Re: Problems with a2ps/enscript and printing in mutt

0n Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:30:17PM -0500, Joseph Ishac wrote: >I'm looking to adjust the way mutt prints. I had just been piping >things to lpr, but I decided to try and get a little fancier. You may want to look at: Muttprint pretty-prints mail messages for any mail client whi

Re: Problems with a2ps/enscript and printing in mutt

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:30:17PM -0500, Joseph Ishac wrote: Since print_decode is set, mutt is parsing the message before piping it. I was wondering if there is a way to have mutt hand me the subject of the message so that I could pass it to the -t option of enscript to formulate a title. I'v

Problems with a2ps/enscript and printing in mutt

I'm looking to adjust the way mutt prints. I had just been piping things to lpr, but I decided to try and get a little fancier. So I tried the following two commands: set print_command="enscript -Email --word-wrap -r -t %s -G -2" and set print_command="a2ps -=mail -2" a2ps works nicely, and t

printing problem

Hi, useing muttprint sometimes i cannot print the selceted mail. After pushing 'p' the next mail is printed not the selected. Any idea? Toni

Re: Printing with Mutt

ting DEBUG="1" in your .muttprintrc and have a look at the logfile. It helped me figure out that it was missing a latex package that I had to install first. --><-- I hope it's okay to ask a different print-related question as well: The following macro shall use F5-key to s

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:57:55PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > > > > I just finished setting up Muttprint and I had to have set print="yes" > > uncommented in my .muttrc, and also I had to change PRINT_COMMAND="lpr > > -P$PRINTER"

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:57:55PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > > > > I just finished setting up Muttprint and I had to have set print="yes" > > uncommented in my .muttrc, and also I had to change PRINT_COMMAND="lpr > > -P$PRINTER"

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > > > I just finished setting up Muttprint and I had to have set print="yes" > uncommented in my .muttrc, and also I had to change PRINT_COMMAND="lpr > -P$PRINTER" to > simply PRINT_COMMAND="lpr" in order for Muttprint to work. > Su

Re: Printing with Mutt

> > I'm working on different computer, so I may have missed, but what do you > > have in .muttrc for print_command? > > OK, In .muttrc I have the following: > > set print_command="muttprint" > #set print="yes" > set print_split > > macro index p " > " > macro pager p " > " > > (Mind the lin

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:11:51PM -0700, Michael wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:15:13PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Joost Kremers wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:24:41PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > > I'm working on different computer, so I

Re: Printing with Mutt

pedia.org/wiki/Dialog_(Shell_Script)> Thanks - You're right. I installed Dialog and ran mutt again. This time a funky blue "dialogue" box appeared on my screen telling me that I had not got Text::Iconv, so I installed that too. Now printing gives no error message, but no printout eit

Re: Printing with Mutt

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:24:41PM +, Arthur Dent wrote: > What is "dialog" (I don't remember there being any dependencies > missing). most likely: -- Dr. Joost Kremers Goethe-Universität Institut für Kognitive Linguistik Grüneburgplatz

Re: Printing with Mutt

of prettified mutt printing. I installed muttprint, but now when I try to print I get this: [m...@localhost ~]$ mutt which: no dialog in (/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/home/mark/bin) Can't call method "convert" on an undefined value

Re: Printing with Mutt

On 2009-01-29, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > > On Thursday, January 29 at 04:03 PM, quoth Grant Edwards: >>> Easily - check out the setting "print_command". Personally, I use >>> enscript, which makes it pretty. >> >> Does it handle multipart/alternate prope

Re: Printing with Mutt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, January 29 at 04:03 PM, quoth Grant Edwards: >> Easily - check out the setting "print_command". Personally, I use >> enscript, which makes it pretty. > > Does it handle multipart/alternate properly

Re: Printing with Mutt

On 2009-01-29, Jason S. Zhang wrote: > I would recommend muttprint, haha. Does muttprint handle multipart? I can't find anything in the documentation that mentions it. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is it NOUVELLE at

Re: Printing with Mutt

the left margin is only about 3/16" and a couple of >> characters are always missing from the beginning of all lines. The >> printer defaults to letter size paper and, as I said, it prints fine >> from all other applications. Is there a way to control how Mutt formats >

Re: Printing with Mutt

All is well! I took a good look at the .muttprinrc and saw that the print_command option was incorrectly set. Now everything seems to be working fine, and the printout looks great! Rem

