[SAtalk] Re: [RD] Help with Subject rule

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:13:11 -0500, Scott Sprunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: > I wanted to test a theory so I've been trying to come up with a > rule that will catch encoded strings in the subject of a message. > So far I've tried the rules below, but none of them are hitti

[SAtalk] Re: One persistent spammer defeating SA.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > /^reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED](\.org|\.net)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\.org|\.net)\$/igm > > This is probably a sufficient pattern, but one distinguishing feature > in the examples was that the same address would be repeated twice. Think there were instances with two different

[SAtalk] RHSBL Usage

Hi all, Is there a way to use an RHSBL list with SpamAssassin? In searching, I've found a lot of info for custom RBL details, but nothing on RHSBLs (domain based DNS blocklists). Thanks! Jeff --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux

[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

"Covington, Chris" wrote: > > On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is, > of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it > too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false > positives)... but I've weighted my scoring accordingly. S

[SAtalk] Re: Content Analysis

(Top-posting corrected. See for some useful newbie links about netiquette and email conventions.) On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:33:31 -0500, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

[SAtalk] Re: Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

stan wrote: > Yes, I just erviewd the firewall config. It will pass all trafic > originating on the innsied. I see that may not be a good general case, but > it should be OK here (Small home network). > > BTW, I decided to try (breifly) disabling all packet firewalling. Guess > what? cdcc still sa

[SAtalk] Re: Bounce / reject e-mail using Postfix with scores above n

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:04:37 -0600, Jake L. Wegman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: > I've read about procmail recipes for deleting mail with spam scores above a > specified, however I've not seen any mention regarding Postfix. Probably because if you're running Postfix, you'd lik

[SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:07:38 -0500 (EST), Charles Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: > As a side note, in a similar vein: >> While contacting Habeas support about a semi-related issue, I was >> informed that spamassassin should only be testing for >> 'X-Habeas-SWE-3: like H

RE: [SAtalk] Re: another SpamAssassin ???

is that an enti-spem salution? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 December 2003 07:51 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Re: another SpamAssassin ??? > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:50:53 -0600, Terry Shows > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> post

[SAtalk] Re: another SpamAssassin ???

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:50:53 -0600, Terry Shows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: > Has anyone considered changing the spelling? Just changing the last > i to an e (spamassassen) just might be enough. How professionol. /* era */ -- The email address era the contact informati

Fishing lesson (Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > I sent you the error message, I'm pretty sure there was no user associated > with it. There were tens of thousands of those errors in the log. I'm not > sure how to pinpoint the culprit. I guess I'll have to go to each user and > rebuild their database. Ye

Re: [SAtalk] unsubcribe

>-Original Message- >From: "Oktavia, Evelyn" >Sent: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:20:43 +1100 >Subject: [SAtalk] unsubcribe List-Unsubscribe: , -

Re: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

> - It is written in python ;-). I'm not a perl bigot, but calling > spamassassin or spamc from python has got to be slower than using the > Mail::SpamAssassin class directly. You run it as a background job, so the amount of time taken is almost invisible. On the other hand, feel free to back

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Help with Subject rule

>What I'm looking for are subject headers as shown below: > >Subject: =?us-ascii?B?MCBNZW4sIGl0IHJlYWxseSB3b3JrcyEgZnA=?= iwsgfb > I've posted some examples. You need to do it thus: header T_SBJT_ENC ALL =~ /\nSubject:.[etc.]/i It works for me, but not always (I don't use + or *, I always limit

[SAtalk] Razor and Spamassassin vs spamc

Any reason why I would get razor results against spamassassin and none when using the spamc client?   I've been running the spamc client and have not seen any hits against any of the spam. After replacing spamc with spamassassin the second message through reported this:   Content analys

[SAtalk] Re: [AMaViS-user] A "Out of memory" case

Claude, | RedHat Linux 9.0, all available patches applied | amavisd-new-20030616-p6, SpamAssassin version 2.60 You are not telling which MTA are you using. | The problem becomes known as the system was not more operable because of | nearly infinite swapping activities. "Out of memory" messages r

