On 13May2024 10:49, Joe Damato via Mutt-users wrote:
And now when I switch to the netdev directory within mutt (by pressing
c),
I can easily see any messages that mention my email address in any thread
on the list.
Late to the thread, and purely for interest: this is what I use for the
use is a folder hook:
>
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#folder-hook
Thanks that worked perfectly.
Just incase anyone stumbles on this thread later, here's what I ended up
doing in my muttrc to help manage email for the netdev kernel mailing
list with my gmail account:
1. My company uses gma
In days of yore (Sun, 12 May 2024), Joe Damato via Mutt-users thus quoth:
> I am subscribed to some high traffic email lists (linux kernel development
> stuff).
>
> There are two cases I am trying to deal with which are fairly similar:
>
> 1. I am subscribed to a maili
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 04:49:45PM -0700, Joe Damato via Mutt-users wrote:
A follow up question: is there a way to apply this to only specific
imap directories?
What you now want to use is a folder hook:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#folder-hook
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:13:47AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> Il 12 maggio 2024 alle 14:47 Joe Damato via Mutt-users ha scritto:
> > Is there any way to get mutt to highlight/colorize/mark or somehow
> > indicate to me messages which specifically have my email in the TO or CC
>
Hello Joe,
Il 12 maggio 2024 alle 14:47 Joe Damato via Mutt-users ha scritto:
> Is there any way to get mutt to highlight/colorize/mark or somehow
> indicate to me messages which specifically have my email in the TO or CC
> line so that I don't miss those?
This is what I do. First you add a score
similar:
1. I am subscribed to a mailing list. I start a thread (usually with git
send-email) on the list and other developers on the list reply via
"reply-all". Since they reply-all, their message will contain the
email list I am subscribed to and my personal email addres
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:25:57PM +0800, "Kevin J. McCarthy"
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> > I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command
> > which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases
> > is "debian"
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command
which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases
is "debian" and the email address in question does contain "+debian"
but that shouldn't matter.
Hi,
Someone recently emailed me. Technically it was a reply to an
old email of mine. Since then, a few emails have gone back and
forth between us. All of my outgoing mails to this one address
have had a Mail-Followup-To header added. I have no idea why.
The address isn't mentioned in any "subscrib
Hi Everyone,
Recently Gmail has started bouncing emails with any DKIM failures. One
source of these failures is the:
'Sender: Mutt-users '
header added by the mailing list.
I realize some of you may be filtering based on that header, but I'm
seeing a large number of boun
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:46:04PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> When is it useful to have a mailing list to which
> you are not subscribed "known"?
IIRC, the original purpose was mostly to setup the (not ever ratified as
a real standard, and not commonly used now) mail
While researching my response in another topic I came
across the "subscribe" list that I don't recall seeing
previously. I've been using the "lists" list for the
same purpose.
As I read it, "lists" items are known mailing lists
and possibly subscribed to
Il 05 febbraio 2021 alle 12:25 Will Yardley ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
> > What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the
> > subject line?
> >
> > For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly
> > fi
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
> What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the
> subject line?
>
> For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly
> filter them out.
Seems like that might be challenging - even if Mutt
What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the
subject line?
For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly
filter them out.
thanks
Alex
Hello meine,
Il 19 gennaio 2021 alle 20:31 meine ha scritto:
> hi,
>
> I want to share a short introduction as a new list member.
>
> Am a mutt user since about 10 years after discovering the beauty and
> power of using CLI. Maybe not a 'power user' knowing a
Welkom Meine!
Glad to hear you enjoy using mutt. If you have any questions, feel free to ask
here. If someone else has questions and you know (part of) the answer, your
input is greatly appreciated.
Kind regards,
Remco
hi,
I want to share a short introduction as a new list member.
Am a mutt user since about 10 years after discovering the beauty and
power of using CLI. Maybe not a 'power user' knowing all possibilities,
but just practical -- mutt is my email work horse.
I use mutt on FreeBSD, part
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:40:42PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
[snip]
This looks like an old bug in Mutt's List-Post parser. Feel free to
open a gitlab ticket. Regardless, I'll add to my todo list and make
sure this fix is in the next release.
I can certainly do that if it w
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:45:13PM -0400, Logan Rathbone wrote:
With most any mailing list I've subscribed to, I've been able to use
the L shortcut to list-reply and the mailing list has been
auto-detected by mutt just fine.