Re: Printing with Mutt

Well, it's gotten a little different. I copied the sample-muttprintrc-en file to ~/.muttprinrc, and now when I try and print this is the error message I get: Press any key to continue...cannot remove path when cwd is /tmp/muttprint-HLua4y for /tmp/muttprint-HLua4y: at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9

Re: Printing with Mutt

> Here is a small tutorial for muttprint: > http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/48/Formatting_Email_with_Muttprint.pdf Well, I had the feeling that it wasn't going to just work straight out of the box. I got muttprint installed, and placed the recommended options and macros in my .muttrc, but

Re: Printing with Mutt

> > Here is a small tutorial for muttprint: > http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/48/Formatting_Email_with_Muttprint.pdf Thank you! Rem

Re: Printing with Mutt

* Rem P Roberti schrieb am Mittwoch, den 28. Januar 2009: > > afaik, mutt does not "format" for printing, but there is a utility > > that prettifies email for printing, muttprint. I like it. > I'll take a look at that. Here is a small tutorial for muttprint: ht

Re: Printing with Mutt

aid, it prints > > fine from all other applications. Is there a way to control how Mutt > > formats a page for printing? > > afaik, mutt does not "format" for printing, but there is a utility > that prettifies email for printing, muttprint. I like it. I'll tak

Re: Printing with Mutt

applications. Is there a way to control how Mutt formats > > a page for printing? > > Easily - check out the setting "print_command". Personally, I use > enscript, which makes it pretty. > > ~Kyle > -- > The governm

Re: Printing with Mutt

re a way to control how Mutt > formats a page for printing? afaik, mutt does not "format" for printing, but there is a utility that prettifies email for printing, muttprint. I like it. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.o

Re: Printing with Mutt

n is only about 3/16" and a couple of > characters are always missing from the beginning of all lines. The > printer defaults to letter size paper and, as I said, it prints fine > from all other applications. Is there a way to control how Mutt formats > a page for printin

Printing with Mutt

aults to letter size paper and, as I said, it prints fine from all other applications. Is there a way to control how Mutt formats a page for printing? TIA... Rem

Re: Problem printing doc-attachments

On Sep 18, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I upgraded to Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 some months ago > and had a similar problem. I fixed it by changing that line to > this: > >application/msword; mutt_rem_bgrun openoffice.org-2.1 -view %s > > I need the "mutt_rem_bgrun

Re: Problem printing doc-attachments

On 2007-09-18, "Wilkinson, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 0n Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:43:42AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > >I need the "mutt_rem_bgrun" command because I run mutt on a Solaris > >machine and run viewers for MS attachments remotely on the Linux > >box. In yo

Re: Problem printing doc-attachments

0n Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:43:42AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: >I need the "mutt_rem_bgrun" command because I run mutt on a Solaris >machine and run viewers for MS attachments remotely on the Linux >box. In your case, this might work: Where does one find details on "mutt_rem_bg

Re: Problem printing doc-attachments

On 2007-09-18, Holger Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not certain this is the right forum to ask this question.. anyway. > > I recently switched Linux distribution (from Debian Sarge to Ubuntu > Feisty) and since that I've the following p

Problem printing doc-attachments

Hi, Ï'm not certain this is the right forum to ask this question.. anyway. I recently switched Linux distribution (from Debian Sarge to Ubuntu Feisty) and since that I've the following problem printing mutt attachments using openoffice (mostly doc-attachments): my system is unabl

Re: antiword and printing

* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-19 00:46]: > Sven Guckes wrote: > > * John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-18 22:16]: > > > Have you figured out a way to print from antiword? > > > I've tried lpr, enscript, a2ps, etc. > > > Nothing works so far. Suggestions? > > > so i use the

Re: antiword and printing

Sven Guckes wrote: > > * John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-18 22:16]: > > Have you figured out a way to print from antiword? I've tried lpr, > > enscript, a2ps, etc. > > Nothing works so far. Suggestions? > ah - the old good guessing game: > just *what* could John have tried? ;-)

Re: antiword and printing

* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-18 22:16]: > Have you figured out a way to print from antiword? > I've tried lpr, enscript, a2ps, etc. > Nothing works so far. Suggestions? ah - the old good guessing game: just *what* could John have tried? ;-) anyway, not every program can be used

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

* Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote: > > > > Thus spake Igor Pruchanskiy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript > > > before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss >

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote: > Thus spake Igor Pruchanskiy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript > > before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss > > makes fun of a cute little penguin :) > Pengu

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thus spake Igor Pruchanskiy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript > before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss > makes fun of a cute little penguin :) Penguin? Bah!

