equence of what you say is that a >
> > > message will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in
> > > Bcc to
> > > > that list, even if you are subscribed to this list.
> > >
> > > Yes, I think that's right.
> > >
> >
On 28May2025 08:49, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:45 -0400):
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a
> message will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/18 23:45 -0400):
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
>
> > In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a message
> > will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in Bcc to
> > th
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:18:53PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
In my understanding, a consequence of what you say is that a message
will not be detected as coming from a list if it is sent in Bcc to
that list, even if you are subscribed to this list.
Yes, I think that's right.
O
Hello Kurt and a lot of gratitude for you re-visiting the topic and
apparently even taking the time to read Mutt's sources!
Kurt Hackenberg (2025/05/10 17:25 -0400):
> Sébastien, I'm sorry, I gave a bad answer back then, because I misunderstood
> Mutt's mailing list code. I
mailing list (with the L
flag).
At the beginning I thouhgt it was because the emails do not have the
expected List-* headers but they actually do:
List-Unsubscribe: <https://discuss.ocaml.org/email/unsubscribe/...>
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
List-ID: OCaml | Learning
List-A
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (2025/04/16 21:11 -0700):
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:35:32AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
> wrote:
>
> > Can I make this a feature request?
>
> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/499
Awesome, thanks!
Seb.
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:35:32AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> Can I make this a feature request?
https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/499
--
Ian
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:48:43PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
Still, as I mentionned in another thread, I am subscribed to a list to
which the posters send emails in Bcc and such emails are not recognized
as lists by Mutt although, ijust checked, they do have the List-Post
header.
I
Hello Kurt,
Many thanks for your precious feedback below!
There is definitely no List-Post header in the emails sent by Discourse.
It is actually a funny coincidence to receive your email on this today
because it's precisely today that I started to change my mind on the
idea that theproble
mailing list (with the L
flag).
At the beginning I thouhgt it was because the emails do not have the
expected List-* headers but they actually do:
List-Unsubscribe: <https://discuss.ocaml.org/email/unsubscribe/...>
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
List-ID: OCaml | Learning
List-A
In fact I also wish that mutt had at least an option to do like Gnus
> and indicate thread structure *only* by indentation, omitting the
> ASCII art.
Well I'd say, for me that would not be of more interest because, at list
in this case, I guess I am more interested in saving space on my
4
t; > thread. So Re is just for the same foolish systems that need the
> > tags in Subject because they can't tell it's a list thread.
> Well. I am blind and, the last time I tried enablign the thread
> support in Mutt it made the display very "graphical"
On 19Mar2025 15:57, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 19 Mar 2025 13:50 +0100, from sebastien.hinde...@ens-lyon.org (Sébastien
Hinderer):
List-Unsubscribe: <https://discuss.ocaml.org/email/unsubscribe/...>
List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
List-ID: OCaml | Learning
List-A
foolish systems that need the tags in Subject
> because they can't tell it's a list thread.
Well. I am blind and, the last time I tried enablign the thread support
in Mutt it made the display very "graphical", to render the tree
structure of a thread I think.
Although I can
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (2025/04/02 11:17 -0700):
> FWIW I feel any use of Bcc by a receiving MUA is broken, because it
> should never be there in the first place. And of course the sending
> software (whether the original sender or the list server) is broken
> for having left
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:23:00AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:52:51AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
> wrote:
[Some text about the Re: prefix in email Subject headers]
> Mutt has some builtin support for handling / cleaning that up IIRC, via
> the $reply_regex
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:52:51AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> But the thing is, in the course of following up with MUAs which
> implement replies differently, the tags can -- and do -- become
> intermixed with the Re prefix, and with the alternative prefixes in
> other langua
emacs with a specialized hand written mode. In
the mode hook I do various cleanups on the article, and one of them is
to clean the Subject header of the prefixed junk. Here I mean
especially the list tags like "[exim-user]" which I hate with a
passion, and I'm so grateful to the mut
No worries, it may very well be that I have not been clear enough.
