On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
> Are you guys fucking serious!!
> 
> That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!!  The entire SBIS netblock.
> 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255

You're wrong. Firstly, we aren't "blocking" those hosts, we are
assigning a score of 0.5 to those hosts, and a score of 5.0 is needed
for an e-mail to be _TAGGED_. Secondly, the number is closer to
62,853,352 according to the website.

> There can never be justification for blocking the entire netblock that is that large.

Firstly, read their listing policy at
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.html. Secondly read the
evidence at
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.cgi?domain=64.216.0.0/14&submitted=1023869928&table=ipwhois.

Essentially, they have incorrect info in their WHOIS -- e-mail to the
IP coordinator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bounces. In addition, the netblock
is a known source of spam. (Sure, its a big netblock, and likely
little spam, but it's still a justification.)


If you don't like it, you won't like virtually all the RBLs. Run local
tests only (add the --local flag to spamd/spamassassin)

-- 
Duncan Findlay


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to