habeas is not the correct thing to do.. but you can do
whatever you want..
Brian
- Original Message -
From
any thing above 4.1 is spam
4.1 to 5 goes to one folder to check for FN
5+ to 12 goes to another folder for checking
12+ to 25 goes to yet another folder...
25+ gets auto reported to razor and like...
after all spam that scored under 25 get s a manual inspection then fed to
razor and bayes..
all
Here is the partial Auto Reply from Habeas.. where they tell you that they
most likely will not reply back to you, but will go after the abuser..
Thank you for your report of spam containing the Habeas headers.
[snip]
With respect to spam containing our headers:
Please know that at Habeas we take
ck is working, but I
assume adding RBL check for e.g. china.blackholes.us would be the thing to
do - but I assume this checks all IP adresses the mail has passed through -
and not just the originating one ?
Anyone ?
/Brian
---
This SF.net e
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:59 AM
> To: Brian Sneddon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61
> when sending myself a test message?
>
>
extent of my perl debugging ability.
>
> Thanks ahead.
>
> And I hope this is not on the first page of the docs.
Nope... Even worse than that... It's in the FAQ. :)
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/RazorInsecureDependency
See if that helps.
Brian
>
> --
> Michael H. Coll
unning SpamAssassin is using a private or global IP address. SpamAssassin
performs intelligent checks of the headers and when properly configured will
not result in the false-positive originally mentioned.
Brian
---
This SF.net email is spo
helpful in troubleshooting your problem.
Thanks.
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: Mitch (WebCob) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS in 2.61
> when sending myself a te
Check the documentation on spamass-milter,
specifically the -r parameter which lets you reject mail that scores at or above
a specific threshold.
Brian
From: Jim Viton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 12:14 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] SA - flag
Wont that \n at the end of the regex match virtually ALL mail?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:06 PM
To: 'Chris Santerre'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rule to block Paris Hilton sp
nf that it refers to and I am not at liberty to open a hole in
our firewall to talk to razor...
Any other related documentation out there or hint/tips/suggestions?
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert i
spamass.sock is a UNIX socket and will be created automatically when you
start the milter.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Robt. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Sendmail line
I installed Spamassassin
Try starting spamd with the -D option which will generate debug information.
That should help you find where it's crashing.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Sean Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk]
Have you tried:
header BLANK_SUBJECT Subject =~ /^$/
That should do it.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] no content in the subject
Hello list!
Can someone show
x27;m then
getting bounces of the bounces.
My question is...
Is it possible to discard such emails instead of bouncing? If so, how would
one go about this? Any online tutorials or a push in the right direction
would be appreciated.
Than
idy up the
installation instructions I wrote and make them available.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Kang , Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail
> Sendmail is and MTA not a M
dding the required macro to the Sendmail
config, or modifying the SpamAssassin code to accept (but not store)
whitespace before the newline character.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtal
ssed manually yet does not work when the email is passed through the
milter (and the pseudo Received: header added) I still suspect the problem
may be with parsing spamass-milter's psuedo header, but I've been unable to
determine for sure after looking at SpamAssassin's h
The default is for spamd to spawn multiple processes. The -m flag is used
to limit the max number of processes that will be spawned.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MY_OBFUJ,MY_OBFUT,MY_OBFUX,
MY_OBFUZ autolearn=no version=2.60
So it should be 2.60 ...
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen yo
rated SpamLinks_1
score SpamLinks_1 3.0
But incoming messages encoded in Base64 containg links with the above
domains are not recognized ?? Why ??
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in
sassin, but I'd like to keep things as they are, if possible.
Thanks,
Brian Knittel
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_| _| _| Brian Knittel
_| _| _| Quarterbyte Systems, Inc.
_| _| _| Tel: 1-510-559-7930
_| _| _| Fax: 1-510-525-6889
_| _| _| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_| _| _| h
On Thursday 20 November 2003 03:02 pm, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
> I can find it. I'm talking about going from 10 seconds to process a
> message without bayes and is now up to a minute to do it with Bayes in.
Could you give some specs on cpu speed, amount of memory, drives (ide/scsi/
rpm), maximum n
This functionality already exists in several milters that call or integrate SA
directly, namely MIMEDefang, the various Amavis based milters, IVS Milter,
and MailScanner. However if such were to be built into spamc it would have to
much more flexable than simple yes/no deletion (what about those
On Monday 17 November 2003 01:29 pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Godette wrote:
> > On Monday 17 November 2003 11:22 am, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > > :0 c : $HOME/.sa$LOCKEXT
> > >
> > > * ^X-Spam-Checker-Version:.*-$SAVERSION
> &
On Monday 17 November 2003 11:22 am, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> My solution is this little bit of procmail:
> :0 c : $HOME/.sa$LOCKEXT
>
> * ^X-Spam-Checker-Version:.*-$SAVERSION
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*autolearn=ham
>
> | sa-learn --forget
>
> Replace $SAVERSION with whatever appears in your version_
On Monday 17 November 2003 08:16 am, Michael V. Sokolov wrote:
> I've noticed message with such headers:
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
> antispam X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=ha
a more intelligent way to specify,
that mails from the outside couldn't be sent into my system, claiming to be
from my own domain)??
