Mike Scott wrote:

> I've set up SpamAssassin 1.20 on my account on a shared FreeBSD server
>
> (i.e. I don't have root access), and it generally works perfectly, but
>
> about one email in ten generates the following error (taken from my
> procmail log, with the address the email forwards to deleted):
>
> procmail: Program failure (-9) of

Note the SA version mis-type - Mike meant 2.2.

Ok, I'll bite.

Ask your system admins, but most likely it's the same that's happening
on my ISP's FreeBSD - the process is getting killed 'cause it exceeds
single user process memory limits - don't know whether this is system
configurable (seems unlikely it'd be a FreeBSD limit).  The reaper does
not always catch it, hence the intermittence.

On our system, the limit is 8meg/process.

Possible sollutions include, getting your admins to increase the memory
limit; using another Perl compiler in hopes that it will be more memory
conservative; or, and here I cringe, change SA so that it is more memory
conservative.  You may also want to see:

http://www.rocketaware.com/perl/perlfaq3/How_can_I_make_my_Perl_program_t.htm,

and some users on my system are getting some results by prefacing the SA
command with 'nice -x' (seen man nice) to lower process priority.

Bryan
--
[Insert Maxwell Smart accent] ==>> Reply-To munging, and loving it!

I struggle in vain.  My foot slips.  My life is still
a poet's existence.  What could be more unhappy?
- (Soren Kierkegaard - Either/Or)

(Don't answer that!)

Capitalism is one thing, but..  Sign the petition:
http://www.zazona.com/h1bpetition/P/facts.html

Proud ugly web site owner:
http://www.wecs.com/bio_ailinks.htm;
http://www.wecs.com/spam.htm
http://www.wecs.com/replytorc.htm




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to