> my qmail-smtpd/run
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 12000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l "$LOCAL" -x > /etc/qmail/tcp.smtp.cdb
-c "$MAXSM TPD" \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g
> "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd "$LOCAL" \
/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /usr/bin/true 2>&1
>
> Nicol
>
> > IMO, Your best best is a patch to qmail-remote.c that 'signs' the
> > domain key at that point as its leaving your system.
> >
> Maybe but I want to integrate it in qmail-scanner so I cannot
> patch qmail-remote, since qmail-local handles incoming and
> outgoing mails
>
Oh no..
Qmail
>
>The only problem that I can think of now, is how to
> determine if mail is delivered local, or it is delivered
> remote (to sign it or to check it), since --local-domains
> isn't good enough. I was thinking of some way to read the
> domains from rcpthosts and know which domains are loca
>
> >Hey guys..
> >
> >I was looking at this sub, and noticed it calls avpdaemon like
> >
> >`$avpdaemon_binary $ENV{'TMPDIR'} 2>&1`;
> >
> >However, if you've messed with aveclient/aveserver, you'll see that
> >this does not work.
> >
> ># /usr/local/kav/bin/aveclient -p /var/run/aveserver -s
Hey guys..
I was looking at this sub, and noticed it calls avpdaemon like
`$avpdaemon_binary $ENV{'TMPDIR'} 2>&1`;
However, if you've messed with aveclient/aveserver, you'll see that this
does not work.
# /usr/local/kav/bin/aveclient -p /var/run/aveserver -s /tmp
/tmp ERROR not a regular file
Just FYI...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ripmime-general-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dallas L. Engelken
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Ripmime-general] another ole unpack issue
>
>
FYI again.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Paul L Daniels
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Ripmime-general] ripMIME 1.3.2.0
>
>
> 1.3.2.0 has been released publically;
>
> http://w
FYI
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul L Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 9:28 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ripmime-general] RE: Yet another ripmime 1.3.1.2 error
>
>
> Dallas (and everyon
>
> >
> > Argh...
> >
> > d_m: output spotted from /usr/local/bin/ripmime
> > --disable-qmail-bounce --no-ole --recursion-max 30
> > --unique_names -i - -d
> > /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/localhost108800011278119877/
> > (mime.c:1032:MIME_is_file_mime:ERROR: cannot open file
> > '/var/qmail/qma
>
> Argh...
>
> d_m: output spotted from /usr/local/bin/ripmime
> --disable-qmail-bounce --no-ole --recursion-max 30
> --unique_names -i - -d
> /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/localhost108800011278119877/
> (mime.c:1032:MIME_is_file_mime:ERROR: cannot open file
> '/var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/localho
Argh...
d_m: output spotted from /usr/local/bin/ripmime --disable-qmail-bounce
--no-ole --recursion-max 30 --unique_names -i - -d
/var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/localhost108800011278119877/
(mime.c:1032:MIME_is_file_mime:ERROR: cannot open file
'/var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/localhost108800011278119877/tmp
>
> Anyone else seeing ripmime doing crazy things like this??
>
> [snip]
>
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> 8415 qmailq20 0 192 28 8 R26.3 0.0 223:21 ripmime
> 14350 qmailq17 0 196 24 8 R24.5 0.0 159:48 ripmime
> 18
Is anyone seeing messages in qmail-scanner that cause ripmime to exceed
20 parts and cause tempfail ?
output spotted from /usr/local/bin/ripmime --unique_names -i - -d
/var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/mailgw.nmgi.com108670228878018143/
(mime.c:2666:MIME_unpack_stage2:WARNING: Current recursion level of 2
> >
> > Just curious which smtp clients re-attach the original message and
> > send it back to the return-path?? Whoever does this should
> be shot!
> > I don't
>
> Err - Qmail for starters? Sendmail? Postfix? Exchange? All
> mail servers default to bouncing the ENTIRE message back to
> se
>
> Seriously, my current take on this is that the currrent
> system never sends viruses, and this "fix" will [effectively]
> cause Q-S to generate viruses
>
> Why does that scare me?
>
Just curious which smtp clients re-attach the original message and send
it back to the return-path?? Whoev
>
> I gather that you would like to completely replace the
> psender functionality (or create another option that is
> mutually exclusive to psender) with the ability to return a
> 550 and a customer error message.
>
Well, not completely replace it, but there is literally no difference
between
> >
> > If this was a real user, sending a virus-infected file, then both
> > methods would cause the user to be notified.
>
> Not if you're using psender functionality. That is the whole
> basis for this discussion. The addition of psender
> functionality, IMO, makes in necessary to return a
>
> What we *should* do is include a qmail patch to allow q-s to
> return "550 message rejected because it contains a virus"
> when it detects a virus.
