Anyone using 2.40 CVS? If so can you confirm that dcc reporting is
broken?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Caffeinated soap. No kidding.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
Steve Wingate wrote:
> # Added for SpamAssassin
> :0fw
> | spamassassin -P
>
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> caughtspam
>
> The above entry was taken directly from the documentation.
This is kind of a procmail question, but...
I think the documentation - the README at least - specifies a path.
Title: Spamd- will not add SPAM* in subject
Hi all
I am using running a test server on debian with qmail and spam assassin
Spamd is running with these flags -F 0 -d
It seems that spamd recorgnize that a smap is beening send to the test mailbox (I am using qmail maildir)
And it
Hello,
I'm using the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.30 port on FreeBSD along with
procmail 3.22. I'm having a few problems. I have this in my
~/.procmailrc file (procmail has been working fine for a long while)
# Added for SpamAssassin
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
caughtspam
The
I still see no evidence of a message-id being inserted into debug
logs to allow tracking. Or any evidence of time stamping.
This bug was supposed to have been subsumed and corrected by another
one, but these two factors have never appeared in my logs as of cvs
yesterday (2.40).
Maybe I don't un
Weyland wrote:
> but it's nice to have things like this to get my set-up
> at least slightly customized while I spend the time to learn.
I'm just a user, but I'd say, you'd have a hard time finding or writing
any spam filter better than SA.
Bryan
--
[Insert Maxwell Smart accent] ==>> Reply-To m
When I redirect mail (using "Redirect" from Eudora on a Mac) to the
spamassassin-sightings list it always bounce back to me with complaints about
envelope sender verification. I suspect that I am not submitting to the list
correctly but don't know how to proceed.
Below is an example of the bounc
Hey guys,
As a completely new SA user who doesn't know anything
about programming yet, I'd like to thank you for posting these.
I'm planning on buying some books as soon as I can this
weekend, but it's nice to have things like this to get my set-up
at least slightly customized while I spend t
Mike Scott wrote:
> I've set up SpamAssassin 1.20 on my account on a shared FreeBSD server
>
> (i.e. I don't have root access), and it generally works perfectly, but
>
> about one email in ten generates the following error (taken from my
> procmail log, with the address the email forwards to dele
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
> Are you guys fucking serious!!
>
> That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
> 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
You're wrong. Firstly, we aren't "blocking" those hosts, we are
assi
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:20:35AM +1200, Simon Lyall wrote:
> I had a look though the README file in masses dir. You end up sending in
> files with lines like:
>
> . 3 /home/jm/Mail/MissedSpam/36 SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK,WANTS_CREDIT_CARD,SUPERLONG_LIN
>
>
> I would guess you could easily convert you
Hi,
> shows that whitelist is applied, bumping the score down to change
> is as non-spam-status. But it is still getting mangled by
> mime_defang to a somewhat-unreadable form (straight HTML code).
I am not sure mime-defang option applies to spam only, I think that is
a general option that SA ap
Hi,
> I'm getting allot of problems with
> SA marking mail as spam that's being sent to a group/list, even when the
> recipient has been whitelisted.
When sending to a group/list, who is THE recipient? If I am not wrong,
a message send to a list of recipients on a single destination
machine, is
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Robert Strickler wrote:
> How does everyone feel about building the logic to create and maintain a
> database of unsubscribe/removes that actually remove an address.
This sounds like a worthwhile endeavor.
A bit of a digression:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson w
Excellent page. Here's some of my own local rules if anyone on the list
wants em. I think most of these are pretty decent for general consumption,
but who knows, I could be wrong :)
In several cases (ie: PORN_LOCAL_5 and EMAIL_PURCHASED_LIST) the syntax of
the regexp could be more efficient,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:53:06PM -0500, Robert Strickler wrote:
| How does everyone feel about building the logic to create and maintain a
| database of unsubscribe/removes that actually remove an address. I realize
| that a significant majority of these are simply traps to validate email
| addr
How does everyone feel about building the logic to create and maintain a
database of unsubscribe/removes that actually remove an address. I realize
that a significant majority of these are simply traps to validate email
addresses, but I am wondering if there is not some value in actually getting
o
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:36:18PM -0700, Steve Evans wrote:
> How can you tell if you've installed Razor properly and SpamAssasin is using it?
If you run a message through "spamassassin -D -P" you should see something
like "Razor is available". :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"To win, you mu
I've put up a little page of various local rules people have posted
recently:
http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/2002/0628.html
Please lete me know if there are corrections, changes, updates.
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postma
A *huge* map showing the relationship between spammers.
http://www.cluelessmailers.org/spamdemic/mapfullsize.html
--
Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
ICQ: 132152059
---
Title: Spamd- will not add SPAM* in subject
Hi all
I am using running a test server on debian with qmail and spam assassin
Spamd is running with these flags -F 0 -d
It seems that spamd recorgnize that a smap is beening send to the test mailbox (I am using qmail maildir)
And it ha
How can you tell if
you've installed Razor properly and SpamAssasin is using it?
