> > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:08:04AM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > > Nobody will bitch at you for handing a 550 to a virus infected > > email... I guarantee it! > > But no-one has explained why it is better than the current system! >
First of all, this is not a debate... Jesse was making a proposal, which if support is added, it could still be optional, not the default setting, and something you have to 'turn on' to use.... Some people like the way it works currently... Some might not. Personally, I 550 for the simple fact that its less overhead than forking a call to qmail-queue to inject (a|several) custom crafted notification message. Does that make it better? Maybe.. Maybe not. It depends what you are comparing I guess! Loosen up man... (is this list is slow at posting replies or is it just me?). ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