Btw your subject field does not have the Re: at its beginning,
I find it surprising. :)
Seb.
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:23:38PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > FWIW I feel any use of Bcc by a receiving MUA is broken, because
> > it should never be there in the first place. And of course the
> > sending software (whether the original sender or the list server)
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 11:11:38PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > Short of rewriting the headers, not sure if there's a good fix for
> > the case where the list is BCCd, at least as things work now.
> Yeah that's where I am, too. Sure, rewriting the headers would m
do understand the problem. The manual says:
> >
> > %L If an address in the “To:” or “Cc:” header field matches an address
> > defined by the users subscribe” command, this displays "To
> > ", otherwise the same as %F.
> >
> > So my understanding is th
If an address in the “To:” or “Cc:” header field matches an address
> defined by the users subscribe” command, this displays "To
> ", otherwise the same as %F.
>
> So my understanding is that it's because the list was Bcc'ed that it
> doesn't work.
Makes sense
es an address
defined by the users subscribe” command, this displays "To
", otherwise the same as %F.
So my understanding is that it's because the list was Bcc'ed that it
doesn't work.
Worth noting is: as broken or inconsistent as it is, my currnet
configuraiton does wo
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:24:51PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Will Yardley (2025/03/31 23:15 -0700):
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:51:52AM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > > I notice that mutt does not identify a mailing list to which I am
> > > subscribed a
Will Yardley (2025/03/31 23:15 -0700):
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:51:52AM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> > I notice that mutt does not identify a mailing list to which I am
> > subscribed as expected.
> >
> > In Mutt's configuration, I used the co
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 07:51:52AM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> I notice that mutt does not identify a mailing list to which I am
> subscribed as expected.
>
> In Mutt's configuration, I used the content of the List-Post header as
> parameter of the subscribe command
Dear all,
I notice that mutt does not identify a mailing list to which I am
subscribed as expected.
In Mutt's configuration, I used the content of the List-Post header as
parameter of the subscribe command.
However, mutt does not display the 'L' flag I would like to see for
messa
Egg on my face again.
I had looked at the OSUOSL list on the archive page and saw no search
functionality hence the question when I went back and tried the MARC
list search is available and again I look foolish.
Sorry for the noise.
Be well,
Mike
--
The party in power is always the worst, and
Is there a way to search all of mutt-users list messages?
Thanks,
Mike
--
The party in power is always the worst, and every man looks good until
he is elected.
- Will Rogers
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:04:13AM -0500, mikemcclain...@att.net wrote:
> When I was with frontier.com I wrote a little script that would
> rewrite 'from' and 'envelope_from_address' in .muttrc and it worked
> fine when I wanted to change those addresses on the fly.
> Frontier canceled me and I sig
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:04:13AM -0500, mikemcclain...@att.net wrote:
> email addresses are *.att.net changing 'from' and
> 'envelope_from_address' in .muttrc breaks email sending since mutt
> insists that those must agree with 'smtp_url'.
This doesn't sound right. mutt should not care, it's ju
nother smtp provider?
I've not found a way to 'set listaddress' rather having to put
2 statements in .muttrc for each list, 'send-hook' and 'reply-hook'.
Is there such a macro I've not found? It sure would be helpful.
Be well,
Mike
--
Wisdom doesn't necessarily come with age.
Sometimes just shows up all by itself.
- Tom Wilson
splay an L for mailing list instead of
the + it currently and inaccurately displays for Discourse posts sent by
e-mail suggesting that these emails are addressed to me personnaly
whereas this is obviously not the case.
Ah, ok. I'm not using the "L" flag, instead I use the X-La
I also receive Discourse forum posts via email.
I don't make use of mutt's list stuff myself, so this advice may need
some adaption. Personally, I reply to all messages with "g"
(group-reply) and inspect the to/cc headers presented for correctness.