Steve Evans
Computing Services
(619) 594-0653
I created 7 new local.cf rules from just ONE spam that scored only 3.0 on
v2.20:
body BADCREDIT1 /bad credit/i
describe BADCREDIT1 talks about bad credit
body BETTERCREDIT1 /better credit/i
describe BETTERCREDIT1 talks about better credit
body CANHELPYOU1/can help you/i
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | Has anyone tried GA on the various RBL tests?
>
> No. The GA and DNSBLs don't mix very well. DNSBLs (theoretically)
> can change at any moment, so a DNSBL check is really only meaningful
> for messages received at the time the check is made.
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Kevin G. J. Freels wrote:
> The whitelist_to section of the doc:
>
> whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If the given address appears in the `To:' or `Cc:'
> headers, mail will be whitelisted.
>
> As I read this, it says that the whitelist_from is for exte
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:29:24PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, tang wrote:
>
> > Just installed SpamAssassin on our Sun's Ultra10 running Solaris 7,
> > but it doesn't work:
> >
> > tang@bionmr3:~/bin/SpamAssassin 124>./spamassassin < sample-nonspam.txt
> > Can't locate Ti
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:09:41 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1.20 is really really old. It was old before I started using SA. Try
>upgrading to 2.31 first.
Sorry, typo. It's 2.20.
--
Mike Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
I need to ask for some support for the windows platform. Is there anyone that
can help me or point me in the right direction?
What is happening is that a message gets the headers added to it from SA but
then the mail readers can not read the headers properly. For example the subject
line vanishes
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:11:01PM +0100, Mike Scott wrote:
| I've set up SpamAssassin 1.20
1.20 is really really old. It was old before I started using SA. Try
upgrading to 2.31 first.
-D
--
The truly righteous man attains life,
but he who pursues evil goes to his death.
Proverbs 1
> Dallas Engelken wrote:
> > http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
> > Are you guys fucking serious!!
> >
> > That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
> > 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
>
> This has nothing to do with SpamAssassin. I'd rather not have to see
> this sort of abuse on
I've set up SpamAssassin 1.20 on my account on a shared FreeBSD server
(i.e. I don't have root access), and it generally works perfectly, but
about one email in ten generates the following error (taken from my
procmail log, with the address the email forwards to deleted):
procmail: Program failur
Hey All--
I know this has probably been covered before, but I'm a newbie so I
thought I'd ask anyway
I'm setting up an e-mail server, and MOST of it seems to be working :)
I'm trying to add in SpamAssassin support, but I need a little help. I
have tested spamc by doing:
/usr/bin/sp
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:45:35AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> | (I'm a bit sensitive about this right now as I just discovered that the
> | entire block of IPs that my new DSL provider uses, are in the DUL.
>
> Nevertheless, the DUL isn't
Hey All--
I know this has probably been covered before, but I'm a newbie so I
thought I'd ask anyway
I'm setting up an e-mail server, and MOST of it seems to be working :)
I'm trying to add in SpamAssassin support, but I need a little help. I
have tested spamc by doing:
/usr/bin/sp
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:51:22AM +1200, Simon Lyall wrote:
| On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
| > Dallas Engelken wrote:
| > > http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
| > > Are you guys serious!!
| > >
| > > That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
| > > 64.216.0.0 - 64.219
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:45:35AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
| (I'm a bit sensitive about this right now as I just discovered that the
| entire block of IPs that my new DSL provider uses, are in the DUL. And
| there is no other DSL provider in this area, the last alternative is in
| bankruptcy
No, this is mail from outside to a user inside; it's not mail
we're sending out. Accordning to the SA
Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt docs:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Used to specify addresses which send mail that is often
tagged
(incorrectly) as spam;
The whitelist_to section
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Dallas Engelken wrote:
> > http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
> > Are you guys fucking serious!!
> >
> > That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
> > 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
>
> This has nothing to do with SpamAssassin. I'd rather n
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> There can never be justification for blocking the entire netblock that
> is that large.
There's frequently not justification for blocking any other netblock,
either. You have to choose which blacklists have sane administrators,
and hope that others
Dallas Engelken wrote:
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
> Are you guys fucking serious!!
>
> That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
> 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
This has nothing to do with SpamAssassin. I'd rather not have to see
this sort of abuse on our list.
Matt.
The contact listing for that /14 is in error. That's the
justification. If SBIS cared, they'd fix it. We've certainly pointed
enough people in their direction to tell them to do so. Still not
fixed. They obviously don't care if their customers have problems
because of it.
D
At 10:46 AM -05
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Ron Smith on Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:59:53AM -0400:
> Does anyone know of a way to restart spamd to pick up a changed
> local.cf preferences file WITHOUT killing spamd and restarting it?
>
> It seems like that should be built in functionality.
