Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamd

/etc/service/qmail-smtpd/run: #!/bin/sh # tcpserver arguments QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild` NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild` LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me` # qmail options ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH="0"; export ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH REQUIRE_AUTH="0"; exp

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamd

On 21/03/12 08:54, Matias Lesniak wrote: > # ll /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue > -rwsr-sr-x 1 qscand qscand 8,2K 2012-03-08 11:54 > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue > > What does QMAILQUEUE point to? It need to point to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue, not /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-qu

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamd

I've made the wrapper like this, as root user: chmod 0755 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl cd /usr/local/src/qmail-scanner-2.10/contrib gcc -o qmail-scanner-queue qmail-scanner-queue.c install -D -o qscand -g qscand -m6755 qmail-scanner-queue /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scan

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamd

On 16/03/12 10:57, Matias Lesniak wrote: > # ll /var/spool/qscan/tmp/ > total 16K > drwxr-x--- 4 qscand qscand 4,0K 2012-03-15 18:43 . > drwxrwx--- 6 qscand qscand 4,0K 2012-03-08 11:56 .. > drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4,0K 2012-03-15 18:43 bmail133184783157023867 > drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4,0K 2

[Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamd

Hi, i'm writting due to i've problems with qmailscanner (2.08) I've installed qmail on Ubuntu 11.10 and my first problem was that i don't have the suidperl support for that version, so i used a c-wrapper that comes with qmailscanner. Now i have problems with clamd... Problems: # /u

[Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamd

Hi, i'm writting due to i've problems with qmailscanner (2.08) I've installed qmail on Ubuntu 11.10 and my first problem was that i don't have the suidperl support for that version, so i used a c-wrapper that comes with qmailscanner. Now i have problems with clamd... Problems: # /us

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamdscan

Hi Salvatore, On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:27:48 +0200 Salvatore Toribio wrote: > At 7:05 +0200 2-10-2009, li...@penpal4u.net wrote: > >Hi Jason, > >>> > When I > >>> > upgraded to 2.06, I ended up with plenty of > >>> > > >>> > WARNING: lstat() failed on: ... > >>> > > >>> > in the clamd log file

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamdscan

At 7:05 +0200 2-10-2009, li...@penpal4u.net wrote: >Hi Jason, >>> > When I >>> > upgraded to 2.06, I ended up with plenty of >>> > >>> > WARNING: lstat() failed on: ... >>> > >>> > in the clamd log file and viruses go through. >>> > >>> >>> ? Well that is weird. Qmail-Scanner is specificall

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamdscan

Hi Jason, >> > When I >> > upgraded to 2.06, I ended up with plenty of >> > >> > WARNING: lstat() failed on: ... >> > >> > in the clamd log file and viruses go through. >> > >> >> ? Well that is weird. Qmail-Scanner is specifically designed to >> tempfail if an AV returns a non-standard error code.

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamdscan

Hi Jason, > > I've been using qmail-scanner-queue for several years without any > > problems. However, I had to update clamav and now > > qmail-scanner-queue has difficulties interacting with it. At first, > > I tried qmail-scanner-queue 2.05 and it would regularly crash > > clamd. > > Qmail-Scan

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamdscan

On 10/02/2009 03:14 AM, Christian Lerrahn wrote: > Hi, > I've been using qmail-scanner-queue for several years without any > problems. However, I had to update clamav and now qmail-scanner-queue > has difficulties interacting with it. At first, I tried > qmail-scanner-queue 2.05 and it would regula

[Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with clamdscan

Hi, I've been using qmail-scanner-queue for several years without any problems. However, I had to update clamav and now qmail-scanner-queue has difficulties interacting with it. At first, I tried qmail-scanner-queue 2.05 and it would regularly crash clamd. When I upgraded to 2.06, I ended up with p

[Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with permissions in ~qscand/.spamassassin subdir

Hi, I have an environment with the following softwares: I have a server running: - Fedora Core 2 + kernel 2.6.10-1.8_FC2 - netqmail 1.05 + ucspi 0.88 + daemon-tools 0.76 + patches (site lwq) - netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20060105.patch (SMTP authentication) - badrcptto.patch - vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqw

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with version 2 ?