Note that Discourse me
Hey Cameron,
Many thanks for your contribution. Is I tried to explainin my original
message my issue is not with _responding_ to messages coming from
Discourse, but rather to not being able to identify them as such in the
index because I can't make Mutt display an L for mailing list inste
Il 19 marzo 2025 alle 19:51 Sébastien Hinderer ha scritto:
> I'm still considering reporting the issue at their accessiblity desk,
> because for me it is an accessibility issue (I am blind, that' I think
> why emails are so crucial for me).
Please do!
It is an important usability/accessibility is
Hey Francesco, many thanks!
Yeah I definitely did consider procmail, especially given that I used it
during several years.
At some point, though, I started to use Mutt's imap support and, as
weird as it may sound I tend to like this way of dealing with mails. I
really don't know what made me swit
to me (with a + flag) rather than coming from a mailing list (with the L
> flag).
You are not alone in your quest!
This is me asking for help six years ago:
https://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-users/Week-of-Mon-20190610/001057.html
> I'm wondering what would be the right
Hello Michael and many thanks for your super helpful response!
Michael Kjörling (2025/03/19 15:57 +):
> On 19 Mar 2025 13:50 +0100, from sebastien.hinde...@ens-lyon.org (Sébastien
> Hinderer):
> > List-Unsubscribe: <https://discuss.ocaml.org/email/unsubscribe/...>
> &g
On 19 Mar 2025 13:50 +0100, from sebastien.hinde...@ens-lyon.org (Sébastien
Hinderer):
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://discuss.ocaml.org/email/unsubscribe/...>
> List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
> List-ID: OCaml | Learning
> List-Archive:
> https:
Dear all,
I follow a discourse forum but with emails enabled as I am not
comfortable with its web interface.
For the moment, the emails I receive for forum posts appear as addressed
to me (with a + flag) rather than coming from a mailing list (with the L
flag).
At the beginning I thouhgt it was
On 13May2024 10:49, Joe Damato via Mutt-users wrote:
And now when I switch to the netdev directory within mutt (by pressing
c),
I can easily see any messages that mention my email address in any thread
on the list.
Late to the thread, and purely for interest: this is what I use for the
use is a folder hook:
>
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#folder-hook
Thanks that worked perfectly.
Just incase anyone stumbles on this thread later, here's what I ended up
doing in my muttrc to help manage email for the netdev kernel mailing
list with my gmail account:
1. My company uses gma
In days of yore (Sun, 12 May 2024), Joe Damato via Mutt-users thus quoth:
> I am subscribed to some high traffic email lists (linux kernel development
> stuff).
>
> There are two cases I am trying to deal with which are fairly similar:
>
> 1. I am subscribed to a maili
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 04:49:45PM -0700, Joe Damato via Mutt-users wrote:
A follow up question: is there a way to apply this to only specific
imap directories?
What you now want to use is a folder hook:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#folder-hook
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:13:47AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> Il 12 maggio 2024 alle 14:47 Joe Damato via Mutt-users ha scritto:
> > Is there any way to get mutt to highlight/colorize/mark or somehow
> > indicate to me messages which specifically have my email in the TO or CC
>
Hello Joe,
Il 12 maggio 2024 alle 14:47 Joe Damato via Mutt-users ha scritto:
> Is there any way to get mutt to highlight/colorize/mark or somehow
> indicate to me messages which specifically have my email in the TO or CC
> line so that I don't miss those?
This is what I do. First you add a score
similar:
1. I am subscribed to a mailing list. I start a thread (usually with git
send-email) on the list and other developers on the list reply via
"reply-all". Since they reply-all, their message will contain the
email list I am subscribed to and my personal email addres
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:25:57PM +0800, "Kevin J. McCarthy"
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> > I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command
> > which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases
> > is "debian"
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command
which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases
is "debian" and the email address in question does contain "+debian"
but that shouldn't matter.
Hi,
Someone recently emailed me. Technically it was a reply to an
old email of mine. Since then, a few emails have gone back and
forth between us. All of my outgoing mails to this one address
have had a Mail-Followup-To header added. I have no idea why.
The address isn't mentioned in any "subscrib
Hi Everyone,
Recently Gmail has started bouncing emails with any DKIM failures. One
source of these failures is the:
'Sender: Mutt-users '
header added by the mailing list.