Regards
/Brian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsth
s
LOW and image content is there.
Can this be built into spamassassin or something
else? How are you all dealing with this?
Thanks,
Brian
Examining the code of spamass-milter it does appear that each header ends
with \r\n as it should. From what I can see in Received.pm though the
regexs aren't anchored to the end of line nor do they specify a specific end
of line format.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
7.0 trusted? No
While running spamd with debugging enabled does not show the header as being
parsed and therefore I don't believe it checks the IP against Dynablock. As
for why it's not parsing properly I'm not sure. I've tried both the new and
old versions of spamass
output when the email was processed by spamd with
debugging turned on.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?
I'm running SpamAssassin 2.60 on a p
The only trusted network should be that of mail-gateway.metrologic.com which
is my MTA. Katie.darklegacies.com is a host on a dynamic IP which is not a
trusted host. Therefore I would expect mail submitted to my MTA from
katie.darklegacies.com to match DYNABLOCK, yet it does not.
Brian
ies.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id
hA3GIPq0087830
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:18:25 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:18:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: testing
Me
y hints on what could be the problem ??
Regards,
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
Y
y hints on what could be the problem ??
Regards,
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
Y
Hi, Mark.
These aren't messages that you've already fed to the Bayesian classifier,
are they? Once it learns a message feeding it through again wont cause it
to learn it again.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Mark Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27,
mAssassin 2.60 on RedHat 9.0. perl-DB_FILE is installed.
Any thoughts?
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and hel
ined in some instances. What is the proper thing to do when $1 is
undefined? Return out of the subroutine?
-Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We
For the record I also began noticing many more 100% Bayesian matches after
upgrading from 2.55 to 2.6. So far it hasn't resulted in any false
positives that I'm aware of, but it has left me feeling slightly uneasy.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Ben Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Out of curiosity, what method do you use to feed your email into
SpamAssassin? Do you use a milter with Sendmail, procmail, et al.?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Daniel M. Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk
ISP's mail
server, though I too am seeing a problem with some emails matching the
DYNABLOCK rule despite being sent through their ISP's mail server. I had to
go ahead and rescore the rule down to .1 because it was causing too much
trouble (but I do want to see when it matches for diagnost
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
some of the configuration options have changed, I had to change
report_header myself
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net
tered except
for users A and B...a way of rolling it as suggested in the usage document.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That would depend on where you put the call to spamassassin. and how you
> integrate SA into your mail system.
>
> Brian Nath
ools.rpm
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin.rpm, then all dependencies are settled in one go.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See t
xactly is the best way to turn it "off by
default" and then allow filtering on just [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
-Brian
replaced when the real
released package is installed.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e ignorance.
It's in the tarball...
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A.
Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things I can recommend that speed things up:
>
> 1) Turn off RBL lookups
How much additional spam did you want to have to look at?
--
Brian Morrison
this cause sa-learn, and razor
reporting to behave differently?
Thanks
Brian
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
der is changed to :
.
End result, blank mail, because the MIME boundaries in the body don't
match the boundary definition in the header any more.
Not sure who to report this bug to within whoever is now responsible for
InterMail.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:38:48 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian Morrison"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will try again with the latest Razor patch in the 2.60 release version
> of SA.
Razor now patched correctly with contents of 2.60 Razor2.patch file, SA
now returning Razo
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:30:39 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:55:37 +0200 in
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Jacoutot
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> OK, here is my complete log; it does show lines about razor, but
>> there's nothing in my razor
y does not yet have 2.60 SA code in it AFAIAA.
--
Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do you know how far this has gone?
just how damaged have I become?
'Even Deeper' by
/razor-agent.log was last written to on
September 12th. This was the date I installed SA 2.60-rc4, so something
has stopped calling razor AFAICS.
Is this the Perl taint code effect?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ain, so
false positives can and do occur. If you delete the mail then, no
possibility to recover it again.
--
Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do you know how far this has gone?
just how damaged have I bec
spec file, updated the rpms, identifies as 2.60-rc4
AFAICS.
Slip up,or maybe I'm still running rc4 and the rpm -U failed?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
also tried to create the file first but still got same
> error.
Are you using spamd with the -x argument? If so that might prevent the
creation of user prefs. I get the same error here when running sa-learn
but it does not stop SA working for me. spamc is called by exim running
as user 'mail'
or sa-learn --spam.
If the Message-ID is already learnt as spam I'd like to be able to
modify the filter to bin the spam and then I need not review these
messages.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
.mimetmp
Description: PGP signature
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your system is being killed by Linux's OOM killer. The OOM killer in 2.4
series doesn't appear to be all that bright and I have had it kill init in
the past which results in what you describe (pings but services down).