At 5:54 +0100 17-11-2006, Noc Phibee wrote: >Ok Thanks, if i don't want of timeout, i delete the "-t 30" it's correct ? Not really, the default timeout is 600, if you really want to disable the timeout you have to set it to 0. " -t 0" Regards ST >Salvatore Toribio a écrit : >>At 13:11 +0100 1

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with version 2 ?

Ok Thanks, if i don't want of timeout, i delete the "-t 30" it's correct ? Salvatore Toribio a écrit : > At 13:11 +0100 15-11-2006, Noc Phibee wrote: >> Hi >> >> i have a big problems with the qmail-scanner version 2.01 .. >> >> >> I use it on a relay server with spamassassin. Before i use it wi

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with version 2 ?

At 13:11 +0100 15-11-2006, Noc Phibee wrote: >Hi > >i have a big problems with the qmail-scanner version 2.01 .. > > >I use it on a relay server with spamassassin. Before i use it with the >version 1.25 >without problems >after update to 2.01 version, that's work's a time (1 hours < 2 days) >a

[Qmail-scanner-general] Problems with version 2 ?

Hi i have a big problems with the qmail-scanner version 2.01 .. I use it on a relay server with spamassassin. Before i use it with the version 1.25 without problems after update to 2.01 version, that's work's a time (1 hours < 2 days) and after he stop the dialogue with spamassassin and a

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with emerging qmail-scanner on gentoo -

hello, it seems that i cant install qmail-scanner on my gentoo server,its either a glibc problem (that i checked with revdep-rebuild and said everything is ok, everything in the system compiles ok) or a qmail-scanner bug.. here's what i got : * sys-libs/glibc Latest version available: 2.3.5

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with q-s after upgrade from mandrive 2005 to 2006

At 13:03 +0200 16-10-2005, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: Hi, I did an upgrade of the distribution and now when I send email I get: 451 qq temporarary problem (4.3.0) and mail is not sent When I switch to qmail-queue it works but with qmail-scanner-queue.pl it does not. I tried running qmail-scanner-

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with q-s after upgrade from mandrive 2005 to 2006

Hi, I did an upgrade of the distribution and now when I send email I get: 451 qq temporarary problem (4.3.0) and mail is not sent When I switch to qmail-queue it works but with qmail-scanner-queue.pl it does not. I tried running qmail-scanner-queue.pl and I got a message 'can't find suidperl', s

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

> > 10-15 mails PER SECOND and your running on a P3-1gHz?? This is > seriously underpowered for this type of mail load. Not to mention you > should have more ram...atleast a gig. I realize that this load is not > consistent, but to be able to handle these periods you really are going > to have t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

ag 28 juni 2005 19:21 To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT Maybe it is related whith my other problem: = I'm using qmail-scanner with f-prot. Fro

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

Pamcho wrote: That's the point... I don't know why they are NOT delivered... Are local mails, and in the status of the local delivering in the log I see that the max concurrency is not reached. It's a temporary problem. Some time later they are delivered. How much time t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

> > > > Take a look at the content of the messages in the queue. > > And investigate why they are not delivered ... > > > > Bye, > > > > Joost > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

e not delivered ... > > Bye, > > Joost > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Pamcho > Sent: dinsdag 28 juni 2005 18:26 > To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-gener

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT I have qmail-scanner with f-prot. In some moments I receive up to 10-15 mails/second. In this moments, when I do: # qmHandle -s I see the local queue growing up very fast. Why is

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

I have qmail-scanner with f-prot. In some moments I receive up to 10-15 mails/second. In this moments, when I do: # qmHandle -s I see the local queue growing up very fast. Why is this? -