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

On Jan 30, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > * and then Igor Pruchanskiy blurted > > I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript > > before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss > > makes fun of a cute little penguin :) > > Hmmm m

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Igor Pruchanskiy blurted > I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript > before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss > makes fun of a cute little penguin :) Hmmm much thanks eve

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Currently I have to print msg's via the pipe command. I have 2 questions > regarding this: I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss makes fun of a c

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

On Jan 30, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Currently I have to print msg's via the pipe command. I have 2 questions > regarding this: > > 1. How can I print only the headers I see on the screen as opposed to > all of them when I '| lpr'? Well using pipe, set pipe_decode. > 2. Why do

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Currently I have to print msg's via the pipe command. You might want to also check out muttprint. - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP 0xC9C40C31 -=- http://codesorcery.net -BE

2 Q's about printing...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone. Currently I have to print msg's via the pipe command. I have 2 questions regarding this: 1. How can I print only the headers I see on the screen as opposed to all of them when I '| lpr'? 2. Why do I /have/ to pipe to lpr? It doesn't

Re: Printing in Vim: Solved via Oualline's book

On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brendan Cully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday, 14 July 2001 at 18:58, David Champion wrote: > > On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > "John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Am I the only one who'd been stymied at h

Re: Printing in Vim: Solved via Oualline's book

On Saturday, 14 July 2001 at 18:58, David Champion wrote: > On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Am I the only one who'd been stymied at how to print from within vim? > > Am I the only one who's never wanted to print from inside... hmm

Re: Printing in Vim: Solved via Oualline's book

On 2001.07.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John P. Verel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am I the only one who'd been stymied at how to print from within vim? Am I the only one who's never wanted to print from inside... hmm, which is more portable: (el|n)?vi(s|m|per), or (el|n)?vi[sm(per)]

Re: Printing in Vim: Solved via Oualline's book

On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:44:20PM -0400, John P. Verel wrote: > One thing that Oualline's new Vim book solved for me (dummy me) is how to > print to a system printer from within vim: > > :w ! lpr > > Works like a charm, especially in visual mode. > > Am I the only one who'd been stymied at how

Printing in Vim: Solved via Oualline's book

One thing that Oualline's new Vim book solved for me (dummy me) is how to print to a system printer from within vim: :w ! lpr Works like a charm, especially in visual mode. Am I the only one who'd been stymied at how to print from within vim? -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT

Re: bookmarking/printing URLs from within mutt (LONG)

it for later viewing, or print it using the > > printing capabilities of the browser. I am thinking to some > > macros that would use the "netscape remote control capabilities" > > explained in: FWIW - I'll repost a script I've found handy to bring up the entir

Re: bookmarking/printing URLs from within mutt

darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as we are using Perl, use the URI::Find module. It takes > the text to be searched and callback to execute with each match. > > [...] > This is just another variation of the theme for those using wwwoffle: simply putting wwwoffle %s into .u

Re: bookmarking/printing URLs from within mutt

Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/03/2001: > The extracting regular expressions though, has a lot left as an > exercise to the reader. > > I enclose here two functions that I use myself to extract URL:s > from a message. This is not perfect and improvement sugge

bookmarking/printing URLs from within mutt

Hi, Someone was asking about this a few days ago.. I deleted the email, but went to the list archives and found it. > However, it could also be useful to select an URL in the message > body and just bookmark it for later viewing, or print it using the > printing capabilities of the b

bookmarking/printing URLS from within mutt

Hello, there is extensive documentation on how in Mutt you can select an URL into an email message, and have Netscape or whatever browser open it. However, it could also be useful to select an URL in the message body and just bookmark it for later viewing, or print it using the printing

Re: [Fwd: Printing from Mutt] on Cygwin

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:06:46AM -0600, Duke Normandin wrote: > > Are you using Mutt in the Windows Cygwin environment? No. Sorry. Jan.

