Hello Robert,
Sunday, December 14, 2003, 11:25:06 PM, you wrote:
RN> ie. is there a way to conditionally do those offsite checks only if
RN> they are necessary?
RN> ie. my current score is less than required_hits?
You might want a variation on my mechanism.
I'm stuck with user_prefs here, and d
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:00:19PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> There's definitely a lot of odd stuff in the SQL code, and we need
> someone who would be willing to take it over and add the new things
> we need (like known-good ordering of user/GLOBAL/@GLOBAL blocks,
> and Bayes/AWL-in-SQL integ
There must be something else I'm missing - does spamd have to be started as
a non-root user?
There must be some reason it's not checking the SQL - I'm working backwards
through the calls, but there must be a reason - eh?
Thanks.
m/
---
This
Hello Ryan,
Monday, December 15, 2003, 12:03:34 AM, you wrote:
RL> I have been assined the job to delete all incoming mail before it reaches the
RL> mailboxes. ...
Are you using procmail or something similar? Should be fairly simple to
code a procmail script entry that sends everything to /dev/n
I've got spamd running with "-s local3" and "-D" to log to syslog and produce
debug info as a poor-mans _verbose_ option. Anyway, parsing through the logs I
noticed something which made me wonder if it's a bug in SA.
Here's the FROM, TO, and SPAM score from these logs for an email:
Dec 15 22:42:33
At 10:06 PM 12/15/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused here. I have just installed Spamassassin on the server. I had
a folder with a few spams I'd recieved and wanted to feed them to sa-learn
so it would recognise these types of email as spam. But when I run
sa-learn --spam --mbox spamdump
> Plus, Alexander may have been just counting up the total Bayes directory
> size, which could very likely bring it at least to 44.
> LANG=C ls -lah ~/.spamassassin/
total 68M
drwx--2 lan users 288 Dec 16 09:21 .
drwx-- 73 lan users4.5k Dec 15 19:27 ..
-rw--
> How did you calculate those statistics -- does sa-learn do this, or did
> you code up something for sa-learn's output?
I have written small perl script for this.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in
Tim B wrote:
> Hey I stumbled over this little gem of a marketeer, looks like they
> claim they can bypass any spamfilter. Anyone familiar with this group?
>
> onlinemarketingpros.net
>
That's funny, their website says in business since 1997, but their whois
shows different (10 days ago ;):
rs.
I'm confused here. I have just installed Spamassassin on the server. I had
a folder with a few spams I'd recieved and wanted to feed them to sa-learn
so it would recognise these types of email as spam. But when I run
sa-learn --spam --mbox spamdump it says learned from 0 messages (3
messages s
You can find the patch at www.tusc.com.au/Conf.pm.diff. Note it is for 2.54 only, but
should be easily adapted to suit any version. I needed to do this for a couple of
reasons, mostly because these machines are gateways for an MS Exchange Server, and
operate in our DMZ. Each user has several a
Hmmm...
under "man 3 Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" I see:
user_scores_sql_field_scope field_scope
The 'scope' field. In Horde this makes the preference a single-
module preference or a global preference. There's no real need to
change it in other systems. Defa
> Actually, it looks like I've got a config problem: When I saved this
> email to disk and ran it as my username on the mailserver, it scored
> 15.3 points. When I ran it through spamc as root, it got 9.6. Yet,
the
> first time it came through, it scored a measley 3.7 points! What
> gives? Hav
I'm using the latest 2.61 here...
Would be interested in seeing your patch if it's posted somewhere... I
imagine the sql_field entries are also useless on an unpatched SA.
Are there any silly field size limits? like 6 character passwords or 10
character table names?
If I had an error message I m
Hi David,
Check out this page from Chris "Hockey is my life" Santerre:
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/evilrules.htm
He talks about how he used the "REG2RULE.PL" script to automate writing some awesome
uri rules.
And here is the page for reg2rule (Many thanks to Dave Stead):
htt
Well SQL knowlege I have, my PERL is quite rusty though...
