I should have worded my message differently... I was not accusing Cloudmark of spamming... but a spammer "pimping an anti-spam product by Cloudmark..." I can see how one may remotely assume that I was blaming Cloudmark, but I wasn't. (unless there is a steve at cloudmark that has an enter.net address, but I've never seen one.. )
Someone is in defense mode.. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jordan Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 10:13 AM Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Spam pimping Cloudmark... For the record, we had nothing to do with that message or its distribution (nor did we have any knowledge of it until you forwarded this). FYI, It's extremely silly to assume we had anything to do with it, especially if you knew anything about Vipul or myself. --jordan ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