However, with one list, which is managed by Google G
With most any mailing list I've subscribed to, I've been able to use the
L shortcut to list-reply and the mailing list has been auto-detected by
mutt just fine.
However, with one list, which is managed by Google Groups as I
understand, is not.
Here is the List-Post header, redact
On 2019-07-30, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
>> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to
>> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with
>> a simple keystroke.
>
> This. Having used s
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to
> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with
> a simple keystroke.
This. Having used slrn in the past, I was surprised mutt didn't have
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a fe
On Jul 30, 2019 at 7:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:
A solution must be based on some kind of a local "database" file of
threads marked as "bad" threads (perhaps as patterns) and one must
actively store the given "bad" thread into it, for example with M
and then a D would later, even in the next mutt
ad into it, for example with M and then a D would
> later, even in the next mutt session, read this "database" file and delete
> all threads from the actual mailbox for all patterns in it.
Useful remarks! Indeed a 100% solution *has* to pass from some kind
of database/list of good/bad threads. For not, marking a message
as "important" saves the thread (even if broken) from touch/delete;
this alleviates the pain in some cases.
-F
El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis
escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in
> > mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in
> mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this thread
> anymore, just collapse them and mark for deletion on exit".
>
> This is such a thre
On 05Jul2019 10:05, Cameron Simpson wrote:
It occurs to me now that if you want greater precision than:
! ~f discourse
you could make an address group and go:
! ~f %discourse
and maintain a small alias group thus:
alias -group discourse discourse \
Haskell Discourse List , \
Some Other
tain a small alias group thus:
alias -group discourse discourse \
Haskell Discourse List , \
Some Other Discourse List
I find groups quite handy, for example tuning for HTML vs plain text:
# prefer plain text
message-hook . 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/plain tex
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Maybe beef up the limit? Untested:
>
> folder-hook fa-ml 'push !~l | ~f discou...@haskell.org'
Indeed that is a simple and sensible solution. I post the actual pattern
I used here, for future reference:
folder-hook fa-ml 'pu
On 14Jun2019 08:05, Francesco Ariis wrote:
I recently joined a Discourse server and chose "Mailing List
mode" [1] to receive one mail per post.
This is mutt-friendly but alas I cannot seem to find a way to
`subscribe` to Discourse like I would with a normal mailing list
(e.g.
Hello mutters,
I recently joined a Discourse server and chose "Mailing List
mode" [1] to receive one mail per post.
This is mutt-friendly but alas I cannot seem to find a way to
`subscribe` to Discourse like I would with a normal mailing list
(e.g. `subscribe discou...@haskell.org`)
gt; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
> course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the
> prompt.
I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list.
t; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
> > course I can't get past without first entering a folder at
> > the
> > prompt.
>
> I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
> for the mailbox name, '?
ut first entering a folder at the
> prompt.
I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list. What am I missing? That
sounds like what you want.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._
Hi
if i have a mail selected in the index and want to save and then be prompted to
select one of my mailboxes, how can this be done?
my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the
prompt.
thanks,
--
Ben Fitzgerald
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:58:31PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to
> > reply to the mailing list. All great.
>
> In fact the "lists" command
On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote:
> when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to
> reply to the mailing list. All great.
In fact the "lists" command is not relevant or necessary for this. List
reply simply selects the address in the List-Post
Hi,
when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to
reply to the mailing list. All great.
When I select a folder for a given mailing list and then
want to mail the start of a new thread, simply hitting "m"
(bound to ) ought, in my mind, to auto-populate the
mail
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 08:09:21PM +0100, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues.
>
> The web archive for t
On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues.
I only noticed this now. As far as I can tell, it hasn't been mentioned
here yet: (I might have over
have an alias defined for it. I have aliases for all
the lists I'm subscribed to, made from the part of the address before
the '@'. EG alias mutt-users "Mutt Users" etc.
This is done automagically via a macro+shell script whenever I
subscribe to a new list, or unsubscribe and
rom the envelope sender?
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
On 07/24/2018 05:01 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 24.07.18 15:32, Hang Yuan wrote:
So sounds it's my email client's problem which can't show email header
correctly? I can see you email address but can't see my address
displayed in my reply. Instead, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org is showed.
You
On 24.07.18 15:32, Hang Yuan wrote:
> So sounds it's my email client's problem which can't show email header
> correctly? I can see you email address but can't see my address
> displayed in my reply. Instead, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org is showed.
Your post shows here as:
>From mutt-users-boun...