[SAtalk] SA newbie - sa-learn

Hi, SA configured rh9/postfix/email gateway/site-wide. I receive the following when attempting to run: sa-learn --spam --mbox /var/mail/spambox Learned from 0 message(s) (1681 message(s) examined). Is something wrong? "spam" is delivered to "spambox" mailbox. Thanks in advance. ---

RE: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

At Tue Dec 9 21:04:56 2003, Evan Platt wrote: > > I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat > rookie web designer.. What I'm looking for is a web site that has a form, > someone fills out the form, and it e-mails the contents of the form to a > list of e-mail address

[SAtalk] Error after upgrading to 5.8.2 and 2.61

After upgrading perl to 5.8.2 and SA to 2.61 I started receiving the following errors: Dec 9 19:06:54 mail.moregti.net amavisd[5233]: (05233-01-19) TROUBLE in check_mail: spam_scan FAILED: Can't locate object method "html_init" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at /usr/lib/perl5/site

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

I don't know why you are saying that SA does not filter e-mails, I does !!, I'm very newbiew on this but i did install SA on same server where Exchange 2000 runs and it's doing well.   The only mater is that i can't find the way to make white list; Sa is tagging as SPAM valids e-mails, can

Re: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

> IMAP Spam Begone () is a python > script that supports SSL, but has some other problems (it doesn't appear > to remember which messages it's already seen). Err, yes it does remember what messages it has seen! Roger --

[SAtalk] Re: Order of precedence with respect to user_prefs

At 10:51 PM 12/9/2003, mairhtin wrote: It appears that I *WAS* correct. There is still a matter of order of precedence with respect to the scoring of tests. Hmm.. maybe. You have proved it is using your particular user_prefs file. Your original problem was concern over settings "bleeding" betwee

RE: [SAtalk] Trying to skip some messages..

Hi Mitchell, > -Original Message- > From: Mitchell Baker > > I am wanting to setup that any message from systems within > our domain don't get sent to spamd... I have the following > in the /etc/procmailrc > file: > > :0: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ${DEFAULT} > # From system.rose-hulman.

[SAtalk] unsubcribe

--- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_i

[SAtalk] attempt

posting attempt --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://a

RE: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

I have a Perl subroutine called from a CGI I call deliver. It was designed to deliver quarantined messages to whatever location I desired. Although I call a file to create a message array in which I pass the reference $msgref, you could just create the array from the form. The RCPT TO array is a

Re: [SAtalk] FW: Can I auto report spam to Razor & DCC using spamassain?

- Original Message - From: "stan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It occurs to me that the world might be a better place if these databases > get updated as quickly as possible. > > Can I instruct Spamassain to do this upon detection, instead of waiting for > me to get around to reading my mail and

[SAtalk] P.S. activity

P.S., In an attempt to do something clever with the procmail.log file, I messed up where my SA-TALK was being delivered to, and hence my terror at no traffic coming through. I really *MUST* read the manuals more often. M --- This SF.net

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . .

Yup. cpan> install Time::HiRes CPAN: Storable loaded ok Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:47:09 GMT Time::HiRes is up to date. I've currently got 2.60 installed and working. It installed from CPAN without incident. I've also tried downloading th

Re: [SAtalk] Order of precedence in rule sets?

Matt, Thank you for explaining that so clearly for me. DUH! :) I should read more, but . So, then my problem is, I have users with differing sets of "thresholds" that they want to use. I have one client who gets all sorts of odd emails from the suppliers he uses in the Far East, most o

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:52:10 -0500 stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ..snip> Yes, I just erviewd the firewall config. It will pass all trafic > originating on the innsied. I see that may not be a good general case, but > it should be OK here (Small home network). > > BTW, I decided to try (breifly)

[SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . .

I'm trying upgrade on CPAN and I keep getting failed tests like below: t/spamc_c_stdout_closed.spamd start failed: log: debug: Score set 0 chosen. debug: Preloading modules with HOME=/tmp/spamd-57489-init Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at ../blib/li

Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers. Ugh!

