2.0.
Thanks in advance.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP DH/DSS Key Fingerprint [Send email for public key.]
046A FAE0 1E45 FC3E 0560 BAA5 3BA7 9671 5D87 2BAA
re. Nevertheless the results are just great.
Read mail from ~/var/spool/mail are transfered to ~/Mail/mbox by default. Is there a
way for them to be transfered to their respective mailboxes based on their headers
(like a filter or something)? Can a macro do this too?
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMA
Hi,
I've got a -quit file in ~/.mutt directory. Can anyone tell me what this
file is for?
size - 37054 bytes
ownership - me:me
permission- 664
Just curious. :-)
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP DH/DSS Key Fingerprint [Send email for public key.]
046A FAE0 1E45 FC3E
this command as suggested by man man page but doesn't work.
man procmail | col -b > procmail.txt
Any ideas? Thanks.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP DH/DSS Key Fingerprint [Send email for public key.]
046A FAE0 1E45 FC3E 0560 BAA5 3BA7 9671 5D87 2BAA
Thanks for the tip.
-quit contained a vim buffer of a file that I was toying with earlier - the vim
editing.txt.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 01:08:47AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> On 2001.03.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL
Hi Everyone,
I'm sorry if I seem to be asking all the basic questions. I'm really new at
this. I recv mail in text/html and prev 'v' to view it. How do I use the '|'
pipe command from 'v' to view the text/html in lynx?
Thanks.
--
Horace G. Fri
de all headers for my reply. I had to get out of this msg
to take a look at the above Received hdr?
Thanks all.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP DH/DSS Key Fingerprint [Send email for public key.]
046A FAE0 1E45 FC3E 0560 BAA5 3BA7 9671 5D87 2BAA
:56PM +1100, David wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I'm sorry if I seem to be asking all the basic questions. I'm really new at
> > this. I recv mail in text/html and prev 'v' to view it. How do I use the '|
ing into another editor such as in here?
Horace
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:13:02AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:50:23PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I
r so it is rumoured hereabouts,
> Horace G. Friend III thought:
> > Hi Rich,
> >
> > Here's the output from man procmail | col -b > procmail.txt
> >
> > sh: -c: line 2: syntax error: unexpected end of line
> > Error executing formatting or display command.
&g
I found the error. It's the application that I've set to view URLS.
The .urlview in my home directory contains
COMMAND links %s &
I removed the & which fixed the problem. I tried it with "lynx %s &"
which works just fine.
Thanks guys.
Horace
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:42:45AM +, Barry Mit
o continue...
message and the message doesn't get sent.
What's signal 11? Which manual should I look into -- pgp or mutt?
Dazed and confused... :)
Horace
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP DH/DSS Key Fingerprint [Send email for public key.]
046A FAE0 1E45 FC3E 0560 BAA5 3BA7 9671 5D87 2BAA
efore I set ~/.procmailrc everything seems
fine. Could the error be cause by ~/.procmailrc?
Thanks for the help.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP DH/DSS Key Fingerprint [Send email for public key.]
046A FAE0 1E45 FC3E 0560 BAA5 3BA7 9671 5D87 2BAA
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:28:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:32PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
> >
> > I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify
> > signed msgs after I get their public keys outsi
Hi Lars,
Yup it was me alright. :)
I tried to take up your offer of scanning that AHAOFIAH.EXE file
that I suspected of having a virus. I encrypted and signed the
binary and tried to send it to your email address as an
attachment.
What baffles me is that I can send to this list. I've set sendma
my paragraph while composing mail...
Moving on... and thanks.
Cheers,
Horace
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
PGP signature
above touches on procmail, fetchmail aside from mutt.
It will benefit you to read the Mail-Administrator-HOWTO, in addition
to the Mutt Manual, which explains how a mailing system in Linux
works. It can be found at http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
default signing key
in my muttrc set to DSS/ElGamal.
Can't think of what's wrong with your GnuPG unless something's wrong
with the muttrc config file.
Have you tried running GnuPG outside of Mutt?
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295
Hi Dave,
I've seen the article about the PGP flaw. :(
Question is, where does that leave PGP/GPG users and the security
issues involved?
Cheers.
Horace
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:40:29PM -0700, Dave Murray wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III wrote on mutt-users:
> > I've got
n the editor. Since the "-c ':$;?^$'" is a search command
for a blank line, it leaves blank lines highlighted as a result of the
search. How can I make this disappear automatically?
Thanks.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
signing a file on your local system
and then verifiying it?
If the result is okay then somehow your signed email msg is being
altered by your mailing system (due to a config) or whatever.
Otherwise you might check your GPG config.
Good luck. Cheers.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:40:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> "Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I would like to ask a question since the search command has a
> > side-effect in the editor. Since the "-c ':$;
e and leave the colored text as is. Or how can I set Vi
to display white text on black bg?
The manual says that I can set bg = dark or light. But this doesn't help
any ... unless I'm missing something. :)
Thanks.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Finger
> > > after setting bg in vim command mode. Or put 'set bg=dark' into
> > > your .vimrc file.
> >
> > So how's that done then?
>
> :syn on
>
> Best regards - Juergen
Hi,
Thanks much for the tips. It works. I added the syn on com
ssage:
sh: -c line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `'
sh: -c line 1: `'
I placed the perl script in /usr/local/bin and set it to world
read/execute mode. (chmod 755)
I also changed the first line #!/usr/local/bin/perl to #!/usr/bin/perl
where my perl binary is located.