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with virus notifications sent to "admin"

I've found a few questions regarding this problem in the mailing list archives, but not really any answers. When I installed qmail-scanner 1.25, I used the "--notify admin" setting. I want all virii detected to be reported to my admin address, but not to the users. When I run test_installatio

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with ownership of qmail-scanner-queue.pl

Hi allI found in this forum many people that told about my problem. So I try to fix it as in the reply post but without success.I Installed Q-S 1.25 in my mandrake 10.1 with perl 5.8.5. I compiled maildrop-1.8.0 with the --enable-maildrop-uid=qscand option and everything went ok.when i compile Q-S

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with qmail-scanner-1.24 (with QMS) and Kaspersky Version 5.0.4.0/RELEASE build #3

Matt Martin wrote: Hi, Ive used Qmailrocks.org on this one. (Have used before with Clam without issues, however, using Kaspersky this time) I understand that ask Kaspersky changed the way things worked in the latter versions of the scanner, that is no longer works (or works with difficulty)? If I t

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with qmail-scanner-1.24 (with QMS) and Kaspersky Version 5.0.4.0/RELEASE build #3

Hi, Ive used Qmailrocks.org on this one. (Have used before with Clam without issues, however, using Kaspersky this time) I understand that ask Kaspersky changed the way things worked in the latter versions of the scanner, that is no longer works (or works with difficulty)? If I take the line out

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with qmail-scanner-1.24 (with st patch)

Hi, I'm trying to use the st patch with qmail-scanner 1.24, but have run into a problem. qmail-scanner on its own works fine, but when patched with the st patch it seems to have problems finding/reading files. I'm trying to use the st patch with the --scanners-per-domains config option, and qm

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with setuid in 1.23

Hello redhat 9.0 Had Q-S 1.21 which worked fine for a long time, trying to update Q-s to 1.23 and getting this error: ./configure --archive no --notify none [snip] If that looks correct, I will now generate qmail-scanner-queue.pl for your system... Continue? ([Y]/N) y Testing suid nature of /u

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems detecting verbose_spamassassin

Hi, so after endless tries to get my configure script recognizing spamd/spamc, I've done an apt-get update. In my apt-archive was at this time already SA 3.0.0. After installing SA 3.0.0 i've had an error and I was forced to reboot my machine. After rebooting my configure script recognized my SA

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems detecting verbose_spamassassin

Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 22:07 -0700 23-09-2004, Jazzy Jay wrote: > Hi, today I've updated my Debian Sid System with apt. In my apt-archive was spamassassin 2.64-1 included. I also wanted to get qmail-scanner to be up-to-date. I've tried to update qmail-scanner from 1.20rc3 to 1.23 but t

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems detecting verbose_spamassassin

At 22:07 -0700 23-09-2004, Jazzy Jay wrote: > Hi, today I've updated my Debian Sid System with apt. In my apt-archive was spamassassin 2.64-1 included. I also wanted to get qmail-scanner to be up-to-date. I've tried to update qmail-scanner from 1.20rc3 to 1.23 but the current releasy won't

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems detecting verbose_spamassassin

> Hi, > > today I've updated my Debian Sid System with apt. In > my apt-archive was > spamassassin 2.64-1 included. I also wanted to get > qmail-scanner to be > up-to-date. I've tried to update qmail-scanner from > 1.20rc3 to 1.23 but > the current releasy won't detect my spamassassin on > thi

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems detecting verbose_spamassassin

Hi, today I've updated my Debian Sid System with apt. In my apt-archive was spamassassin 2.64-1 included. I also wanted to get qmail-scanner to be up-to-date. I've tried to update qmail-scanner from 1.20rc3 to 1.23 but the current releasy won't detect my spamassassin on this system. Is there an

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with qmail-scanner.