Certainly can test / give feedback on design concepts though.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Justin Mason
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:51 PM
To: Jeremy Zawodny
Cc: Just
At 06:48 PM 12/15/2003, Rubin Bennett wrote:
When I saved this
email to disk and ran it as my username on the mailserver, it scored
15.3 points. When I ran it through spamc as root, it got 9.6. Yet, the
first time it came through, it scored a measley 3.7 points! What
gives? Have I managed to zo
Hi All,
I am not exactly sure of what the problem is here. It looks like you are using MySQL
only for scores. I am using it for all user preferences, and had submitted a change I
made to allow SA to use a Query (ie multiple joined tables). Scores and everything
else have worked flawlessly sin
Hi,
When I run "spamd -a --vpopmail" I get this message every time an email is
handelend by qmail (in and out):
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/spamd line 1101,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1123,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized val
Hey I stumbled over this little gem of a marketeer, looks like they
claim they can bypass any spamfilter. Anyone familiar with this group?
onlinemarketingpros.net
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
Christopher Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a somewhat similar problem. On our qmail/vpopmail setup, we
> are running Spam Assassin via spamd/spamc, and a short maildrop script
> is used for the SA-enabled domains to tag and deliver mail.
>
> This works great, so far, but our mail log
Hi All..
Are there any plans to store all bayes/awl related tokens etc inside
a mysql database? Currently i have a server farm with 10 SA dedicated
servers which are handling just over 350 000 mailboxes.. Wouldnt it
be better to have everything updating one central place? (having
it inside a mysql
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Zawodny writes:
>On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:00:19PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>> Mitch (WebCob) writes:
>> > Not sure if I should be posting this here or sending to jengland... I
>> > already did that though...
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance for
Actually, it looks like I've got a config problem: When I saved this
email to disk and ran it as my username on the mailserver, it scored
15.3 points. When I ran it through spamc as root, it got 9.6. Yet, the
first time it came through, it scored a measley 3.7 points! What
gives? Have I manage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I've been running SA for about a year on this particular server, and
I've never noticed it until today, but when using the -a flag with -c, SA is
trying to create user preference files for users that don't exist.
I'm using qmail, vpopmail, and SA, and I've got a cat
Hi All,
I have a rather large list of domains that I've collected that I am wanting
to block. Does anyone have a "bulk admin tool" of sorts that I could use to
make SA rules?
I only want to block based on URI's with these domains in them and have a
standard score that I would like to assign to a
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:00:19PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Mitch (WebCob) writes:
> > Not sure if I should be posting this here or sending to jengland... I
> > already did that though...
> >
> > Thanks in advance for looking at this...
>
I've recently heard people say it works... not that it's perfect, but for
anyone to take over it sure would help if getting started according to the
docs was possible ;-) So that said, I await someone to show me what I
missed.
I really did read it.
I would think that a connection error would be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mitch (WebCob) writes:
> Not sure if I should be posting this here or sending to jengland... I
> already did that though...
>
> Thanks in advance for looking at this...
There's definitely a lot of odd stuff in the SQL code, and we need
someone who w
At 05:49 PM 12/15/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you don't specify a user for spamd to run as, does it run as nobody?
I'm not specifying a user.
Well, spamd will start as root, and if spamc doesn't have a user specified
AND spamc is run as root, spamd will fall back to nobody.
In general, wi
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:38:59 -0600, Brad Koehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any spammer worth his salt runs his message through SA and other
> popular anti-spam tools as best he can. Most of SA is relatively
> static and slow to respond to changes in message content. The problem
> comes in a few
Not sure if I should be posting this here or sending to jengland... I
already did that though...
Thanks in advance for looking at this...
Any idea what I'm missing? The DBI tests did show success... I've also tried
with a 127.0.0.1:3306 fir the dsn - now luck there either...
I intentionally made
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:57 PM 12/15/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm using qmail, vpopmail, and SA, and I've got a catchall setup.
>> When sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], SA is creating
>> directories in /, as "/no such user [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
>
> sounds like th
At 04:57 PM 12/15/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using qmail, vpopmail, and SA, and I've got a catchall setup. When
sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], SA is creating directories in /,
as "/no such user [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
sounds like the user_prefs directory is all screwed up... SA is prob
Hello, I've been running SA for about a year on this particular server, and
I've never noticed it until today, but when using the -a flag with -c, SA is
trying to create user preference files for users that don't exist.
