> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Kendzorra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Environment variables
> 
> 
> > > $spamc_options="-f -u" and later
> > > &debug("SA: run $spamc_binary $spamc_options $recips <
> > > $scandir/$wmaildir/new/$file_id")
> > > and
> > > open(SA,"$spamc_binary $spamc_options $recips <
> > > $scandir/$wmaildir/new/$file_id|") (...)
> > > And it seems to work for me, even cc-user's user_prefs 
> are used. Do 
> > > you see any problem with this configuration?
> >
> > there is nothing different from putting -u in the spamc_options or 
> > putting in the spamassassin sub, but if you think it works that way 
> > and not the other... stick with what you are doing.
> 
> I think you got me wrong - I didn't mean putting -u 
> elsewhere, but using 
> $recips after $spamc_options in the spamassassin sub.
> For me this worked as I wanted (to and cc-recipients are processed), 
> even if it may not be the most elegant solution.
> Just wanted to know if anyone sees a problem with this 
> solution. Juergen
> 

did you not see my original email?  notice the -u $recips in the
spamassassin sub in the else statement.  that keeps multi-recips from
processing -u '[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]' which would not pull
proper prefs.

 open(SA,"$spamc_binary $spamc_options -u '$recips' 

d


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to