Re: [Fwd: Printing from Mutt] on Cygwin

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:04:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:01:36PM -0600, Duke Normandin wrote: > > I stumbled on how to print a message from Mutt, so I'd like to pass it > > on. > > > > I use the "pipe" command, then 'cat >>lpt1' from the 'index' or the > >

Re: [Fwd: Printing from Mutt] on Cygwin

On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:01:36PM -0600, Duke Normandin wrote: > I stumbled on how to print a message from Mutt, so I'd like to pass it > on. > > I use the "pipe" command, then 'cat >>lpt1' from the 'index' or the > 'pager', as follows: > > | > cat >>lpt1 Thnx, but I push the 'p'-key and all i

[Fwd: Printing from Mutt] on Cygwin

I sent the enclosed to the Cygwin list. However, I thought that perhaps it might be useful to someone on this list as well. Enjoy! -- -duke Calgary, Alberta, Canada I stumbled on how to print a message from Mutt, so I'd like to pass it on. I use the "pipe" command, then 'cat >>lpt1' from the

Cygwin-Mutt: Printing a msg

Anybody have a clue as to how I can print a message from Mutt which is running on Cygwin? Just to an old DM printer... -- -duke Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

Hi All, I like to thank everyone who tried to help me with error produced when I try to run: man procmail | col -b > procmail.txt I never got to solve the problem but I've made, upon suggestions and tips from list members, a good procmail.ps from using the -t option of the "man" command. Thanks

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

Hi Conor, I checked (just to make sure) man procmail, man procmailrc, man procmailex, man groff, man nroff, man col ... and they're all installed. I also did rpm -q man and I've got man-1.5h-22 installed. I also did a man procmail | col -b > procmail.txt 2> errors.txt I still got the same er

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:46:26PM +0800 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Horace G. Friend III thought: > Hi Rich, > > Here's the output from man procmail | col -b > procmail.txt > > sh: -c: line 2: syntax error: unexpected end of line > Error executing formatting or display command. > System c

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

hope you'll oblige. > > I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer > > (HP710C). :( I'd like to convert several man pages into plain > > text and save it to my windoze dir. How can I do that? > > > > I've tried this comman

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:50:23PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi All, > > This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I hope you'll oblige. > I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer > (HP710C). :( I'd like to

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

> > Hi All, > > > > This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I hope you'll oblige. > > I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer > > (HP710C). :( I'd like to convert several man pages into plain > > text and save it to my wind

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:50:23PM +0800 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Horace G. Friend III thought: > Hi All, > > This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I hope you'll oblige. > I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer > (HP710C). :(

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

a PostScript version of your manual pages, which may be more suitable for printing. -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

man procmailrc > proc.txt works fine On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:50:23PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III muttered: | Hi All, | | This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I hope you'll oblige. | I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer | (HP710C). :( I'd li

Re: off-topic (printing man pages)

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:50:23PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote: : : This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I hope you'll oblige. : I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer : (HP710C). :( I'd like to convert several man pages into plain : text and

off-topic (printing man pages)

Hi All, This is off-topic but I need a quick fix so I hope you'll oblige. I still do double-sided printing in windoze because of my printer (HP710C). :( I'd like to convert several man pages into plain text and save it to my windoze dir. How can I do that? I've tried

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

Dirk Laurie wrote: > The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">" > has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm > to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended. There's an example of commands to put in your vimrc file that will automatica

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:57:33AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Jed is a very good editor that has a mail_mode that does smart >formatting of quoted paragraphs. No more ">" characters in the >middle of lines. I've always been a big fan of GNUEmacs, and text mode has ">" quoting reformatting c

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

I realize this is drifting from the original question, but setting textwidth=77 in vim will activate word-wrapping as you compose the message (wraps at 77 chars in this case). This feature is useful if you compose in a wide terminal, or if you're tired of hitting at the end of each line... Zac

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

Try this: set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:>'" -Justin Thus spake Dirk Laurie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > J?rgen Salk skryf: > > Dirk Laurie wrote: > > > > > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However,

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:49:03AM -0600, David Champion wrote: > On 2001.02.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Dirk Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">" > > has already been prepended to the line. > > Try using "p

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

On 2001.02.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dirk Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">" > has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm > to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended. The

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001, Jürgen Salk wrote: > If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted > lines by the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the > current line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed > with the "." command. Or just type "gqG" which will r

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:55:11PM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote: > > > The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">" > has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm > to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended. Check your comments and fo

