Re: Mailing lists

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 02:05:52AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > So tell us, how does neomutt handle mailing lists? I don't think there's a difference in the commands explicitly related to lists, it's just that there are more ways to search in general. IIRC. It has been a while. -- Ian

Re: Mailing lists

Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/29 00:15 -0400): > Patterns have > ~l ("messages addressed to a known mailing list") > ~u ("messages addressed to a subscribed mailing list") > > Apparently those also work by comparing To: and CC: to commands "lists&qu

Re: Mailing lists

On 2025/05/29 00:35, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote: This is also an area where neomutt has some extra features, so it may be worth looking at. I'm biased because I contributed code to neomutt. So tell us, how does neomutt handle mailing lists?

Re: Mailing lists

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:15:07AM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > Patterns have > ~l ("messages addressed to a known mailing list") > ~u ("messages addressed to a subscribed mailing list") > Apparently those also work by comparing To: and CC: to command

Re: Mailing lists

t") ~u ("messages addressed to a subscribed mailing list") Apparently those also work by comparing To: and CC: to commands "lists" and "subscribe", and to $auto_subscribe. They could be made to also look at List-ID:, but you might find them somewhat useful now.

Re: Mailing lists

Dear Kurt, Many thanks for this response, I find it very helpful. Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:42 -0400): > On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 08:47:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > > It sure would be a lot simpler to: > > > Eliminate commands "

Re: Mailing lists

t; One final note: I don't now how other muttusers go about archiving > > their emails but I continue to have dedicated mailboxes (maildirs, > > to be precise) for mailing lists and this, too, requires a quantity > > of configuration that can be found a bit cumberso

Re: Mailing lists

Nuno Silva via Mutt-users (2025/05/18 10:21 +0100): > On 2025-05-17, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > > > As I understand it, knowing whether a user is subscribed to a list or > > not is also very helpful to make sure we do not get responses twice. I > > do not knowwhether I am wrong or right but I alw

Re: Mailing lists

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:23:20PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:42:08PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > > Mutt needs to know what addresses are mailing lists to generate the > > header Mail-Followup-To:, which asks recipients not to send duplicate >

Re: Mail-Followup-To header; was: Mailing lists

On 19 May 2025 14:23 -0700, from mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net (Will Yardley): > As best I understand, M-F-T is a draft from 1997 that expired in > 1998(?), never made progress towards becoming a standard (and is only > implemented by a handful of other clients other than Mutt, none of which > are s

Re: Mailing lists

On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:42:08PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > Mutt needs to know what addresses are mailing lists to generate the > header Mail-Followup-To:, which asks recipients not to send duplicate > messages to you. As best I understand, M-F-T is a draft from 1997 that expire

Re: Mailing lists

On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 08:47:40AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: It sure would be a lot simpler to: Eliminate commands "(un)subscribe" and "(un)lists" Eliminate $auto_subscribe Identify messages from lists by List-ID: Make only send to List-Post:, and fail i

Re: Mailing lists

tion that I find it way more convenient to tell lists to send me copies of my own posts, which then get filed just like the rest of the list traffic. That way I can just set all the save / fcc variables to /dev/null for lists. -- Ian

Re: Mailing lists

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > One final note: I don't now how other muttusers go about archiving > their emails but I continue to have dedicated mailboxes (maildirs, > to be precise) for mailing lists and this, too, requires a quantity >

Re: Mailing lists

On 2025-05-17, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > As I understand it, knowing whether a user is subscribed to a list or > not is also very helpful to make sure we do not get responses twice. I > do not knowwhether I am wrong or right but I always foundMutt's way of > dealing with the situation superior t

Re: Mailing lists

On 2025-05-17, Will Yardley wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > >> > When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your >> > work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib direc

Re: Mailing lists

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > > When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your > > work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib directory, say. > Yes, I guess that somewhere

Re: Mailing lists

On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Thanks alot, Chris! > > When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your > work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib directory, say. Or maybe if > the manual has a "Useful links" section there could be a lin