I realize some of you may be filtering based on that header, but I'm
seeing a large number of boun
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:46:04PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> When is it useful to have a mailing list to which
> you are not subscribed "known"?
IIRC, the original purpose was mostly to setup the (not ever ratified as
a real standard, and not commonly used now) mail
While researching my response in another topic I came
across the "subscribe" list that I don't recall seeing
previously. I've been using the "lists" list for the
same purpose.
As I read it, "lists" items are known mailing lists
and possibly subscribed to
Il 05 febbraio 2021 alle 12:25 Will Yardley ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
> > What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the
> > subject line?
> >
> > For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly
> > fi
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
> What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the
> subject line?
>
> For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly
> filter them out.
Seems like that might be challenging - even if Mutt
What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the
subject line?
For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly
filter them out.
thanks
Alex
Hello meine,
Il 19 gennaio 2021 alle 20:31 meine ha scritto:
> hi,
>
> I want to share a short introduction as a new list member.
>
> Am a mutt user since about 10 years after discovering the beauty and
> power of using CLI. Maybe not a 'power user' knowing a
Welkom Meine!
Glad to hear you enjoy using mutt. If you have any questions, feel free to ask
here. If someone else has questions and you know (part of) the answer, your
input is greatly appreciated.
Kind regards,
Remco
hi,
I want to share a short introduction as a new list member.
Am a mutt user since about 10 years after discovering the beauty and
power of using CLI. Maybe not a 'power user' knowing all possibilities,
but just practical -- mutt is my email work horse.
I use mutt on FreeBSD, part
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:40:42PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
[snip]
This looks like an old bug in Mutt's List-Post parser. Feel free to
open a gitlab ticket. Regardless, I'll add to my todo list and make
sure this fix is in the next release.
I can certainly do that if it w
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:45:13PM -0400, Logan Rathbone wrote:
With most any mailing list I've subscribed to, I've been able to use
the L shortcut to list-reply and the mailing list has been
auto-detected by mutt just fine.
However, with one list, which is managed by Google G
With most any mailing list I've subscribed to, I've been able to use the
L shortcut to list-reply and the mailing list has been auto-detected by
mutt just fine.
However, with one list, which is managed by Google Groups as I
understand, is not.
Here is the List-Post header, redact
On 2019-07-30, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
>> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to
>> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with
>> a simple keystroke.
>
> This. Having used s
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to
> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with
> a simple keystroke.
This. Having used slrn in the past, I was surprised mutt didn't have
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a fe
On Jul 30, 2019 at 7:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:
A solution must be based on some kind of a local "database" file of
threads marked as "bad" threads (perhaps as patterns) and one must
actively store the given "bad" thread into it, for example with M
and then a D would later, even in the next mutt
ad into it, for example with M and then a D would
> later, even in the next mutt session, read this "database" file and delete
> all threads from the actual mailbox for all patterns in it.
Useful remarks! Indeed a 100% solution *has* to pass from some kind
of database/list of good/bad threads. For not, marking a message
as "important" saves the thread (even if broken) from touch/delete;
this alleviates the pain in some cases.
-F
El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis
escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in
> > mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in
> mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this thread
> anymore, just collapse them and mark for deletion on exit".
>
> This is such a thre
On 05Jul2019 10:05, Cameron Simpson wrote:
It occurs to me now that if you want greater precision than:
! ~f discourse
you could make an address group and go:
! ~f %discourse
and maintain a small alias group thus:
alias -group discourse discourse \
Haskell Discourse List , \
Some Other
tain a small alias group thus:
alias -group discourse discourse \
Haskell Discourse List , \
Some Other Discourse List
I find groups quite handy, for example tuning for HTML vs plain text:
# prefer plain text
message-hook . 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/plain tex
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Maybe beef up the limit? Untested:
>
> folder-hook fa-ml 'push !~l | ~f discou...@haskell.org'
Indeed that is a simple and sensible solution. I post the actual pattern
I used here, for future reference:
folder-hook fa-ml 'pu
On 14Jun2019 08:05, Francesco Ariis wrote:
I recently joined a Discourse server and chose "Mailing List
mode" [1] to receive one mail per post.
