Dirk Laurie wrote:

> signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer.  However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> gone, and the result looks terrible.  Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
> quoting?

If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted lines by
the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the current 
line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed with the "."
command. Or just type "gqG" which will reformat every line until the end. 

Yes, I have intentionally used overlength lines, such that you can check it
out. Have fun. ;-)

Best regards - Juergen


-- 
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net

Reply via email to