Re: Mailing lists

Thanks alot, Chris! When I suggested to share I was more thinking about e.g. adding your work to Mutt's repo, if there is a contrib directory, say. Or maybe if the manual has a "Useful links" section there could be a link to a public repository or so, so that your contribution receives the attenti

Re: Mailing lists

ay I will write a > > > generator to generate my Mutt configuration from a less verbose format. > > > > > Yes. What I do is have a configuration file in which I have all my > > lists and this is used to autogenerate the required subscribe and > > other mutt config

Re: Mailing lists

list and > > duplicate such lines I feel a bit sad about the redundancy, to the point > > that I regularly find myself thinking that one day I will write a > > generator to generate my Mutt configuration from a less verbose format. > > > Yes. What I do is have a configuration

Re: Mailing lists

day I will write a > generator to generate my Mutt configuration from a less verbose format. > Yes. What I do is have a configuration file in which I have all my lists and this is used to autogenerate the required subscribe and other mutt configuration. The same file is used by a Python s

Re: Mailing lists

7;s way of handling lists, I must say I find the configurations of lists rather cumbersome at the moment so the simplifications you propose would be more than welcome. Perhaps, in the absence of a List-Post, we would need a kind of map to associate the content of List-Id to a List-Post value? As I und

Re: Mailing lists

On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 05:27:51PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: [snip] > > It sure would be a lot simpler to: > Eliminate commands "(un)subscribe" and "(un)lists" > Eliminate $auto_subscribe > Identify messages from lists by List-ID: > M

Mailing lists

;L') both do that. Mutt doesn't use List-ID: at all. It sure would be a lot simpler to: Eliminate commands "(un)subscribe" and "(un)lists" Eliminate $auto_subscribe Identify messages from lists by List-ID: Make only send to List-Post:, and fail if it's absent There are more complex possibilities, too.

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

supposed to be for trapping spam, but users cannot control it and it seems to randomly drop mails. On some lists I have received posts to check if my mail is still working because of dropped mail. Meanwhile, yesterday I posted to a texlive list and did not see my mail appear. A little while

Re: Mailing lists [was: using a light theme...]

way -- doesn't seem like the > right approach. > > We need a new function, , that decides where to send a reply. > > That function could have extensive configuration written by each user, a set > of rules that can look at the whole message header section, at the lists > th

Mailing lists [was: using a light theme...]

bind index,pager R reply' >message-hook ~l 'bind index,pager r list-reply; bind index,pager R reply' >message-hook '~C g...@vger.kernel.org' 'bind index,pager r group-reply; bind >index R reply' Ah, I missed ~l. That's better than what I suggested, u

Re: Mailing lists [was: using a light theme...]

That function could have extensive configuration written by each user, a set of rules that can look at the whole message header section, at the lists that are subscribed to or known, at the values of all configuration variables, at where the message is stored... Or, if that's not general eno

Re: Mailing lists [was: using a light theme...]

Kurt Hackenberg wrote: >>I had `folder-hook '=lists/'` too, but `message-hook` has >>replaced that for me. I may not need `folder-hook .` >>anymore, but I haven't changed or tested it in several >>years. > > I think you don't need it. Looks like

Mailing lists [was: using a light theme...]

he subject: https://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html I agree with that, myself -- lists shouldn't hack up Reply-To:. Especially because, as that post says, that subverts the intent of Reply-To:, and so breaks things. That post doesn't even mention things like Mutt'

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:51:24PM -0500, J wrote: Worth mentioning is that mutt has a list menu, bound by default to Esc + 'L'. This can be a handy way to unsubscribe to lists, even some marketing emails. Damn, one never stops learning. Thanks for this tip, it's super-useful.