I tried qmail-scanner and I´m stuck with the problem that outgoing email is not filtered. I have a gentoo box, on my first install I install everything from portage (ebuilds on gentoo tree) and the second time on a clean system from sources at http://www.qmailrocks.org. My system use courier

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with c wrapper 2

Francisco Perez wrote: In fact the only way it works is running clamd as root ... :-( Run over to www.qmailrocks.org - poke through the slackware installation. That should help. One thing I found I had to do is once I installed qmail-scanner, I HAD to chown -R qscand.qscand /var/spool/qmailscan

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with c wrapper 2

In fact the only way it works is running clamd as root ... :-(

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with C wrapper

ez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:05 PM Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with C wrapper > Looks like you forgot to remove the taint option from the > qmail-scanner-queue.pl file. Edit the file, and remove the -T opti

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with C wrapper

Looks like you forgot to remove the taint option from the qmail-scanner-queue.pl file. Edit the file, and remove the -T option in the first line. BW Francisco Perez wrote: Hello: Maybe you've seen this problem before, I'm having problems ruinning Qmail-scanner on suse 9.1, althought I've c

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with C wrapper

Hello:   Maybe  you've seen this problem before, I'm having problems ruinning Qmail-scanner on suse 9.1, althought  I've chowned qscand.qscand and suid'ed the C wrapper, when qmail-scanner makes the /var/spool/qmailscanner/tmp/{dymanic-directory} It writtes with root.root permissionns, and most

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with ripeme

Hi, I installes qmail on my gentoo-2004.1-server with the emerge-files. so I have installes qmail-1.0.3 and qmail-scanner 1.20 I am fetching my mails from different pop3-servers and scan them locally for virusses and spams with clamav and spamassassin. One big mail did not received me, and I cann

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning **** Resolved ****

At 09:00 19/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: Hi Mark This is really strange, so I have some questions: How are you starting up qmail, and how do you call qmail-scanner? Does qmail-scanner-queue.pl looks like this: -rwsr-xr-x1 qscand qscand 95007 Feb 10 18:21 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-s

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

At 19:53 + 18-02-2004, Mark Pratt wrote: At 08:42 18/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 2:39 + 18-02-2004, Mark Pratt wrote: At 08:11 16/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 12:23 +1300 16-02-2004, Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:40:53PM +, Mark Pratt wrote: When I run s

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

%% From: Mark Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> %% To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] %% Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning %% %% At 08:42 18/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: %% >At 2:39 + 18-02-2004, Mark Pratt wrote: %% >>At 08:11 16/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote:

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

At 08:42 18/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 2:39 + 18-02-2004, Mark Pratt wrote: At 08:11 16/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 12:23 +1300 16-02-2004, Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:40:53PM +, Mark Pratt wrote: When I run sophie (and ClamAV) as the user qscand, I rece

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

At 2:39 + 18-02-2004, Mark Pratt wrote: At 08:11 16/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 12:23 +1300 16-02-2004, Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:40:53PM +, Mark Pratt wrote: When I run sophie (and ClamAV) as the user qscand, I receive the message as shown below. If I run Sop

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

At 08:11 16/02/2004, Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 12:23 +1300 16-02-2004, Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:40:53PM +, Mark Pratt wrote: When I run sophie (and ClamAV) as the user qscand, I receive the message as shown below. If I run Sophie as root, the processing completes as nor

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems w/ ClamAV .66 + .67

What exactly kind of error ? For permission problem I setting up /var/spool/qmailscan to 777 also. Could you try to running clamd as root ? Br, Fabrizio On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:29:29 -0800 (PST) Justyn Kemple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone had any problems getting emails to be scanned

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems w/ ClamAV .66 + .67

Has anyone had any problems getting emails to be scanned using CAV .66 or .67 with qmail scanner?   I get unable to access file errors...I think its something to do with premissions but yet I have /var/spool/qmailscan set to 777     Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