That looks good (I wrote that email from home, so I didn't see the start of the thread with the details, sorry). There is another thing I forgot to mention last night that was also confusing me. We use SQL preferences here, so it might be a little different for you, but we have an entry for the

[SAtalk] FW: Can I auto report spam to Razor & DCC using spamassain?

It occurs to me that the world might be a better place if these databases get updated as quickly as possible. Can I instruct Spamassain to do this upon detection, instead of waiting for me to get around to reading my mail and doing it? If so, how. -- "They that would give up essential liberty f

Re: [SAtalk] Header problems

OK Guys, you are right, just a procmail configuration error... The message was read twice... and the most of the time SA didn't recognize it as SPAM (and it was right :) Tnx Luca Scrive Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 03:18 PM 12/9/03 +0100, Luca Palazzo wrote: > >i'm experiencing a strab

HTML Free version (was:Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers.)

Ryan Moore wrote: > Your postfix isn't stripping them right? I use amavisd-new and it >works like a charm. I do have $sa_tag_level_deflt set to -999, so it >adds headers to every email, but $sa_tag2_level_deflt and >$sa_kill_level_deflt are set to 7. I think the default for just $sa_tag >is 0,

Re: [SAtalk] New to SA

Rachel E. Hewitt wrote: New to SA and unix. I am using SA 2.6 with Guinevere and GW 6. It is helping a lot. I have spent about 3 hours looking through the archives of this list and have not found the answer yeta couple questions: 1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it

Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers. Ugh!

Ryan Moore wrote: Your postfix isn't stripping them right? I use amavisd-new and it works like a charm. I do have $sa_tag_level_deflt set to -999, so it adds headers to every email, but $sa_tag2_level_deflt and $sa_kill_level_deflt are set to 7. I think the default for just $sa_tag is 0, so a

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix - procmail - spamassassin config

Daniel Kaliel wrote: Hey At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I have it setup and where I am confused. My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do I need

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:34:14PM -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:05:42 -0500 > stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:42:28PM -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:32:23 -0500 > > > stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ..snip>

Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Mangiafico writes: >> Summary of major changes since 2.60 >> --- >> - updated to reflect new Dynablock DNSBL location > >Does 2.61 also fix the bugs and problems with DYNABLOCK and NJABL hitting >false positives

RE: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

W/O BCC the best thing is to recode the CGI script to send individual emails to each recipient rather than sending them all at once. For example, instead of: my $to_everybody = '[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; my $result = &send_mail($from, $to_everybody, $subject, $messa

[SAtalk] [spamcheck.py] missing file spamd.py

Hi, I'm using spamcheck.py to deliver mails from Postfix to Cyrus-Server via lmtp-socket. An older version works fine, but now it requiers a file named spamd.py. Where can i find that? Who provides the script? Google said nothing about it. spamcheck.py is shipped with the spamassassin-sources,

Re: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:32 PM + Martin Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Use bcc instead? Did I not mention this CGI I use doesn't support BCC? I guess not.. :) Evan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorial

Re: [SAtalk] New to SA

At 04:39 PM 12/9/2003, Rachel E. Hewitt wrote: 1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it just goes back to the dos prompt after a moment does that mean that SA is running without any errors? Yes, spamassassin --lint should have no output unless there are errors. If you wan

RE: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Evan > Platt > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:05 PM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script? > > > I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat

[SAtalk] New to SA

New to SA and unix. I am using SA 2.6 with Guinevere and GW 6. It is helping a lot. I have spent about 3 hours looking through the archives of this list and have not found the answer yeta couple questions: 1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it just goes back to the d

Re: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

At Tue Dec 9 21:04:56 2003, Evan Platt wrote: > > I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat > rookie web designer.. What I'm looking for is a web site that has a form, > someone fills out the form, and it e-mails the contents of the form to a > list of e-mail addresse

Re: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

Sometime in December Evan Platt assaulted the keyboard and produced: | Any suggestions? have you tried BCC?, it's much more polite than sticking a whole bunch of email addresses in a TO field. -- --

[SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat rookie web designer.. What I'm looking for is a web site that has a form, someone fills out the form, and it e-mails the contents of the form to a list of e-mail addresses. Essentially, it's for a volunteer fire department, we g

Re: [SAtalk] Sender of email receive a copy of email sent in his/her Inbox!