> Then if the virus is using its own SMTP engine (most do) it
> will be unable to send mails to our servers. No bounces are
> generated; vir
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:08:04AM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > Nobody will bitch at you for handing a 550 to a virus infected
> > email... I guarantee it!
>
> But no-one has explained why it is better than the current system!
>
First of all, this is
> >
>
> Sending a 5xx error only makes sense if a message is
> quarantined due to policy reasons (by perl_scanner) since
> that is usually where you have false positives. Otherwise
> 99.9% of messages that have detectable viruses have fake
> senders and therefore it would be meaningless to s
>
> 1. I am an infected Windows PC. I use SMTP to send the virus to my
> default SMTP gateway, it rejects the message (due to virus)
> at the SMTP
> layer. The virus doesn't report that SMTP error to the end user - so
> they are unaware they are infected.
>
How many viruses send mail via the
> >
> > if ($REJECT_VIRUS && $quarantine_event && $destring =~
> m/^virus/) {
> >&error_condition("Virus detected, send SMTP error
> code...",33);
> > }
> >
> > if ($REJECT_SPAM && $spam_event) {
> >&error_condition("Spam detected, send SMTP error
> code...",32);
>
> As you surely know, a 5xx is sent back to the return-path, and it is
> almost always faked...
>
True, but you are issuing a 550 to the sending server, which in turn is
responsible for delivery of the MAILER-DAEMON to the return-path. Your
server is not sending the non-deliverable, therefor
>
> In order to get error codes that mean something, instead of
> '451 qq temp
> fail', you'll need to recompile qmail/netqmail.
>
And since we are talking about permanent failures, that should have said
"551 mail server permanently rejected message" where exit code is 31.
-
Patch:
-
http://www.engelken.net/download/policyonzip.patch
Description:
-
This patch allows you to configure whether or not perlscan_scanner has
access to filenames that are inside of zip files. Currently, with
$force_unzip=1, files are unzipped and the
>
> So why don't we change qmail-scanner to return
> a 5xx SMTP error code and a short message when a
> virus email is quarantined?
>
> That way, a legitimate sender will instantly
> know that there is a problem with his email,
> instead of believing that the email was delivered
> successfully. I
>
> Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
>
> > As you can see, reformime is the problem. I may be switching to
> > ripmime
> > :)
>
> I already have switched, and I think that scanning of all messages,
> including text, should be on by default.
>
If you read
>
> scanloop: scanner=spamassassin,plain_text_msg=0
>
> Any one could explain what that means ?
>
It means 'sub scanloop' its calling the 'sub spamassassin' and
$plain_text_msg is set to 0, either because you have the default set to
off, or because the particular message it is scanning had MIM
Is there any way &grab_envelope_hdrs; can be called before &working_copy
so one could add X-Envelope-From:/To: headers to the tmp/TMPFILE before
moving to new/
This would allow spamassassin whitelists and blacklists actually work
against the envelope as well as the normal email headers since SA c
>
> Here is the proof that QS bypasses Virus Scans on it
>
> Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:14:43 -0500:17737: from=Kathy Scott
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,subj=FW: Mom & Russell,
> x-qmail-scanner-message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> nmgi.com> via local process 17737 Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:14:43
> -0500:17737: Th
>
> Just tested ripmime and it sees it..
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# ripmime -v -imsg1
> Decoding filename=textfile0_1
> Decoding filename=Dad, Lavena, Alta.jpg
> Decoding filename=textfile1_1
> Decoding filename=Dad, Lavena, Alta.jpg
>
> reformime does not.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# reform
>
>
> No I don't call it a vulnerability. The skip_text_msgs
> feature, intended to skip messages that just seem to be plain
> text, improves performance by not scanning messages that
> don't appear to have binary content. Admittedly, yes, its
> not perfect. Not being a user of QSQ 1.2x, I
>
> It doesnt need to be addressed at all. It isnt a bug or a
> problem with QS. If you are so worried about it, set
> $skip_text_msgs = 0 and call it a day. This isnt anything
> new. The only argument i see here is that MAYBE this should
> be 0 by default.
>
Call it what you will... I jus
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 2:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]g_e_h: no sender and no recips
>
>
> Hello friends,
>
> I am using RH8.0 Linux,
>
> I wouldn't necessarily call this a vulnerability. I ran into
> this when writting the Regex Scanner for QSQ. Find
> $skip_text_msgs and set it to 0 so that all e-mails,
> including plain text, are scanned.
>
> This only applies to the 1.2x versions, 1.1x don't have this feature.