On 07/24/2018 01:48 PM, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:31:43PM +0800, Hang Yuan wrote:
On 07/24/2018 01:27 PM, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org wrote:
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from
mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see
On 07/24/2018 02:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2018-07-24 13:31, Hang Yuan wrote:
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email
from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email
address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the
rece
On 2018-07-24 13:31, Hang Yuan wrote:
> > I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email
> > from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email
> > address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the
> > received
On 07/24/2018 01:27 PM, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org wrote:
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from
mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address
like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the received email. If
I only sen
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from
mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address
like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the received email. If
I only send email to an individual, the email head is correct with
me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:00:59PM -0400, jr wrote:
> > There are lots of libraries for doing this in lots of languages (python,
> > go, perl, ). Using mutt would be harder
> > than needed for most tasks unless you don't know how to program at all.
>
> i was hoping for C. found libcmime but it'
On 08.05.18 20:46, Derek Martin wrote:
> I dare say no one should want to work in Perl anymore... It's such a
> horrible mishmash of a lanugage.
+1
> But C is probably not the best tool for this job either. Python has
> modules for handling e-mail and for talking to bugzilla, and for my
> money
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > i am looking for a library to parse email messages.
[...]
> What you want for bugzilla is probably
>
> https://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.0/html/api/email_in.html
>
> and you probably want to work in Perl.
I dare say no one should want
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM -0400, jrun wrote:
> >
> > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write
> > something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create b
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:09:42PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> On 08/05/18 20:21, jrun wrote:
> > ...posted this earlier on #neomutt...
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write
> > something
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM -0400, jrun wrote:
>
> i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write
> something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bugs in
> bugzilla out of them and possibly appending to the existing bug.
On 08/05/18 20:21, jrun wrote:
...posted this earlier on #neomutt...
hello,
i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write
something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bugs in
bugzilla out of them and possibly appending to the existing bug
...posted this earlier on #neomutt...
hello,
i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write
something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bugs in
bugzilla out of them and possibly appending to the existing bug. btw, how would
you do this? woul
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:56:05AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example,
> > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:17:22PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Tom Furie [04-20-18 18:54]:
> > The subscription file could be sourced by .muttrc. Of course, changes
> > won't be reflected until mutt is restarted.
> no, simply, :source will do it.
Okay, thank you. Of course that's also a
* Tom Furie [04-20-18 18:54]:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
>
> > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example,
> > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as
> >
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example,
> "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as
> subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe l...@address.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example,
> "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as
> subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe l...@address.
On 20Apr2018 22:46, Yubin Ruan wrote:
Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example,
"Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as
subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe l...@address.org' in .muttrc), such
that th
Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example,
"Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as
subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe l...@address.org' in .muttrc), such
that there is a 'L' flag showing up in the index?
Yubin
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:23:13AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
>:0
> * ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@(osuosl|mutt)\.org
>.mutt-users/
Thanks Will, I was hoping to get this back from my mail :)
--strk;
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> What I use for procmail (if anyone finds it useful):
>
> :0
> * ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@mutt.org
> .mutt-users/
>
> :0
> * ^List-Post: .*mutt-us...@osuosl.org
> .mutt-users/
Don't fo
> > > errant http://mutt.org/mailman) links. I think they have accidentally
> > > goofed up the list ids and headers in the process. I've let them know
> > > about the problem - sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > Replying to myself to check the headers. Ple
y
> > goofed up the list ids and headers in the process. I've let them know
> > about the problem - sorry for the confusion.
>
> Replying to myself to check the headers. Please pardon the noise.
well, FWIW, I just happened to have set procmail to use a header
that (so far)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:39:47PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> OSUOSL is making some adjustments to the lists right now (to fix the
> errant http://mutt.org/mailman) links. I think they have accidentally
> goofed up the list ids and headers in the process. I've let them kn
s need
> to be updated?
I already saw three different List-Id settings in the last two days now:
* mutt-users.mutt.org
* mutt-users.osuosl.org
* mutt-users.lists.mutt.org
I added all of those to my exim forward filter rules, but I would
appreciate if this could settle to some final value soon.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:29:10PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 13.03.18 08:31, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > On 12Mar2018 12:31, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> > > things that need to be t
On 13.03.18 08:31, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 12Mar2018 12:31, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues.
>
> I notice that the Sender: head
first
>> time ever, I received a few emails from this mailing list.