At 12:23 +1300 16-02-2004, Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:40:53PM +, Mark Pratt wrote: When I run sophie (and ClamAV) as the user qscand, I receive the message as shown below. If I run Sophie as root, the processing completes as normal and the message is delivered. What appears

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

Sunday 15 February 2004 23.40 skrev Mark Pratt: > Hello all. > > Just to add a little more weirdness as reported earlier by Awie (Problem > using ClamAV 0.66). I have not continued the message thread as the root > problem does not appear to the same. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/m

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:40:53PM +, Mark Pratt wrote: > When I run sophie (and ClamAV) as the user qscand, I receive the message as > shown below. If I run Sophie as root, the processing completes as normal > and the message is delivered. What appears to be happening is that the > message

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with AV scanning

Hello all. Just to add a little more weirdness as reported earlier by Awie (Problem using ClamAV 0.66). I have not continued the message thread as the root problem does not appear to the same. When I run sophie (and ClamAV) as the user qscand, I receive the message as shown below. If I run Sop

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems posting certain messages to the list?

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 66.35.250.206 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 550-This message matches a blacklisted regular expression ([Vv] *[Ii] *[Aa] 550 *[Gg] *[Rr] *[Aa]) I got this when trying to reply to the post: [Qmail-scanner-general]David Raistrick's "spambox" patch for qmail-s

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with Qmail-scanner on FreeBSD?

> > After messing arround with qmail-scanner, the patch upgrade and trying > to configure it all - im now turning to you. > > Im using FreeBSD 5.1 and have installed qmail, spamassassing and misc > perl modules. Currently im patching the qmail-1.03 with patch 19 > (downloaded in tar.gz file, from >

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with Qmail-scanner on FreeBSD?

Hi all, After messing arround with qmail-scanner, the patch upgrade and trying to configure it all - im now turning to you. Im using FreeBSD 5.1 and have installed qmail, spamassassing and misc perl modules. Currently im patching the qmail-1.03 with patch 19 (downloaded in tar.gz file, from

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems to detect and extract attachments

Hi! I'm having problems with qmail-scanner to detect messages attachments. Take a look at the header and Content-type: <...> Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?c2ls6m5jaW8h?= Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:35:12 + Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_58eb_1c9c_af

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with smtp ?

Hi! I've followed the guide at ... to get the Clam Antivirus daemon running under daemontools... I then configure qmail-scanner to use clamuko ... fine, things seems to be working... But during the last 24Hours after my change (and upgrade to 1.20), I have some of these entries in my smtp-log: @

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA

Thanks got it. for some reason (long day) I was looking in he spamassassin dir. doh! -Original Message- From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:34 PM To: Jennifer Fountain; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA

> -Original Message- > From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:15 PM > To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA > > > I just confirmed. Although, I did

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA

when I applied this to the end, I get this error on line 2002 which is this line: open(SOUT,">$scandir/$wmaildir/new/$file_id.spamc")||&tempfail("cannot open for write $scandir/$wmaildir/new/$file_id.spamc - $!"); could this be an old version. spamassassin is starting

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA

> -Original Message- > From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:41 PM > To: Dallas L. Engelken > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA > > > this is the only thing in my scanner_array: > > my @sc

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA

> -Original Message- > From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA > > --scanners "clamscan,verbose_spamassassin" > >

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA

I don't think SA is working correctly. According to my logs: maillog: Aug 26 14:40:14 chopin spamd[580]: server started on port 783 (running version 2.55) [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmailscan]# tail qmail-queue.log Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:24:03 -0400:24929: w_c: primary Content-Type of text/plain found Wed

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with exitcodes?

Hi! I'm trying to get RAV to work with qmail-scanner and I've bashed my head to the wall for some times now... I could need some help :-) The perl-scanner itself works fine, and I could send mail to and from the server. When the scanner then invokes RAV, it checks for the exit code to decide wheth

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with perl!! ugh!