>
You d
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU
COMMAND
> 3706 spamd1290 420M 300M RUN 12:01 85.21% 85.21% perl
Softlimit your call to spamd... That way it cant use 420M of physical
mem. However, it should never use that much.. Are your bayes databases
large, o
I was looking through the code on 1.21 and saw that virus scans are
disabled on plain text messages... This can be a problem when a plain
text message with an old style Uuencoded attachment is in-lined into a
message using begin and end statements... Take the following email for
example... (note
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]hostname call
>
>
> Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
>
>
> > you call open(
>
> Jason Haar wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:44:08AM -0600, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> >
> >># HOSTNAME GRABBED DYNAMICALLY open(ME,"/var/qmail/control/me");
> >>flock(ME,2);
> >>my $temphost=;
> >>close(ME);
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 2:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]hostname call
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:44:08AM -0600, Dallas L. Engelken wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 5:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]hostname call
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:49:49AM +, Mark Powell wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is there any reason tha
> Hi :)
>
> Anyone knows how I can easly view the msgs inside this folder
> after QS scans them?
>
> Shai
>
Symlink it to your maildir and view it via IMAP Something like...
ln -s /var/qmail/qmailscan/quarantine
/var/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/myuser/Maildir/.Quarantine
And then subsc
>
> if ($sa_status == 0) {
> if ($sa_max == 0) {
> $tag_score .= "SA:?($sa_score/$sa_max):";
> } else {
> $tag_score .= "SA:0($sa_score/$sa_max):";
> $sa_comment = "No, hits=$sa_score required=$sa_max" if
> ($spamc_options =~ /\-c/);
> }
> } else {
> $tag_sco
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]incoming concurrency
>
>
>
> Hi:
>
> We have our incomingconcurrency set to 30. We have 1GB of
> ram. Does anyone
> kno
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Clamscan -- any thoughts?
>
>
> I'm using clam-av with qmail-scanner. Is anyone else STILL
> haven't problems blocking the "
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:11 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]redundant scanning and unzip
>
>
> i thought --secure calle
>
> so i should probably turn off --unzip then in uvscan since i
> have to leave it on in Q-S to get perlscanner to read inside
> and outside the zip and then turn redundant_scanning on.
> That seems most optimal CPU wise for needing to catch
> attachments and viruses both inside and outside
>
> I have redundant scanning off in my 1.16 qmail-scanner and
> uvscan setup b/c i use --unzip with uvscan. I would like to
> turn off force_unzip, but i need perlscanner to block
> attachments outside and inside the zip.
> is it possible for perlscanner to block outside and inside
> the z
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcio R A Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]No quarantine
>
>
>
>
> Anything like this:
>
> cd /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine
> rm -rf new
> ln -s /dev/
> so i have 150 incoming concurrency, and 60 spamd children...
> grepping my
> maillog, i see 20 of 20 children reached on each server only a couple
> times a day.
>
correction, 150 incoming, 40 spamd children as i have 3 mta's 50x3 and 2
spamd boxes 20x2.
dallas
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Fulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S + SA performance survey.
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know what kind of performance (particularly in concurrent
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Eagles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:22 AM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Fwd: Uvscan on 1.20rc3
> using --redundant
>
>
> Do you know why they aren'
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Eagles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Fwd: Uvscan on 1.20rc3 using
> --redundant
>
>
> When using qmail-scanner-1.20rc3 if the --redundant switch is
> set
> How does qmail-scanner actually send the notification though?
> Does it just use the sendmail command?
>
my $qmailinject = '/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject';
open(SM,"|$qmailinject -h -f ''")||&tempfail("cannot open $qmailinject
for sending quarantine report - $!");
> If that's the case, the
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Guardiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]SoBig.F silent
>
>
> Howdy list,
>
> I have "sobig" in my list of --silent-viruses.
> And I am (appropriately)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 8:02 AM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Using Bayes/Spamassassin
> with Qmailscanner
>
>
> > edit
-Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Using Bayes/Spamassassin with
> Qmailscanner
>
>
> I am trying to implement bayes filtering with
> qmailscanner/spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Kazuhiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]version string of F-Prot Antivirus
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I recently downloaded 'F-Prot Antivirus for Linux
> Workstations - for h
> -Original Message-
> From: Arno Slatius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]F-prot daemon scanner
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the qmail scanner with f-prot. The full version of
> f-prot comes with a d
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dallas L. Engelken
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]question about mysql sa with qs
>
> Aug 28 14:59:02 fbsd sp
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Lyszczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]question about mysql sa with qs
>
>
> > my $spamc_options=' -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] -f';
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Nicholas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:09 AM
> To: Qmail-scanner
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Cleaning quarantine?
