Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines.  I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions.  The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus 
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer.  However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible.  Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
quoting?

Dirk

Reply via email to