Sorry about the two messages. I thought I sent the first one through a different mail account and didn't think it was going to go through.
Sorry about that. Bill Omer > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill > Omer > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] For field, not To > > > Is there a way to make SA base it's rules on the For field rather than the > To field if it exists? I'm having lots of problems with SA > marking mail as > spam that's being sent to a group or a list, even if the > recipient has been > whitelisted (it's looking for the To: field for the address to > check if it's > been whitelisted, but the To: field contains the group address, not the > actual recipient (which is in the 'for' field)). > > Example: > > > by www (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g5QLv1gJ027650 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:57:02 -0400 > > > All messages that are being effected to not contain any 'list' > headers what > so ever (YahooGroups and Weather.Com both are causing me problems). > > Any help with this would be great. > > Regards, > Bill Omer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