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:06 PM -0500 Kooi Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are running running SA 2.6 with Postfix. in Mandrake 9.2. This server > acts as a spam filter that forwards mail to an actual mail server. > Everything works well (filtering, tagging and forwarding) except fo

Re: [SAtalk] a couple questions.

At 03:27 PM 12/9/2003, John Harrold wrote: i asked some friends and they seem to think that by putting this file in my ~/.spamassassin/ directory it will be used automatically. is this true? or is there a source or include command i can put in my user_prefs file? That is not true... in ~/.spamassas

Re: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

Roger, Sorry about that, when I ran it again just now it did remember which messages it has seen. If I'm reading the code right, here some other things I see: - It is written in python ;-). I'm not a perl bigot, but calling spamassassin or spamc from python has got to be slower than using the M

[SAtalk] a couple questions.

i want to use the big evil list found here: http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf i asked some friends and they seem to think that by putting this file in my ~/.spamassassin/ directory it will be used automatically. is this true? or is there a source or include command i can

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message It depends on which networks you want to run SA for.  I currently have it running on all of my networks, like you last example. -Original Message-From: kittonian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:47 PMTo: Vee Persaud; [EMAIL PROTECTED];

[SAtalk] Sender of email receive a copy of email sent in his/her Inbox!

We are running running SA 2.6 with Postfix. in Mandrake 9.2. This server acts as a spam filter that forwards mail to an actual mail server. Everything works well (filtering, tagging and forwarding) except for one thing - every sender of email to us gets a copy of the email in his/her Inbox.

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message OK!  I figured it out.  Here's what the tcp.smtp should look like to still catch all the SPAM but also have the system setup with smtp-auth so that everyone no matter what has to authenticate prior to relaying.   127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QS_SPAMASSASSIN="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qma

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Help with Subject rule

In a post by Jmason back on Sept. 9 2003, try this: header MK_CHARSET_IN_SUBJECT Subject:raw =~ /ISO\-8859/i Change the chrset part to whatever you want, this should allow you access to un-decoded subject. Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ 810-794-440

[SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

At 11:11 AM 12/9/2003, Scott A Crosby wrote: The plan was abuse copyright and trademark law in order to engage in anticompetetive lock-in. IE, to require payment from people wishing to produce games, people who didn't pay would be forced to commit 'trademark and copyright infringement'. The lock-in

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message Thanks for your help.  I think it's working now.  However, that being said, I changed the qmail-scanner-queue.pl to remove the -c and then modified my tcp.smtp to be this:   127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl":allow,QS_SPAMASSASSIN="",QM

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:12 AM -0500 Charles Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Will RPM's be out soon? Easy enough to make from the tarball: rpmbuild -ta xx.tar.gz This works for any tarball package that includes a specfile.

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

At 02:11 PM 12/9/2003, Scott A Crosby wrote: The plan was abuse copyright and trademark law in order to engage in anticompetetive lock-in. IE, to require payment from people wishing to produce games, people who didn't pay would be forced to commit 'trademark and copyright infringement'. The lock-in

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message /etc/tcp.smtp file : ... 10.10.10.10:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" ... Add  QS_SPAMASSASSIN="" Also, make sure that spamd runs without the -c option.   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:18:35 -0800, Kelson Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Charles Gregory wrote: > > There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas > > headers. They could simply be faked. Habeas Corp says that they make > > use of copyright laws to pursue legal action against spamm

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:32:23 -0500 stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ..snip> > > > Thanks for the helpful reply. > > Do you think my firewall is blocking, even given the traceroute that shows > I can get to one of the servers? I'm behin a NAT'ing OpenBSD firewall if > that matters. > Yes, becaus

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

Interesting mail header on this message: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from intrepid.intrepid.com (intrepid.intrepid.com [192.195.190.1]) by screamer.intrepid.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9H4rhE029668 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:04:53 -0800 Rece

