On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > | Has anyone tried GA on the various RBL tests? > > No. The GA and DNSBLs don't mix very well. DNSBLs (theoretically) > can change at any moment, so a DNSBL check is really only meaningful > for messages received at the time the check is made. You wouldn't > want to be doing DNSBL checks on messages that are a month old if the > owner of the IP has changed since then or if the owner fixed their > system (eg open relay).
I had a look though the README file in masses dir. You end up sending in files with lines like: . 3 /home/jm/Mail/MissedSpam/36 SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK,WANTS_CREDIT_CARD,SUPERLONG_LIN I would guess you could easily convert you pre-scanned messages (which would have the various RBL tests) into this format and send them in. -- Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
