I have an older 2.50-CVS build that works pretty well... Looks like its a 01/12/03 version... if you (Dan Kubilos or anyone) is interested..
Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Base64 Encoded not scanned man, 2003-02-10 kl. 20:38 skrev Dan Kubilos: > Recently, Base64 encoding that is part of a multipart email are slipping > past SA. > > Mime modules are installed. The logs show that the > message was scanned and a spam score was assigned. > > I work for an elementary school district, porn scores are set very high. > Users are getting messages with "fu--" blowjob etc. that are correctly > blocked from unencoded messages. > > I would appreciate suggestions on how to trouble shoot this problem. Either wait a couple of weeks for the official 2.50 release, or take the CVS with present incomplete Bayes and scores. 2.50-CVS from mid Jan is perfect with base64 mails. Later versions could be more uncertain, according to those on this list who should know. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
