> > > > If this was a real user, sending a virus-infected file, then both > > methods would cause the user to be notified. > > Not if you're using psender functionality. That is the whole > basis for this discussion. The addition of psender > functionality, IMO, makes in necessary to return a 550. > >
Agreed, the use of perlscan_scanner is not just policy driven... If you set a new policy to stop a newly released virus that have no definitions yet, you really don't want to psender them, because you'll generate bogus alerts. Dallas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id%62&alloc_ida84&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