I'm using qmail, vpopmail, and SA, and I've got a catchall setup. When
sendin
I just downloaded it a few weeks ago (perhaps I just missed 2.61?). The
tarball expanded to a directory called "Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60" and
spamassassin -V returns "SpamAssassin version 2.60"
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:52 PM 12/15/2003, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
The documentation suggests that t
At 03:52 PM 12/15/2003, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
The documentation suggests that this feature is turned on by default, with
a factor of 0.5 -- however, in my installation, I see absolutely no sign
of an auto-whitelist file anywhere (let alone where it is supposed to
be). I tried setting use_auto
I'm playing with a rceent installation, trying to understand the
practical effects of various configuration options -- and have just
turned my eye to auto whitelists.
The documentation suggests that this feature is turned on by default,
with a factor of 0.5 -- however, in my installation, I see
Any spammer worth his salt runs his message through SA and other
popular anti-spam tools as best he can. Most of SA is relatively static
and slow to respond to changes in message content. The problem comes in
a few areas like checks against Received headers (since the spammer may
be using tho
At Mon Dec 15 15:12:42 2003, Gary Smith wrote:
>
> Rubin,
>
> About a week ago a guy asked how to use SA to check the emails
> before he sent them for some mail list (or some private promo
> thing). I think that problem is that spammers themselves are
> starting to use product like SA to valida
> It would seem to me that, for purposes of rule simplification, that the
subject and body of messages to be scanned should be available in
pre-processed flavors, some of which is currently available. Assume the spam
key is some thing like that Vuhee drug, V=P i=o e=a n=g s=r u=a (i.e.
Poensu)
>
>
With Larry's help, and a quick read of "perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf", I
determined that I need to add the following to local.cf to get the behavior
that I'm looking for:
report_safe_copy_headers Received
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Rosenman
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:
--On Monday, December 15, 2003 12:32:51 -0600 Chris Barnes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just thinking, I know spam is a big problem, and all that, but
reading the article, I don't know. I hate to sound schizophrenic,
but I mean, surely these guys are
Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just thinking, I know spam is a big problem, and all that, but
> reading the article, I don't know. I hate to sound schizophrenic,
> but I mean, surely these guys are not "hardened criminals".
Bullcrap. It takes someone who is very determined to im
Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Their database isn't wrong, as the IP is listed as being in a dialup
> range, which would appear to be accurate by my guess. I would think
> that the default rulesets are setup in such a way that it wouldn't
> catch that sort of hit, since they did relay thro
At 02:25 AM 12/15/2003, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I'm just curious in what order does eval_tests execute the tests?
Specifically are the offsite clearing houses only contacted whenever
my current score is less than required_hits?
no, they are always run whenever they are enabled
ie. is there a way
At 11:01 AM 12/15/2003, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I think in this case the spammer has found a way to fool SA because SA
2.61 simply
won't process this message.
My copy of SA 2.61 processes it fine
spamassassin
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
LOCAL_LO
I lied. the 2.6x DEFAULT config does *NOT* copy the received headers in.
I forgot (I did it so long ago) that I added the following line to my
local.cf:
report_safe_copy_headers Received
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-M
Welcome back from vacation, Chris! Here are a few FPs I've noticed in the
1.60 version of bigevil.cf
BigEvilList_34 bbspot.com A humor site similar to The Onion in content
BigEvilList_37 biz.yahoo.com Various places, including some legal newsletters
BigEvilList_153 snopes.com An ur
On 15 Dec 2003 11:57:57 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:35:18 -0800 (PST), Regis Wilson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> > I read some articles that urge against the {} notation. Can
> > someone enlighten me?
>
> It's a Perl efficiency thing. If yo
--On Monday, December 15, 2003 09:42:48 -0800 Gary Funck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brad Koehn
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Received headers disappearing...?
Oh boy am I dumb!
Never mind, the Received hea
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Koehn
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Received headers disappearing...?
>
>
> Oh boy am I dumb!
>
> Never mind, the Received headers are correct, it's the attached spam
> message that shows the ful
Oh boy am I dumb!