> "BO" == Bill Omer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BO> been whitelisted, but the To: field contains the group address, not the
BO> actual recipient (which is in the 'for' field)).
BO> Example:
BO> by www (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g5QLv1gJ027650
BO> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26
Quick question, I haven't seen any answer to this on the list or
in the docs
I have set mime_defang (actually, set by default, I believe) in
the local.cf to disarm viruii, but this buggers up any HTML-based
email, even legitimate stuff. So I started to add the sites (like
Amazon, Travelocity,
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
Are you guys fucking serious!!
That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
There can never be justification for blocking the entire netblock that is that large.
Dallas
---
Sorry about the two messages. I thought I sent the first one through a
different mail account and didn't think it was going to go through.
Sorry about that.
Bill Omer
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> Omer
> Sent: Thursday,
howdy
I'm using SA with Mailscanner. my whitelist file is the mailscanner default
with 3 addresses in it. I have auto-whitelist turned on.
I got an email that scored -97.6, and listed USER_IN_WHITELIST among the
checks in the header. the sender does appear in the auto-whitelist, but is
not e
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Ron Smith wrote:
Ron:
Yes, I definitely did kill the process first, then restarted it.
-- Bob --
> > I'm running 2.30 under RedHat 7.2 (with security updates) and 2.4.9
> > (custom-compiled). I have the RBL and Vipul's Razor options enabled,
> > otherwise completely stoc
SA for Outlook is available for download
http://sa.reusch.net
Version 0.01.01 is an 874KB download. Follow instructions in INSTALL.txt to get up
and running.
I've been running it on Outlook for about a week and it's surprisingly stable. I'm
running Outlook XP (10.0) and would appreciate fe
Vivek,
You rock!! That worked perfectly!! Thank you ever so much!!
Jonathan Duncan
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > "JD" == Jonathan Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> the "cc -fno-strict-aliasing... " line needs to be run manually. run
> "make" then when it fails with th
Is there a way to make SA base it's rules on the For field rather than the
To field if it exists? I'm having lots of problems with SA marking mail as
spam that's being sent to a group or a list, even if the recipient has been
whitelisted (it's looking for the To: field for the address to check if
I'm running SA/spamass-milter on a mail gateway, which forwards all mail
(via esmtp) to an other mail server. I'm getting allot of problems with
SA marking mail as spam that's being sent to a group/list, even when the
recipient has been whitelisted. My question is, how can I make SA
(preferably
Does anyone know of a way to restart spamd to pick up a changed local.cf
preferences file WITHOUT killing spamd and restarting it?
It seems like that should be built in functionality.
I'm using OS X.
Ron
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http:
Vivek,
Thank you for your comments. I am not sure exactly how to do what you
suggest. Would you be willing to elaborate for me?
Regards,
Jonathan Duncan
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > "DF" == Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DF> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:31:5
> "DF" == Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DF> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:31:59PM -, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
>> Both processes game me this error message:
>>
>> cc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -O spamd/spamc.c -o
>> spamd/spamc -Wl,-E -L/usr/local/lib -lg dbm -lm
> Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
> say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with
valid
> DNS and reverse DNS.
While it would be "nice" in the real world to do this, many email
servers can ALREADY reject mail that does not have a reverse DN
Harry Putnam wrote:
> David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>...and then Harry Putnam said...
>>%
>>% I'm a little lost in installing spamassassin without using the
>>% ./configure approach. For example: How does one instruct the
>>% `make install' to use /usr/local instead of /usr?
>>
> I received the attached message today. I've gotten a very few like it so
> far this year, but that's more than I used to :-)
>
> I don't know that SA can trap it; it got 0.0 hits and looks, except for a
> manual analysis of the content, entirely benign. Maybe a rule for short
> messages which
Hi, all --
I received the attached message today. I've gotten a very few like it so
far this year, but that's more than I used to :-)
I don't know that SA can trap it; it got 0.0 hits and looks, except for a
manual analysis of the content, entirely benign. Maybe a rule for short
messages which
Harry --
...and then Harry Putnam said...
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
...
% > simply
% >
% > perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
...
% > esoteric VENDORARCHLIB-type dirs -- but it's the same format and you just
% > string 'em along the command line.
%
% Thanks David, I have a
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>>>Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
>>>say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with valid
>>>DNS and reverse DNS.
>>
>>Sadly ISP's aren't as on-the-ball as you are. I've been trying for
>>months to get my I
Folks,
can you explain to me why spamassassin wouldn't have picked this
up?
Jim
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:00:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Networking Decisions
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TechTarget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Free VoIP and wireless tacti
Duncan
Theo Van Dinter posted a patch about a week ago to get rid of the razor
debug going to stdout. Can you add it? If the debug is getting spit
out, then it breaks Mailscanner. So everytime I download CVS, I have to
add it in.
my %opt = (
debug => $Mail::SpamAssass
63 matches
Mail list logo