You basically have two options, either add more memory or limit the number of
esian database - and maybe own
customized filters.
The problem is, that the domain is not hosted locally on the box running SA
and QS - but are relayed to the respective right mail-servers (the box with
SA and QS acts only as a anti-virus and spam-identification box).
Anyone
Yea.. I guess if I didn't get email for an hour I would wonder whats
up.. but you gotta wonder about the people who start to wonder after a
few days... heh..
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 20:34, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still
> > servers
> > t
By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still servers
that use the rbl directly from sendmail or postfix and the like.. :(
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECT
I though this was freaking funny... I've been reporting spam to the UCE
address for over 6 months, then today I get this (over 200 of them)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host arcticfox.ftc.gov[164.62.7.14] said: 550 5.7.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Rejected:< mydlsIP> listed at
dialups.relays.osirusof
k out this Limited Time Offer:
http://pharma-wholesale.24hhosting.com/
[Mail Body Quote off]
I assume you need to check for the V-word ;-) - assuming, that the spammers
might put a space, a star or a '-' between the letters... What would such a
rule look like
Where is the best place to configure this?
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at
?
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http
Seen this?
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/
SA comes out pretty well, although it was run without the bayes db.
Cheers
Brian
--
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Moderator for Mitel SMEserver Contributions and Howtos
from someone who has received heaps of these emails
in recent times.
Brian Scott
BTW it is impossible for the messages to be generated through any
agents installed on my systems. The technical details are complex but
no, I do not have a virus on my Macintosh.
--
e?
What I can see happening, though, is spammers start using a "salt" so that
the entire string is effectively random.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
I've raised it to 60 MB
now... But do I risk getting more "out of memory" errors with this setting
??
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Por
spamd/.spamassassin/ ??
I'm using SpamAssassin v2.55
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win
which
is why im writing this)
Any help would be appreciated. I think that since
its using this sendmail file to relay that its not getting to procmail to be
piped to spamassassin. but how can i fix that?
Brian
You know that's implying that spammers as "bright" as the average
script-kiddie? Isn't that being a bit generous?
/tongue in cheek
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 03:36 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> yes -- now and again.
>
> They're not really from Korea and China -- those are open proxies
> or rooted machi
hat worked terrific. Thank you!
For anyone else interested, heres my .procmailrc line:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| formail -I "Status: R" | dmail +Spam
Cheers,
Brian
--
Brian Klug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TYX.NET Webhostin
Hi-
I have SA working really well with procmail & IMAP (delivery via dmail).
There is only one more thing I would like to do: When spam is moved to
the spam folder, I want it automatically marked as read.
Is this possible? How?
Brian
--
Brian Klug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TYX.NET Webhosting $
From: "Fox Flanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:30 am, Fox Flanders wrote:
> We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch
> of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam.
>
The irony is astounding.
--
http://pyzor.sourceforge.net
Thanks for this. When is "pyzor discover" normally run?
Cheers
Brian
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Moderator for Mitel SMEserver Contributions and Howtos: www.contribs.org
RUSOFT_COM,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REMOVE_SUBJ,
X_NJABL_DIALUP version=2.55X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55
(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Regards,
/Brian
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David
DicksonSen
Ok you need to contact your ISP you twit! They are the ones that use
spamassassin to filter your email... So contact them
bkw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keoki
Kalune
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [
http://www.claraocr.org/
http://freshmeat.net/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Spamassassin-tal
I had this happen once.. it was spamd messin up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evan
Platt
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Jim Ford; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Multiple postings!
At 09:43 AM 05/28/2003, you wrote:
>
I have an older 2.50-CVS build that works pretty well...
Looks like its a 01/12/03 version... if you (Dan Kubilos or anyone) is
interested..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 20
Why not just make it an option for the mass-check app?
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:03 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] NOTICE: mass-che
-Original Message-
From: Brian York
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:12 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'RedHat Psyce list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'
Subject: [expert] Spamassassin +
CommuniGate Pro config
If anyone is usi
One could argue that the whole point of open source it to use the community
to build and test your app.. then sell the product. Deersoft did it..
Cloudmark did it... the only difference, Deersoft sold the company.
I understand that the developers need to eat and what not... but I feel
like I was
Let me be on of many to say, that it's a bad idea. Most spam addresses are
fake, and at best, you send it to an email address that is valid, but didn't
send the spam. And you create more useless net traffic. It's best to
report it to Razor, SpamCop and the like.. or use the trusty Del key...
-
release-quality?
|\/| Brian Kendig Set your priorities right.
\ /\ / ..__.brian at enchanter net No one ever said on his
\/ \__\ _/ http://www.enchanter.net/ death bed, "Gee, if I'd
\__ __ \_ Be insatiably curious.
Well.. since the list was spam free... I'd call it spam..
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002
as an enter.net address,
but I've never seen one.. )
Someone is in defense mode..
- Original Message -
From: "Jordan Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, De
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