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:20 PM >Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with perl!! ugh! > > >> Hi All, >> I'm setting up a new email server for the company, and webhosting clients >with virus scan

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with perl!! ugh!

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:20 PM Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with perl!! ugh! > Hi All, > I'm setting up a new email server for the company, and webhosting clients with virus scanning and > anti-spam s

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with perl!! ugh!

OK, I commented out line 82 in qmail-scanner-queue.pl like you said and ran it again and now I get: setuidgid qmaild /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g Global symbol "$V_HEADER" requires explicit package name at /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl line 84. BEGIN not safe after errors--

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with perl!! ugh!

Hi All, I'm setting up a new email server for the company, and webhosting clients with virus scanning and anti-spam support; however, I'm having one heck of a time trying to get qmail-scanner working correctly. I had it working correctly for a while, but I had to upgrade perl to get Spa

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with qmail-scanner-1.15 on Solaris 9

Hi, Can anybody help me fixing the below problem? 07/02/2003 18:09:47:24496: +++ starting debugging for process 24496 by uid=1001 at 07/02/2003 18:09:47 07/02/2003 18:09:47:24496: setting UID to EUID so subprocesses can access files generated by this script 07/02/2003 18:09:47:24496: program name

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with ripmime.

Hi guys, I've got a problem with ripmime and qmail-scanner 1.15. Sometimes I receive some emails with viruses, but once a week or so. Other emails with virus are not bypassing the scanner. There is no relation between the type of virus and if they can or cannot bypass the scanner. I use F-P

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems calling SpamAssassin from qmail-scanner under Redhat 8.0

This problem seems to have been posted quite a few times in the last few days. I'm running Qmail-scanner 1.1.5 scanning with ClamAV-054 and Spamassassin-2.43, on Redhat 8.0 (thusly with Perl 5.8.) The same setup works perfectly on a system running perl 5.6.1. Through my megar knowledge of pe

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with spamd and qmail-scanner

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:31:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unless you tell me otherwise, I'll assume you don't mind me sharing this > with the SA list? They came up empty on this. Yeah - it's been fixed for a couple of weeks in 1.16 - but I haven't released it yet. ...and now it's this

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with spamd and qmail-scanner

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Hine,Chris wrote: > I have attached the patch that I use that specifically checks for score > and threshold = 0. This should only cause a problem if you have set your > threshold to 0. > The relevant line is below. > - if ($sa_max > $sa_score) { > + if (($sa_max > $s

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with spamd and qmail-scanner

If I understand you correctly, will this also fix it so email gets delivered if spamd is down? That's the way it's supposed to behave according to the docs for spamc and what I can glean from the QS code, but when spamd is down, ALL email is marked as 0/0 and rejected. Thanks! On Tue, 17 Dec 20

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with spamd and qmail-scanner

Basically, as of QS 1.15 (I think) Jason decided he wasn't going to trust the return value from spamassassin, as there have been a number of versions that don't work properly, so QS checks the values and marks the mail as spam itself. Unfortunately the test that is used is score >= threshold, whic

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with spamd and qmail-scanner

Found that out too with SA 2.20 which is shipped with Debian woody. It seems to be caused by too large mails, which aren't scanned by SA so it gets 0/0 as score. I haven't found out what to do about this, but in my mail program (Ximian Evolution 1.20) I filter on: Header X-Spam-Status contains "Ye

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with spamd and qmail-scanner

I have a new server up with qmail-scanner, spamassassin 2.4.3 (spamd for system-wide use) and maildrop. It works fine most of the time, but when certain attachments arrive (NOT ones listed in quarantine.txt), the email is rejected as spam because the threshold and hits are reset to 0 like this:

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with Reformime

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:41:58PM -0700, Tren Blackburn wrote: > I did a bit more hunting and found that some of the messages, the > filename is: > > goldfish.doc > .pif > > or .bat, or whatever. I didn't count exactly how many spaces, but this > seems to be the case for the messages getting th