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

Worth mentioning is that mutt has a list menu, bound by default to Esc + 'L'. This can be a handy way to unsubscribe to lists, even some marketing emails. Quoting Akshay Hegde via Mutt-users from Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 06:13:15PM CDT: > On 2025-04-11 22:55 +0100, Ken Moffat via Mut

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

On 2025-04-11 22:55 +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:19:36AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:45PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > >> Per , the

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

he previous attempts which procmail filtered to 'queries', but inadequate. MAybe there is some further form of words needed in the body of the mail. > > But also, the headers of all messages from the kernel.org > lists have the customary List-* items. For example, here'

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

oorly summarize, conflate, and (often) make things up. But also, the headers of all messages from the kernel.org lists have the customary List-* items. For example, here's what the git list at vger contains: List-Id: List-Subscribe: <mailto:git+subscr...@vger.kernel.org> Lis

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:03:45PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote: > >> Not really a mutt-specific issue, but I think I've spotted your error. > >> The format for commands is listname+comm...@lists.

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote: >> Not really a mutt-specific issue, but I think I've spotted your error. >> The format for commands is listname+comm...@lists.linux.dev. You seem to >> have them backwards. Try sending to linux-kern

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

the advertised protocol for unsubscribing from lists, but sometimes the lists are broken or the instructions are wrong, and then I do as above. We only live once. -- Ian

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Sean Greenslade wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:40:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote: [...] > > > > The following failed: > > > > unsubscribe+linux-ker...@lists.linux.dev > > host smtp.subspace.kernel.org [44.238.234.78] > > SMTP

Re: Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:40:52PM +0100, Ken Moffat via Mutt-users wrote: > Now that all the vger.kernel.org lists have moved to subspace, the > old Majordomo unsub process is rejected. I used to read the kernel > list, and test late rc kernels, then more recently I just skimmed > th

Anyone used mutt to sub or unsub to linux kerrel lists ?

Now that all the vger.kernel.org lists have moved to subspace, the old Majordomo unsub process is rejected. I used to read the kernel list, and test late rc kernels, then more recently I just skimmed the list a few times a week, looking at posts I thought might be relevant to my machines. But I

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Nicolas George (12024-12-05): > I grant you that the case of announces mailing-lists is not properly > covered by the “always reply to all and let reply-to take care of it” > method. There is no way to write in the mail “if the user tries to > reply to all, strongly suggest

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

sking personal embarassment, when you > were trying to reply to a single person). Ah, but see, you are getting it wrong / strawmanning it here. You configure the list software to set the reply-to on lists like this one where replying to everybody is the norm, because people ask questions, give a

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 09:49:29PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (12024-12-05): > > Gmail definitely lets you select between Reply and Reply All, and it > > respects Reply-To as far as I can tell. > > Google's webmail respects reply-to but lets users override it.

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (12024-12-05): > Gmail definitely lets you select between Reply and Reply All, and it > respects Reply-To as far as I can tell. Google's webmail respects reply-to but lets users override it. As it should. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 12:43:12PM -0500, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > On 2024/12/05 01:08, Rene Kita wrote: > > > I wonder if the argument that modern MUAs make it easy to choose between > > 'reply' and 'group reply'/'reply all' still holds. > > The List-*: headers probably didn't exist 25 years ago

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

times, then the error rate drops to 1%. Based on my experience, with a significant portion of mail coming from mailing-lists with reply-to set, I estimate that “always reply to all” is right better than 90% of the times. A standard written taking human fallibleness in account could have achieved at

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

ely lets you select between Reply and Reply All, and it respects Reply-To as far as I can tell. I never use it to read lists so I can't say if it does anything beyond -- if it modifies its behavior in that case, or if it show any additional UI. -- Ian

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On 2024/12/05 01:08, Rene Kita wrote: I wonder if the argument that modern MUAs make it easy to choose between 'reply' and 'group reply'/'reply all' still holds. Thunderbird makes it easy. It also has a third command, "reply list". (I suppose it recog

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:08:45AM +0100, Rene Kita wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 08:59:18PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 09:05:19AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > [...] > > > Adding “Reply-To: $address_of_the_list” is a more reliable way of doing > > > it. Most mailing

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

gt; > chosen to do it myself for those that do not. > > The war is probably long over, and you're probably right that it's the > least annoying thing, especially for non-technical lists, but seeing > this brought me back to the days when I actually used mailing lists >