>
> Sorry about that. Yes, the 'nomail' and 'digest' options were lost, and
> I have no way to retrieve them. I'll have to ask for your forgiveness
> and request you manually re-enable thos
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:01:08PM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
> It looks like the "nomail" subscription setting was lost in this
> transition.
>
> I have been subscribed that way for some time and today, for the first
> time ever, I received a few emails from this mailin
On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a
> catastrophic failure.
>
> Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on
> moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more steps
On 12Mar2018 12:31, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a
catastrophic failure.
Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on
moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more steps
to transition
Hello Kevin,
thanks for the hard work.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:31:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues.
1. The listinfo URL
> http:/
Hi Everyone,
Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a
catastrophic failure.
Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on
moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more steps
to transition smoothly, but given the failure have
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 03:22:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> I am on a mailing list which has (presumably for historical reasons)
> two addresses. Sometimes messages arrive with *both* of the addresses
> in a format which mutt sees as the list address. Thus, when I use
>
I am on a mailing list which has (presumably for historical reasons)
two addresses. Sometimes messages arrive with *both* of the addresses
in a format which mutt sees as the list address. Thus, when I use
'List Reply' the outgoing E-Mail preserves the duplication and my
E-Mail t
On 2016-11-02, Mihail Konev wrote:
> What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
> dedicated folder?
I used to use procmail for this.
Now I use slrn and news.gmane.org instead.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Let'
On 02Nov2016 08:08, Mihail Konev wrote:
What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
dedicated folder?
Right now I'm using
folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To:
mailing-list\";s\Cu=mailing-list$"'
i.e. tag everythin
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:08:32AM +0500, Mihail Konev wrote:
Hi list,
What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
dedicated folder?
Right now I'm using
folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To:
mailing-list\";s\Cu=mailing-list$&q
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:08:32AM +0500, Mihail Konev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
> dedicated folder?
>
> Right now I'm using
>
> folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To:
> m
* Mihail Konev [11-01-16 23:15]:
> Hi list,
>
> What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
> dedicated folder?
I prefer procmail.
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Comm
Hi list,
What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a
dedicated folder?
Right now I'm using
folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To:
mailing-list\";s\Cu=mailing-list$"'
i.e. tag everything "To: mailing-list", the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:42:10PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
>> I don't know if this is relevant: the list is not a real list with
>> appropriate headers, and most of the people use poorly-designed MUA
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
> I don't know if this is relevant: the list is not a real list with
> appropriate headers, and most of the people use poorly-designed MUA
> (no Mail-Followup-To, etc.).
To be fair, Mail-Followup-To was never turned i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
> Thanks Ben, but I realize my question was not accurate. I am
> disappointed by having recipients in Cc when I use list-reply on my
> own messages (match alternates).
>
> Ex:
> - I am subscribed to a list (wit
Thanks Ben, but I realize my question was not accurate. I am
disappointed by having recipients in Cc when I use list-reply on my
own messages (match alternates).
Ex:
- I am subscribed to a list (with mutt's subscribe command),
- I have sent a message to A (not in the list), Cc the list and B
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:43:01AM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to reply to a subscribed list without anybody in copy?
> I often receive messages from someone not subscribed, then want to
> answer to the list only (and sometimes forget to remove the
Hello,
Is there a way to reply to a subscribed list without anybody in copy?
I often receive messages from someone not subscribed, then want to
answer to the list only (and sometimes forget to remove the people in
Cc).
--
Gabriel
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote:
> On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Thanks! I'll give gpgme a spin. I didn't find that much documentation,
> though. I only need to set
>
> crypt_use_gpgme
> crypt_use_pka
You only really need to set crypt_u
On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I think I see the problem. Mutt is using a fixed buffer of size 1024
> when expanding the %r parameter. I think when the system was designed,
> no one anticipated expanding 50+ keys in a single gpg invocation. :-)
Yes, I was suspecting something
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote:
> * stops at the third[**] key 74464897317CDA88 (length 16) and
> * passes a truncated version 74464897317CDA (length 14) to pgpewrap
>
> which then gives me a "gpg: skipped: Invalid user ID". The related pgp
> setting is
>
> se
crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com FECEC90758BB1D95
crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 866BAB720X7E9L98
Running this with mutt -d2, I see in the debug log that the list of
recipients is passed to pgpewrap, but truncated as follows (lines
broken):
[2016-07-26 14:49:12] mutt_pgp_command: /usr/lib
1 - 100 of 1503 matches
Mail list logo