[SAtalk] Re: Bug#223399: spamassassin: not_ok_languages, no way to split Chinese

D> I'm confused. There is no need for not_ok_languages, as you can simply D> list all languages but the one you want in ok_languages. Furthermore, D> few people wish to receive mail in every language. Just like white list / black list, you have both because it would be a pain to try to keep track

Re: [SAtalk] Habeas test

Charles Gregory wrote: There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas headers. They could simply be faked. Habeas Corp says that they make use of copyright laws to pursue legal action against spammers Which they have already done, successfully: http://habeas.com/companyPressPR.html but

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

I understand now what you are asking. The fundamental problem still remains the same. If you send an email to system X who thinks it's spam what does it take to make system X think that it's not spam as it really is a valid email. If you are sending emails out like this then they are either 1

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

At 09:55 AM 12/9/2003, you wrote: --On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:33 PM -0500 "Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally > where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less > command-line

[SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message I am running Debian Linux and have Qmail, VPopMail, and Qmail-Scanner in place.  I have installed 2.61 SA and it runs perfectly from the command line using the spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out test that the INSTALL doc talks about.  I have compiled qmail-scanner wi

[SAtalk] Postfix - Procmail - SpamAssassin Config

Nevermind all, sorry for the post, I got it working. Thanks, Daniel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything f

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:33 PM -0500 "Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally > where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less > command-line access. Which would be useless,

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.61 Install Issue

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:54:06AM -0600, Ben Story wrote: > This is on a RH8.0 box. just for kicks, try "unset LANG" or "export LANG=C", then try the Makefile again. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Where's the ladies' sty? I desperately need to powder my snout."

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

The answer to your question, Gary... We are an incentives marketing firm with an affiliate element. Our members can send virtual promotions from their account to friends, family, colleagues, etc; however, some email services such as Hotmail, Yahoo, etc appear to be blocking these promotions. So

RE: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

Appologies, I've solved my own problem. (I *always* forget to turn DCC back off) Adding score DCC_CHECK 0 to my local.cf right now. :) -Original Message- From: Mark Muller Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation Hey al

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

The better question is why? Why would you need to scan your email before sending it? Are you trying to generate a threshold to see how much spam related content can go into an email before SA marks it or are you trying to find a way to get around SA? Gary Smith -Original Message- F

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less command-line access. As for correcting the items listed in my original post, I am looking for an example of the correct content that should be included i

[SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

Hey all, Just an observation with my 2.61 upgrade this morning. Scan times on mails are averaging about 6 seconds, and moving into the 10 second range at times. My average scan time on 2.60 was about 2 seconds, 4 seconds if things were really bogged down. I'm curious if anyone else sees this hap

Re: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

At 12:01 PM 12/9/2003, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) wrote: 1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a Content Checker available that I may use on my respective server that allows me to checked my content before sending it out via email, etc. I like the tool at Lyris BUT I

[SAtalk] Re: IMAP only?

On 9 Dec 2003 David Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I was using procmail to run spamassassin, but our mail server has been > changed to run the Cyrus IMAP server (with sieve) on a system where no > one has a login. > > [...] > > In a perfect world, I'd also like to be able to run sa-learn on a r

[SAtalk] Content Analysis

Hello Fellow SPAMASSASSIN Members... I am new to this list and I have a few questions that would really help out a lot.   1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a Content Checker available that I may use on my respective server that allows me to checked my content b

[SAtalk] SA 2.61 Install Issue

I'm having problems both with the tar.gz download and with CPAN. The error I get is as follows: CPAN.pm: Going to build J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report text for users who want more information on your filter insta

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

> -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 AM > To: Charles Gregory > Cc: Justin Mason; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released! > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:12:46AM -0500, Charles Grego

RE: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

Scott, Thanks for the response, but I have no access to our e-mail server other than IMAP. So, I don't think I can tell sendmail to use the milter that runs SA. On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:58, Scott Sprunger wrote: > We use Cyrus, Sendmail, SpamAssassin and Sieve. > > Sendmail uses an INPUT_MAIL