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Gregor Zattler via Mutt-users wrote: > * Sadeep Madurange [2024-10-27; 10:38 +08]: > > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > > > Is

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Sirius via Mutt-users (12024-11-26): > You can tell people "do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list", and hope > that they follow the advise. Adding “Reply-To: $address_of_the_list” is a more reliable way of doing it. Most mailing-list software I know do it by default, and I have chosen to do it

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On mån, 2024/11/25 at 19:46:34 +0100, Gregor Zattler via Mutt-users wrote: > Hi Sadeep, > * Sadeep Madurange [2024-10-27; 10:38 +08]: > > Hello, > > > > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > > email address. So, I get two copies

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Hi Sadeep, * Sadeep Madurange [2024-10-27; 10:38 +08]: > Hello, > > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? since you use m

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

s mutt to add “Reply-To: mutt-users@mutt.org” when writing to > > mutt-users, and will tell people who reply to reply to the list > > rather than you. > > > > Most mailing-list do that for you, this one, along with the Debian > > ones, is one of the few I know that do not, expecti

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On 271024, 11:06, John Hawkinson wrote: > I just want to point out a few things: > > . What is described as "two copies" is really two different messages that > contain some different information. > . Sometimes those differences are important to keep track of. > . When a mailing list delays deliv

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Marcus C. Gottwald (12024-10-27): > Mutt offers the pattern "~=" that matches on "duplicated > messages". You might be able to achieve the desired behaviour > by limiting the index display to "!~=". Note that limiting the display in mutt's listing will not help with the time wasted by checking the

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Sadeep Madurange wrote (Sun 2024-Oct-27 10:38:01 +0800): > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? Mutt offers the patte

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

of the few I know that do not, expecting users to adhere to the > failed “List-Reply-To” standard instead. No, this is not a fair statement ("Most"). There is an immense variety in how mailing lists on the Internet work, and it's almost impossible to make accurate statements abo

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Sadeep Madurange (12024-10-27): > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? Hi. You can add this to your config file: send-ho

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On 27.10.24 10:38, Sadeep Madurange wrote: > Hello, > > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? If you use procmai

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On 2024-10-27 10:38, Sadeep Madurange wrote: > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? Not sure if it's as automatic as you

Re: Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

On 271024, 10:38, Sadeep Madurange wrote: > Hello, > > In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my > email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. > > Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? > > --

Two copies of email when cc-ed in mailing lists

Hello, In some lists, users send replies to the list address while cc-ing my email address. So, I get two copies of the same email. Is there anything I can do so that I only receive/see one copy? -- Sadeep Madurange PGP: 103BF9E3E750BF7E

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:04:03PM -0600, boB Stepp wrote: > On 21/02/16 12:28AM, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > > On 2021-02-16 00:17:22, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > > > On 2021-02-15 16:01:06, boB Stepp wrote: > > > > > On Monday, 15 February at 21:53, boB Stepp wrote: > > > > > > And from reading the Mu

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

On 2021-02-15 18:04:03, boB Stepp wrote: > On 21/02/16 00:28, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > > On 2021-02-16 00:17:22, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > > > On 2021-02-15 16:01:06, boB Stepp wrote: > > > > And "alternates" is still a mystery... > > > > > > It is used if you have any alternate or old email addresses

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

On 21/02/16 12:28AM, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: On 2021-02-16 00:17:22, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: On 2021-02-15 16:01:06, boB Stepp wrote: > > On Monday, 15 February at 21:53, boB Stepp wrote: > > > And from reading the Mutt manual I have encountered the > > > alternates option, but now I am not sure wha

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

On 2021-02-16 00:17:22, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > On 2021-02-15 16:01:06, boB Stepp wrote: > > > On Monday, 15 February at 21:53, boB Stepp wrote: > > > > And from reading the Mutt manual I have encountered the > > > > alternates option, but now I am not sure what it is useful for > > > > and how t

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

On 2021-02-15 16:01:06, boB Stepp wrote: > > On Monday, 15 February at 21:53, boB Stepp wrote: > > > And from reading the Mutt manual I have encountered the alternates > > > option, but now I am not sure what it is useful for and how to > > > most effectively use it. > > And "alternates" is still