Never mind, the Received headers are correct, it's the attached spam
message that shows the full chain of headers back to the originating
server. That whole Received... with Spamassassin thing through me for a
loop.
My bad, sorry for the waste of bandwidth.
Brad
Brad Koehn
I've noticed that my Received: headers seem to have disappeared, at
least in messages that are marked as spam. For example, my subscription
to this list came in with the following Received headers:
Received: from mail.koehn.com ([unix socket])
by mail.koehn.com (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP;
Sean McCrohan said:
>
> Is there a way to get SA to return a list of the Bayes tokens a message
> matched (and ideally, the score of each)? I wasn't able to spot anything
> in the docs that would get me there. I'm tossing those messages back for
> training, of course, but I'm curious where they wer
In the past week or so, I've had a string of spam messages that were flagged
as BAYES_00. At a glance, I haven't been able to see anything obvious that
would have earned that rating, but I don't really want to go through all of
the tokens in the database by hand.
A simple Bayes-poisoned message I'
Hi Raquel
> I'm new to SA, and so far am pretty confused. I've been to your
> (Jennifer) site, but don't know what to do with the rules that can
> be downloaded. Are they added verbatim to local.cf? I'm sorry for
> asking such an elementary question.
Yes, pick the sets you want to use. Put t
On Monday 15 December 2003 12:06 am, Bill Landry wrote:
> Did you install the Razor, DCC, and Pyzor modules?
I actually didn't install anything; the install came from DirectAdmin.
I'll be in touch with them to see if there's any reason why they did it
the way they did and/or if I can install t
LOL WOW!!! I will fix these hopefully this afternoon! Thanks for the input.
I'm catching up on 1500+ emails :) Vaca was great, you all should try it
someday!
--Chris (Shoveling more snow) Santerre
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, De
Hello,
I am going to try setting up SpamAssassin with RedHat 7.3 and Postfix. I
was wandering if anyone has any good how-to's or personal notes on doing
this that would be great. I want to use the MySQL function as well. Any
help would be great.
Thanks in advance,
Dan
--
Dan Spray, D
I think in this case the spammer has found a way to fool SA because SA
2.61 simply
won't process this message.
On Dec 15, 2003, at 9:56 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I'm confused how this is suppose to work.
I've got this message that I think SA is ignoring.
I'm not getting any X-Spam headers at
I'm confused how this is suppose to work.
I've got this message that I think SA is ignoring.
I'm not getting any X-Spam headers at all over putting this message
thru SA.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 15 00:51:53 2003
Received: (qmail 10603 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2003 06:51:41 -
Recei
Gary
Fine, let them use SA to test their filth out. However, they can only get at the
stock SA. They can't have "my" SA and that has *my* rules in it, ie rules designed
specifically by me for my mail feed (or at least the company I work for) Also, they
can't fool BigEvil either then there is
On 15 Dec 2003 12:19:38 +0200, era wrote
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:01:10 -0600, Mike Vanecek
>> I ran into this installing 2.61. I just did a --force to get around
>> it, but wondered if that was a safe approach? What is the purpose
>> of perllocal.pod and why does perl-Mail-SpamAssassin have a
Rubin,
About a week ago a guy asked how to use SA to check the emails before he sent them for
some mail list (or some private promo thing). I think that problem is that spammers
themselves are starting to use product like SA to validate if an email is spam or not
so they can fool the system.
Has anyone gotten spamassassin to work with users in OpenLdap?? If so, can you msg me
and tell me what you did. I can not.
Thanks,
Keith Olmstead
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Keith Olmstead wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:32:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Keith Olmstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Regis Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> full JUSTIFIED_HTML /(\n.{74}=){3,}/
> describe JUSTIFIED_HTML Body uses 74 char wide, justified HTML code
> score JUSTIFIED_HTML2.0
>
> I read some articles that urge against the {} notation. Can someone enlighten
> me?
In your case, you should
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:25:38 -0500
Terry Milnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried dropping the comma after [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't see
> the comma included in the spamassassin.conf man page.
>
> Marcio Merlone wrote:
> > whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes,
Have you tried dropping the comma after [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't see
the comma included in the spamassassin.conf man page.