>
>
> So can I just delete messages in quarantine? Are these
> messages also still somewhere in the
> I had a bit of a problem with McAfee. It does not run on RH9
> unless you do a trick: LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc.so.6 uvscan This
> preloads the correct library. I set up an alias (in
> /etc/profile.d/color*) which created and alias for uvscan
> (uvscan='LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc.so.6 uvscan')
>
insta
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:15 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA
>
>
> I just confirmed. Although, I did
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Lomonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]performance issue
>
>
> Like so many others, with the recent flood of SoBig spam
> coming through our server, I decide
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA
>
>
> this is the only thing in my scanner_array:
>
> my @sc
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]problems with SA
>
> --scanners "clamscan,verbose_spamassassin"
>
>
see what @scanners has in it... jsut becau
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spam Assassin Scripts
>
>
>
> Here are the scripts I am using. Right now, the QMAILQUEUE
> env variable is set to q
>
> Anyway, I wonder whether a "sort-of" domain setup is possible
> with qmail-scanner and SpamAssassin ? What I want to achieve,
> is that all mail for a specific domain uses its own bayesian
> database - and maybe own customized filters. The problem is,
> that the domain is not hosted locall
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spam Assassin Scripts
>
>
> Just wondering if anyone had any ideas as to how to add my
> own spamassassin scripts to qma
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Ipsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 10:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Suggestion: Option to archive
> all messages tagged by SpamAssassin
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I miss an option, where it is possib
> -Original Message-
> From: CertaintyTech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:25 AM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; 'ML qmail-scanner'
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Worm.Sobig.F
>
>
> Shouldn't the last entry in the acce
> -Original Message-
> From: CertaintyTech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:04 PM
> To: 'ML qmail-scanner'
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Worm.Sobig.F
>
>
> > option 1) restrict all outbound destination port 25 traffic
> from your
> > internal lan, ex
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:34 AM
> To: Matt
> Cc: ML qmail-scanner
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Worm.Sobig.F
>
>
> Matt wrote:
> > How can I prevent the sobig worm from going out to people?
>
> Get it off
> So far today we have trapped over 400 infected emails with
> the Sobig.F attachment.
>
check out the attached image 18% of the mail today is sobig.f.
<>
this patch will prevent multiple X-Spam-Status: occurencys from
overriding your $sa_score and $sa_max values. for some people who use
the sql logging additions, this is important, otherwise it records
incorrect values. for everyone else, it's not overly important,
because the only place you will
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]uvscan confusion with
> --unzip and --mime
>
>
> so am i gaining anything by turning on either force_unzip or
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]uvscan confusion with --unzip
> and --mime
>
>
> Also i understand that since Q-S calls uvscan with --secure
> that t
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Kendzorra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Environment variables
>
>
> > > $spamc_options="-f -u" and later
> > > &debug("SA: run $spamc_binary $spamc_options $re
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Kendzorra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 4:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Environment variables
>
>
> Hi Dallas,
> i tried your solution, but for me it didn't work because the
> .qmail-file
>
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Kendzorra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Environment variables
>
>
> Hello list,
> I searched the archive for that, but didn't find anything:
> I'd like to use SpamA
> -Original Message-
> From: John Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]test
>
>
> It works So do you know how SF managed this trick with
> there mail servers?
>
> -John
>
when i send
> I'm afraid the perlscanner file checks happen first for a
> reason - they're cheap :-) Any virus/whatever you can block
> earlier means less work for your system.
>
is it possible to change the calls to perlscan_scanner() and scanloop()
around in the init_scanners() function? or will take br
testing.. looks like sourceforge implemented rfc822 checks at the smtp
level to verify the remote party accepts mail for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
just want to see if this goes through..
d
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Dev
> -Original Message-
> From: D.Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]magic-smtpd?
>
>
> I'm curious to know if anyone on this list has made use of
> magic-smtpd:
>http://www.linuxmagic.com/o
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kusnetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:01 PM
>
> Actually I'm now looking at the uvscan docs, it seems by
> adding --mime and --mailbox to uvscan it should handle the
> unpacked email by itself. Maybe these should be added
> Actually I'm now looking at the uvscan docs, it seems by
> adding --mime and --mailbox to uvscan it should handle the
> unpacked email by itself. Maybe these should be added to
> qmail-scanner itself? Also qmail-scanner sets the --secure
> option, which activates --unzip, so should --unzip
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kusnetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:01 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Trying to daemonize
> uvscan through spamd
>
> Actually I'm now l
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kusnetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:29 PM
>
> I've been running with virus scanning through uvscan and spam
> scanning with spamassassin with no problems.
>
> I would now like to move to where both virus and spam
> scann
89 matches
Mail list logo