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

On 21/02/15 10:33PM, Wim wrote: On Monday, 15 February at 21:53, boB Stepp wrote: ...BTW, typing "Mu" into the "To:" field and then hitting does *not* fill in the email address; instead, it brings up a browser view where I have to hit before the address is inserted. Is there a way, when ther

Re: Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

Hi boB, On Monday, 15 February at 21:53, boB Stepp wrote: > The current ongoing thread about lists and subscribe have led to my email. I > don't think I am understanding the differences and interactions to these > different Mutt configuration possibilities. > > From the

Differences and interactions between subscribe, lists, group, alternates and alias.

The current ongoing thread about lists and subscribe have led to my email. I don't think I am understanding the differences and interactions to these different Mutt configuration possibilities. From the other thread if I am understanding correctly for those mailing lists that I am subscrib

Re: Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:32:54PM +, Chris Green wrote: I think L[ist reply] depends on there being a List-Id header in the list's messages to work if the list isn't in lists/subscribe. Most of the lists I use do have List-Id headers but not (quite) all. Yes, you're r

Re: Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:30:38AM -0500, José María Mateos wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:50:55PM +, Chris Green wrote: > > Currently I automatically add all mailing lists I am subscribed to > > into my muttrc file against both 'lists' and 'subscribe&#x

Re: Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:04:15PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: > 12021/01/05 03:27.03 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Chris Green ಬರೆದರು: >> Currently I automatically add all mailing lists I am subscribed to >> into my muttrc file against both 'lists' and 'subscribe', is this >>

Re: Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:50:55PM +, Chris Green wrote: Currently I automatically add all mailing lists I am subscribed to into my muttrc file against both 'lists' and 'subscribe', is this correct/OK? I never added any mailing list I'm subscribed to, and everyt

Re: Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:04:15PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: > 12021/01/05 03:27.03 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Chris Green ಬರೆದರು: > > > > Currently I automatically add all mailing lists I am subscribed to > > into my muttrc file against both 'lists' and 'subscribe', is

Re: Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

12021/01/05 03:27.03 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Chris Green ಬರೆದರು: > > Currently I automatically add all mailing lists I am subscribed to > into my muttrc file against both 'lists' and 'subscribe', is this > correct/OK? > > I've never been quite clear why there

Should I have all my mailing lists in both 'lists' and 'subscribe'?

Currently I automatically add all mailing lists I am subscribed to into my muttrc file against both 'lists' and 'subscribe', is this correct/OK? I've never been quite clear why there are two commands. I have in my muttrc :- # # # Mailing lists

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta wrote (Fri 2020-Nov-27 14:10:35 +0100): > I tried a few minutes too, and for whatever reason the following seems to work > (i.e., skip to the first blank line after the headers, then to the next blank > line): > > macro pager S \^\\s+\$ Thanks! I've been using tha

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Le 27/11/20 11:18, Francesco Ariis a écrit: > Il 27 novembre 2020 alle 09:35 Marcus C. Gottwald ha scritto: > > So if I use that approach for searching for an empty line, I > > should be able to first skip the email's header and then continue > > jumping down paragraph by paragraph using the same k

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Il 27 novembre 2020 alle 09:35 Marcus C. Gottwald ha scritto: > So if I use that approach for searching for an empty line, I > should be able to first skip the email's header and then continue > jumping down paragraph by paragraph using the same key? Mhhh after a few minutes of trying, I cannot se

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Francesco Ariis wrote (Thu 2020-Nov-26 22:27:20 +0100): > > > ... Or is there a key to "skip to the body of the email" quickly, in the > > > pager? .. > macro pager Q Sub Interesting, thanks! So if I use that approach for searching for an empty line, I should be able to first skip the ema

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:46:31PM +0100, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote: Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta wrote (Thu 2020-Nov-26 15:54:26 +0100): ... Or is there a key to "skip to the body of the email" quickly, in the pager? +1 for adding such a function if it doesn't already exist. This is fairly