Marcio Merlone wrote:
Hello all,
I think my whitelist_to is not working, can someone help me?
On /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]# grep [EMAIL PR
Hello all,
I think my whitelist_to is not working, can someone help me?
On /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]# grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]#
And, on a spam report:
[EM
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:45:00 +, Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
spamassassin-talk:
> (If you're paranoid, you could make sure that you don't have
> confidential single tokens in there: bank account numbers and
> important --- i.e., non-Mailman --- passwords).
Right. I'm sure those who cou
On 14 Dec 2003 17:25:23 -0600, Scott A Crosby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to spamassassin-talk:
> On 14 Dec 2003 12:47:58 -0500, Rubin Bennett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And, has anyone given any thought to working the SA engine up in C or
>> something faster than Perl? I've seen many iss
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:01:10 -0600, Mike Vanecek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:09 -0800, Justin Mason wrote
>> >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569
>> Missed that one; I've just set it to be fixed for 2.62. It seems pretty
>> com
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:53:41 -0800, Fred Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to spamassassin-talk:
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
Looks like it (predictably) needs some Berkeley library to be
installed in order to link with it. If you're on Debian, this
typically means you need
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:40:07 - (GMT), JohnT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> i'd like to have a report sent to me with a breakdown of SA's activity,
> either daily or weekly or whatever.
> ideally, for it to list Sender, Recipient, Subject and Spam Score for all
> mails th
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:35:18 -0800 (PST), Regis Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> I read some articles that urge against the {} notation. Can
> someone enlighten me?
It's a Perl efficiency thing. If you are confident that your rule
works OK, you may want to change it sli
Good day, Ryan,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Ryan Lumsden wrote:
> I have been assined the job to delete all incoming mail before it reaches the
> mailboxes. Now I understand this is not recommend as "some" mail can be HAM.
>
> So what I would like to do is filter the labeled mail to a SPAM folder in
Did you install the Razor, DCC, and Pyzor modules? If you enable them in
local.cf without actually installing the modules, spamassassin will simply
ignore those settings. You can test by running:
spamassassin -D --lint
to see if it reports any errors or finds the necessary modules.
Bil
Is there a way to retrieve the MX/A record info from spamassassin via a .cf
based test? I would like to be able to build a score reduction test that
will help legit messages get delivered. Here are my thoughts:
HELO & "A" record & rDNS domain match -1
HELO & "A" record & rDNS & MAILFROM domain
HI
I have been assined the job to delete all incoming mail before it reaches the
mailboxes. Now I understand this is not recommend as "some" mail can be HAM.
So what I would like to do is filter the labeled mail to a SPAM folder in the
users mailbox, all mailboxes are MDIR so this is not a pro
You can add them to your local.cf file, if you want. However, I would
simply drop them into the same location of your local.cf file, typically
located at /etc/mail/spamassassin, and just make sure you use a .cf
extension. Spamassassin will read all files in that directory that end in
.cf. If you
I have started to get spam whose body consists of something like
a discussion of Collrige's poetry, in other words, the body of the message
is text that could be from a history book or literature book. There will
be one URL in it that is for the site they are advertising.
-Don
--
Don St
I'm just curious in what order does eval_tests execute the tests?
Specifically are the offsite clearing houses only contacted whenever
my current score is less than required_hits?
ie. is there a way to conditionally do those offsite checks only if
they are necessary?
ie. my current score is less
Hi Dave
Have you ever got any answer on this ? I am trying to use spamc/spamd with qmail
as well
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, David wrote:
> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 14:10:14 -0700
> From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin with qmail and dotqmails sending bl
I'm using spamassassin version 2.55 with Exim version 4.24, as supplied
by the hosting control panel people at DirectAdmin
(http://www.directadmin.com/).
My spamassassin config file at /etc/mail/local.cf has these lines:
# Enable or disable network checks
skip_rbl_checks 0
use_razor2
I'm using spamassassin because it's included in the DirectAdmin hosting
panel we use (http://www.directadmin.com/).
We use version 2.55, implemented with Exim 4.24.
I haven't noticed any improvement after training using sa-learn on
hundreds of messages and I noticed what may be an interesting a
86 matches
Mail list logo