Any fix for
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using -f
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:52 +0800
From: "Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [kde-user] Your list request...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: "Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAI
leave it as is... but
am I correct in my assumption?
Thanks in advance.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:52:07PM +0100, Brian Foley wrote:
> * Horace G. Friend III [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [01-04-01] wrote:
> > I tried the perl script but I'm getting an error when trying the execute
> > the macro. The error message:
> >
> > sh: -c line 1: sy
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:58:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > The original message was received at Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:50:52 +0800
> > >from hgf3@localhost
> >- The following addresses
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:14:08AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Now I get it. And I thought this was a mutt or mail system config
> > problem. This thing also happened to me at the redhat-install-list.
>
ble,
> but the location of the user mail files that it
> uses is system dependent (e.g., /var/mail/$USER).
>
If I may butt-in folks :), I tried setting the MAILPATH in
~/.bash_profile as in
MAILPATH='/var/mail/hgf3:~/Mail/IN.mutt-users?"You have mu
ed 3 settings: MASQUERADE_AS, masquerade_envelope and SMART_HOST.
It worked. It wasn't that difficult to configure sendmail after all.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 12:48:13PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > I compared it with my sendmail.mc and found 7 differents settings. I
> > only used 3 settings: MASQUERADE_AS, masquerade_envelope and SMART
Hi,
Sendmail is adding the X-Authentication warning. How do I keep sendmail
from doing that?
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: hgf3 set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using -f
Thanks.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B
Guys,
Thanks for the help. I learned a lot.
Cheers.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
t; I hope that would help someone :)
>
> igor
Hi Igor,
Thanks for this "un-expected" tip. I posted a query about RunningX on
another list but got no definitive answer.
An application kept on asking for RunningX which unfortunately was not
on my system and I had no idea what
> / message. I pressed 'm' to mail, pressed 'y' to resume, saw my
> / postponed message in the postponed list, and selected it. The
> / message view came up with the expected headers recipient, but the
> / body was empty. I subsequently re-postponed the message, so any
ng.gpg
> set pgp_list_pubring_command=~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
>
Take a look at Mutt's gpg.rc. In fact, Mutt's default Muttrc contains
these already.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
f keyid of usual@address is 0x457632
pgp-hook other@address 0x457632
all encrypted msgs addressed to other@address will be encrypted using
keyid 0x457632.
Of course, other@address must be among usual@address' pgp/gpg public
key.
HTH. Cheers.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
ey already defaults to
#next-line, otherwise set it
bind pager \, previous-line #this works for < key
bind pager \. next-line #this works for > key
bind pager 0 delete-message #do everything with a single hand
bind index 0 delete-message #default "q
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 10:18:30PM -0700, CB wrote:
> Well now that I'm armed with a little bit of help, gpg should be a bit
> easier to get working (going to first key party next weekend).
Don't forget to upload/post your public key to a keyserver after you're
set.
(for example):
keyserver certserver.pgp.com
You can overide this using gpg --keyserver www.keys.us.pgp.net
At times, new users of GnuPG/PGP do not upload their public keys and as
such you will always get a "no key" error or something... :(
HTH. Cheers.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
ve earlier tried using different RunningX shell scripts that I got
from this list but none seem to work except the one above. Oh well
I got the above script by doing a www.google.com search.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D
mailcap entry so
that the mime msg will open in an existing netscape window or
1. open a new netscape window if none exist? or
2. open it in links (my next mailcap entry) even if test=RunningX prove
positive (exit 0)?
Is this possible? I think so since nothing is "almost" impossible
ried exactly that, but I have something similar in a script
> (mutt_netscape) that you can find at my mutt web page.
>
Hi Gary,
Thanks. The mailcap entry you suggested works.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:34:48PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 10:48:14AM +0800, Horace G. Friend III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also d/led the RunningX.c code from mutt.org and compiled it as
> > suggested in the code but I get a compile error.
r Mutt's
default? If it is the latter, how can we change this behavior?
Thanks in advance.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
ithout opening another console or getting out of the mutt session. If
anyone has a better suggestion, I'm all ears... :)
Cheers.
--
Horace G. Friend III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG DSA/ElGamal Key Fingerprint
9295 80C4 C723 621B 9C2D B53E D432 7936 4CA9 8AD6
026U510) with SMTP id AAO197;
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:00:43 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reduce Your Debt! [oracs]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
St
Thanks for clarifying a lot of things.
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 02:35:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
>
> > Since April 27, I noticed that ALL my mails pass through outblaze.com, a
> > Hong Kong based comp
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:26:30PM -0400, adam morley wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:27:47PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since April 27, I noticed that ALL my mails pass through outblaze.com, a
> > Hong Kong based company that I susp
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:40:12AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
>
> I wrote:
>
> > > Outblaze is a "third party email outsourcer".
>
> > By "third party email outsourcer", do yo
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:30:46AM -0400, adam morley wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:03:50PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
[snipped]
> > Honestly, I'm not looking for a 100% spam-free environment because
> > that's next to impossible without blocking other l
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 04:13:43PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Horace G. Friend III whacked out:
>
> > I read from the RedHat Sendmail HOWTO that the forward and reverse DNS
> > "should" match. This became necessary due to the prolif
54 matches
Mail list logo