[SAtalk] upgrade 2.44 to 2.60

I did an upgrade/install from 2.44 to 2.60 and I'm not sure what is going on? I installed 2.60 (tgz file) everything went ok. but had error messages in my mail log telling me that i need 2.44 but running 2.60. I unistalled both versions and reinstalled 2.60 and now it's not working. I'm using

[SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

> Summary of major changes since 2.60 > --- > - updated to reflect new Dynablock DNSBL location Does 2.61 also fix the bugs and problems with DYNABLOCK and NJABL hitting false positives for different header issues and mailserver configs? Just want to make sure b

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:34:59AM -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > DCC has been one of the more difficult things for me to setup, but I like it a lot. > > You need to run only one of the dcc programs, depending on your needs. Run dccd if > you want to be a DCC server and you have registered on the

Re: [SAtalk] reject messages

Hi, [Note: please set your mailer to wrap lines] On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:01:24 -0500 "gentian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a baby to spamassassin and before I start getting my hands dirty on > it I am still collecting information about it. > No Spam Today for windows (which implements spamas

Re: [SAtalk] I have encountered a strange problem.

At 10:59 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Paul Hirschorn wrote: I found out the way it does this is just by initially tagging that users email message as -100 points as soon as it is scanned and also getting auto-learned as a result because it is below the minimum ham score. Is there a bug fix for this Um, what a

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:12:46AM -0500, Charles Gregory wrote: > 1) Will RPM's be out soon? Yes, I'll do up some RPMs soon. > 2) It sounds like this release is mostly just rule changes. >Is there yet a mechanism (an easy way) to just update rules without >going through an 'install' pro

[SAtalk] Postfix - procmail - spamassassin config

Hey At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I have it setup and where I am confused. My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do I need all of below, or wil

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

> If you don't then you can expect exactly this type of > activity from Mcafee. > > Considering that Spamassassin is now the "preferred" spam > tool for ISPs, and getting some great press, they would be > stupid not to take this logical step soon. Exactly my point! I have had dealing with thei

Re: [SAtalk] Combine 2 Bayes DB ???

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:43:48AM -0500, Vee Persaud wrote: > Is there any way to combine 2 Bayes databases ? I have been running sa-learn with > as a different user than what I'm using for spamd and now I find that I have 2 Bayes > databases (bayes_seen, bayes_toks). I have run sa-learn on a

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

1) Will RPM's be out soon? OR 2) It sounds like this release is mostly just rule changes. Is there yet a mechanism (an easy way) to just update rules without going through an 'install' process? Thanks for all the hard work! - Charles On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > Downloadi

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

At 10:42 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: Would you people please get some facts prior to posting senseless blather. Replying to myself, sorry for the sharp-edged tone there. It is however frustrating when you offhandedly mention a simple fact, and people begin jumping to conclusions without

[SAtalk] Bounce / reject e-mail using Postfix with scores above n

I've read about procmail recipes for deleting mail with spam scores above a specified, however I've not seen any mention regarding Postfix. I've implemented the bouncing of e-mail using Postfix's header_checks (with spam score above 10). Add the following to your {/etc/postfix/main.cf}:

[SAtalk] I have encountered a strange problem.

I was using spamassassin in my organization and one user did not want to be included in spam filtering. The spam box is setup for multiple domains that are split between 2 machines. I setup this users email addresses in the global prefs to have ALL_SPAM_TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] I found out the way i

Re: [SAtalk] Habeas test

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jeremy Kister wrote: > It seems that spamassassin 2.60 requires all 9 Habeas fields to be included, > in order, in the header of an email, for it to recognize the Habeas mark. I'm just a little curious. There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas headers. They could

[SAtalk] Trying to skip some messages..

I am wanting to setup that any message from systems within our domain don't get sent to spamd... I have the following in the /etc/procmailrc file: :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ${DEFAULT} # From system.rose-hulman.edu :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ${DEFAULT} # This seems to work most of the time we when cer

  1   2   >