Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your feedback! Chris Green (2025/05/17 14:39 +0100): > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:49:16PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > > For instance here is the configuration I have for this list: > > > > subscribe mutt-users@mutt.org > > fcc-hook '~t mutt-users@mutt.org|~c mutt-users@mutt.org' '=list/mutt-users/' > > save-hook '~t mutt-users@mutt.org|~c mutt-users@mutt.org' > > '=list/mutt-users/' > > > > It's definitely not unbearable, but each time I add a mailing list and > > duplicate such lines I feel a bit sad about the redundancy, to the point > > that I regularly find myself thinking that one day I will write a > > generator to generate my Mutt configuration from a less verbose format. > > > Yes. What I do is have a configuration file in which I have all my > lists and this is used to autogenerate the required subscribe and > other mutt configuration.
Yes it's what I said I intended to do. You may want to share you rscript! > The same file is used by a Python script > that routes incoming list mail to separate mailboxes. Which is the part I would not keep, to save me from not reading most of my e-mails ahah. :) But the script could also generate procmail rules... Best wishes, Seb.