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

; long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the >

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

Dirk Laurie wrote: > The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">" > has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm > to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended. I understand quite exactly what you want. Just try this "gqG" thing with vi

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Dirk Laurie wrote: > Jürgen Salk skryf: > > Dirk Laurie wrote: > > > > > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when > > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are > > > gone, and the

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

Jürgen Salk skryf: > Dirk Laurie wrote: > > > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are > > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the > viewer-form

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

how do you do this On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:02:11AM +0100, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered: | *[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]: | | > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when | > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenien

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

Jürgen Salk wrote: > Yes, I have intentionally used overlength lines, such > that you can check it out. Have fun. Ahem, this bloody damned web interface, I'm using right now, seems to have it's own idea of breaking lines. :-) Regards - Juergen. -- Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

Dirk Laurie wrote: > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the viewer-formatted version instead of the original when print

Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

*[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]: > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the > viewer-forma

Word-wrap when printing and quoting

show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or quoting? Dirk

Re: Printing w3m paged attachment

. You could then print from your editor. I hear that a lot of improvements have been made to the development version of w3m and that there will be another release soon. Maybe printing will be among them. Regarding trying to print an HTML attachment from within mutt: if you are literally pipi

Re: Printing w3m pages attachment: Looking for mailcap entry.

John P. Verel wrote: > I'm looking for a good mailcap entry to print from a w3m paged html > attachment from within mutt. Any suggestions? > Well this works for my mutt attchments: text/html; /usr/bin/w3m -T text/html '%s'; needsterminal; description=HTMLText; nametemplate=%s.html -- ~~

Printing w3m paged attachment

Upon re-reading this, I see I misstated my question. Viewing within Mutt works fine with a mailcap entry like this: text/html; w3m -T text/html -dump %s; copiousoutput. However, piping to lpr or enscript produces either a) a mess or b) nothing. What I'm seeking is a way to natively print within

Printing w3m pages attachment: Looking for mailcap entry.

I'm looking for a good mailcap entry to print from a w3m paged html attachment from within mutt. Any suggestions? TIA -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT

Re: printing doesn't work

On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 04:13:07PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian rearranged the electrons to read: > Erwin Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:58:31 +0100]: > > > I've a little problem: Printing a message seems to work - I get the message: > > "ma

Re: printing doesn't work

Erwin Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:58:31 +0100]: > I've a little problem: Printing a message seems to work - I get the message: > "masseage printed" in the status line - but nothing happens. My printing > queue is empty. When I save the mess

printing doesn't work

I've a little problem: Printing a message seems to work - I get the message: "masseage printed" in the status line - but nothing happens. My printing queue is empty. When I save the message and print via "lpr message" everything works well. Any idea what might be wrong? Erwin

Re: Printing tagged messages.

Of course just after I sent the message I tried again and found where the thing is! I added a "fputc ('\n', fp);" after the "fputc ('\f',fp);" in command.c and now it works perfectly. Still, maybe it's something that should be done in the next release, it's up to the mantainers... Thanks.

Printing tagged messages.

Hi, I have a (possibly) weird request for mutt. I am using version 1.2.5i and my problem is printing several tagged mails. I use this set print_command="a2ps -b"" -R -q --pretty-print=mail -1 " and what happens is that all the mail are printed properly, each one in hi

Re: printing & octet-stream attachments

a message that includes a octet-stream attachment, the > > attachment also gets dumped to the printer. > > I believe there is a mailcap syntax to specify commands for printing. > I also believe that Mutt pays attention to these. Perhaps adding a > command "; print=/bin/tru

Re: printing & octet-stream attachments

ts dumped to the printer. I believe there is a mailcap syntax to specify commands for printing. I also believe that Mutt pays attention to these. Perhaps adding a command "; print=/bin/true" will cause octet-stream attachments to be skipped? Or an alternate filter could be run? -- D

printing & octet-stream attachments

In my mailcap file, I have a line to invoke Dave Pearson's octet filter: application/octet-stream; mutt.octet.filter %s; copiousoutput This works great for viewing octet-stream attachments. However, if I print a message that includes a octet-stream attachment, the attachment also gets dumpe

Printing with only some headers

Hi, how can I make mutt print only some (ie important) header lines? Right now I use: set print_command='enscript -2 -r -G -i3' which results in all headers being printed. So I piped the mail through sed/formail before passing it to enscript, and that worked, but I wonder if there is a nicer

  1   2   >