Why not just make it an option for the mass-check app?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:03 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] NOTICE: mass-check for 2.50 issue [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > Folks -- > > Don't forget -- mass-check will *not* automatically remove SpamAssassin > markup. This is a big deal with the new report format (recently added to > 2.50), so if you're scanning folders with marked-up messages, please run > "spamassassin -d" on them and rescan before submitting those results. I doubt many people will have messages from 2.50 in their corpus, but it's also an issue with older messages too. So... what he said, run "spamassassin -d". If you get warnings in your mass-check logs that read: # contains SpamAssassin markup, results may be incorrect: ... then mass-check means it! -- Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ anti-spam consulting ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