This is mutt-friendly but alas I cannot seem to find a way to
`subscribe` to Discourse like I would with a normal mailing list
(e.g.
Hello mutters,
I recently joined a Discourse server and chose "Mailing List
mode" [1] to receive one mail per post.
This is mutt-friendly but alas I cannot seem to find a way to
`subscribe` to Discourse like I would with a normal mailing list
(e.g. `subscribe discou...@haskell.org`)
gt; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
> course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the
> prompt.
I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list.
t; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
> > course I can't get past without first entering a folder at
> > the
> > prompt.
>
> I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
> for the mailbox name, '?
ut first entering a folder at the
> prompt.
I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me
for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list. What am I missing? That
sounds like what you want.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._
Hi
if i have a mail selected in the index and want to save and then be prompted to
select one of my mailboxes, how can this be done?
my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of
course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the
prompt.
thanks,
--
Ben Fitzgerald
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:58:31PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to
> > reply to the mailing list. All great.
>
> In fact the "lists" command
On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote:
> when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to
> reply to the mailing list. All great.
In fact the "lists" command is not relevant or necessary for this. List
reply simply selects the address in the List-Post
Hi,
when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to
reply to the mailing list. All great.
When I select a folder for a given mailing list and then
want to mail the start of a new thread, simply hitting "m"
(bound to ) ought, in my mind, to auto-populate the
mail
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 08:09:21PM +0100, Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues.
>
> The web archive for t
On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few
> things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues.
I only noticed this now. As far as I can tell, it hasn't been mentioned
here yet: (I might have over
have an alias defined for it. I have aliases for all
the lists I'm subscribed to, made from the part of the address before
the '@'. EG alias mutt-users "Mutt Users" etc.
This is done automagically via a macro+shell script whenever I
subscribe to a new list, or unsubscribe and
rom the envelope sender?
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
On 07/24/2018 05:01 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 24.07.18 15:32, Hang Yuan wrote:
So sounds it's my email client's problem which can't show email header
correctly? I can see you email address but can't see my address
displayed in my reply. Instead, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org is showed.
You
On 24.07.18 15:32, Hang Yuan wrote:
> So sounds it's my email client's problem which can't show email header
> correctly? I can see you email address but can't see my address
> displayed in my reply. Instead, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org is showed.
Your post shows here as:
>From mutt-users-boun...
On 07/24/2018 01:48 PM, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:31:43PM +0800, Hang Yuan wrote:
On 07/24/2018 01:27 PM, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org wrote:
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from
mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see
On 07/24/2018 02:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2018-07-24 13:31, Hang Yuan wrote:
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email
from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email
address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the
rece
On 2018-07-24 13:31, Hang Yuan wrote:
> > I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email
> > from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email
> > address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the
> > received
On 07/24/2018 01:27 PM, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org wrote:
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from
mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address
like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the received email. If
I only sen
I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from
mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address
like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the received email. If
I only send email to an individual, the email head is correct with
me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:00:59PM -0400, jr wrote:
> > There are lots of libraries for doing this in lots of languages (python,
> > go, perl, ). Using mutt would be harder
> > than needed for most tasks unless you don't know how to program at all.
>
> i was hoping for C. found libcmime but it'
On 08.05.18 20:46, Derek Martin wrote:
> I dare say no one should want to work in Perl anymore... It's such a
> horrible mishmash of a lanugage.
+1
> But C is probably not the best tool for this job either. Python has
> modules for handling e-mail and for talking to bugzilla, and for my
> money
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > i am looking for a library to parse email messages.
[...]
> What you want for bugzilla is probably
>
> https://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.0/html/api/email_in.html
>
> and you probably want to work in Perl.
I dare say no one should want
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM -0400, jrun wrote:
> >
> > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write
> > something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create b
1 - 100 of 1546 matches
Mail list logo