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with Reformime

ECTED] [mailto:qmail-scanner-general-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Tren Blackburn Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with Reformime Hi List; I have noticed that I've had a couple instances of the Lentin.F vir

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with Reformime

Hi List; I have noticed that I've had a couple instances of the Lentin.F virus getting through qmail-scanner/fsav. I did some digging through the log files and found that it seems like reformime isn't properly putting the attachment back together. The filename ends up .pif or .bat and never gets

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with qmail-scanner 1.15

torsdagen den 31 oktober 2002 22.36 skrev John Johnson: > ok how do I fix the problem with line 82 in the > quarantine-attachments.txt > I don't see the problem but it is telling me there is one. The different fields should be separated by a tab, look at the other lines to see how it should be.

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with qmail-scanner 1.15

ok how do I fix the problem with line 82 in the quarantine-attachments.txt I don't see the problem but it is telling me there is one. -John _ John Johnson SysAdmin ICQ#: 24823932 More ways to contact me: http://wwp.icq.com/24823932 __

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems updating to sophos sweep 3.62

>Increase your softlimits. > >-- >Ed. > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On >> Behalf Of Salvatore Toribio >> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:06 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >&

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems updating to sophos sweep 3.62

Increase your softlimits. -- Ed. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Salvatore Toribio > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems updating

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems updating to sophos sweep 3.62

Hi, I'm running qmali-scanner 1.14 in a RedHat 7.1 with Sophos Sweep. Everythins was working ok until i've updated Sophos Sweep from version 3.60 to 3.62 I got this error /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log . 15/10/2002 12:45:24:19285: tempfail: X-Anti-Virus-PUSC-1.14: corrupt or unkno

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems.

Hi all,     i tried to install qmail-scanner-1.14 with Inoculan antivirus, it doesn´t work, i tried vscan from TrendMicro, and it doesn´t work again, please is there anybody who has installed qmail-scanner with one of this antivirus?, please could you tell me how did you do?, please could y

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

s you need to better explain (in detail) what you're actually attempting to do, because I seem to have missed the goal. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Doug Monroe > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:37 PM > To: [EMAI

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

ugust 30, 2002 8:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin Jeremy Olmen wrote: > > Only problem is that I'm not trying to do any local delivery, this is simply > a spam-and-virus filtering front e

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

Jeremy Olmen wrote: > > Only problem is that I'm not trying to do any local delivery, this is simply > a spam-and-virus filtering front end for the destination (sadly, exchange). > My job would be so much easier if I could've just used maildrop or procmail! > (although it appears maildrop only wo

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

h sendmail). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Monroe Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin Jeremy Olmen wrote: > > I

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

Doug Monroe wrote: [snip] > MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ > DEFAULT=$MAILDIR [snip] > ## WHAT TO DO > # options: -delete- or -hold- or -forward- spam > # to delete > /dev/null > # to hold: > #spam <-- SEE NOTE BELOW > # or... > # to forward: > # ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] I should men

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

Jeremy Olmen wrote: > > I am trying to use qmail-scanner in conjunction with spamassassin as well as > a small script to determine the score of the message, and if it's above my > defined threshold to send it to another mailbox. If the conditions are met > and the message is to be sent to another

[Qmail-scanner-general]problems with the to: field using qmail-scanner and spamassassin

I am trying to use qmail-scanner in conjunction with spamassassin as well as a small script to determine the score of the message, and if it's above my defined threshold to send it to another mailbox. If the conditions are met and the message is to be sent to another mailbox, all I'm doing is re-w

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems in DB

Hi everybody!!! I'd a little problem installing qmail-scanner.1.1 When I run configure with my options I get the following errors: perlscanner: generate new DB file ERROR: incorrect format on line 74 - skipped ERROR: incorrect format on line 75 - skipped ERROR: incorrect format on line 77 - skippe