On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
> break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
> will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
> long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus
> signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
> printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
> viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
> quoting?
Personally I use Vim as my editor, so I use gq on the message to rejustify
it in a reply. That won't help for printing though.
Many at my workplace use M$ Lookout! too...
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good
idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous
sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925