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Oh, you're right, it's a hack, but a good one. Thanks! Le 26/11/20 22:27, Francesco Ariis a écrit: > Il 26 novembre 2020 alle 21:46 Marcus C. Gottwald ha scritto: > > Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta wrote (Thu 2020-Nov-26 15:54:26 +0100): > > > ... Or is there a key to "skip to the body of the email"

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Il 26 novembre 2020 alle 21:46 Marcus C. Gottwald ha scritto: > Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta wrote (Thu 2020-Nov-26 15:54:26 +0100): > > ... Or is there a key to "skip to the body of the email" quickly, in the > > pager? > > +1 for adding such a function if it doesn't already exist. Not the prett

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta wrote (Thu 2020-Nov-26 15:54:26 +0100): > ... Or is there a key to "skip to the body of the email" quickly, in the > pager? +1 for adding such a function if it doesn't already exist. Cheers, Marcus -- Marcus C. Gottwald ·· @mcg:cheers.de

Re: Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Hi, Am Do, 26. Nov 2020 um 15:54:26 +0100 schrieb Raphaël Fournier-S'niehotta: Some people use very long lists of emails in the To or Cc fields. It makes […] Is it possible to customize the displayed headers, more than with the classic "ignore * / unignore from date subject to

Folding or weeding long lists of emails in To/CC fields, or skip to content key

Hello all, Some people use very long lists of emails in the To or Cc fields. It makes scrolling to the actual content rather long. I do not want to hide those fields on a permanent basis, but I would welcome either: - a key, similar to the "h / display-toggle-weed", which would toggle

Re: more general hooks to handle similar mailing lists

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, Remco Rnders wrote: > > save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1 > I know it is not a direct answer to your question, but it might perhaps get > the > end result you want; Have you considered using procmail or a sieve filter to > automatically save mail matching you

Re: more general hooks to handle similar mailing lists

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 08:08:07AM +0200, Claus wrote in <20201011060807.ga46...@kiel.esmtp.org>: I'm trying to use a more generic approach for some patterns to handle mailing list, e.g., something like: save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1 instead of having one entry for each maili

Re: more general hooks to handle similar mailing lists

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 08:08:07AM +0200, Claus Assmann wrote: I'm trying to use a more generic approach for some patterns to handle mailing list, e.g., something like: save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1 instead of having one entry for each mailing list. Is that possible with the

more general hooks to handle similar mailing lists

I'm trying to use a more generic approach for some patterns to handle mailing list, e.g., something like: save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1 instead of having one entry for each mailing list. Is that possible with the current mutt features? It seems that back-references in regular

Replying to lists and aliases

utomated with a bash script when I've saved a new list message into a =Lists/list-addr...@address.tld/ folder. Can this behaviour be changed with the format of the subscribe command? I don't see anything relevant in the docs. At the moment I'm just using 'subscribe email@address'

Re: mails to lists automatically?

> break my fingers every time. > Yes, that would be nice. :-) My problem is that nearly all my replies are to mailing lists so I get so used to 'L' that I forget and use it always. -- Chris Green

Re: mails to lists automatically?

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:27:40AM EST, Francesco Ariis wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:19:59PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > On 2017-02-20 10:50:47 Jon LaBadie hacked into the keyboard: > > > Something similar may already be in there, the "L" command. > > > If set up, 'L' replies to the l

Re: mails to lists automatically?

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:19:59PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > On 2017-02-20 10:50:47 Jon LaBadie hacked into the keyboard: > > Something similar may already be in there, the "L" command. > > If set up, 'L' replies to the list, 'r' replies to the > > message poster. > > ;-) I use mutt since

Re: mails to lists automatically?

On 2017-02-20 10:50:47 Jon LaBadie hacked into the keyboard: > Something similar may already be in there, the "L" command. > If set up, 'L' replies to the list, 'r' replies to the > message poster. ;-) I use mutt since 1999 and I am on more then 60 mailinglists, which mean, I know RTL. I do not

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >