googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (2025/04/05 10:35 -0700): > I have accessibility issues of my own, so I definitely get your point > and I'll think hard about it.
Thanks! > (This article has the conventional prefix > by a special dispensation.) And thanks for that, too. > In fact I also wish that mutt had at least an option to do like Gnus > and indicate thread structure *only* by indentation, omitting the > ASCII art. Well I'd say, for me that would not be of more interest because, at list in this case, I guess I am more interested in saving space on my 40-cells braille display than on the ability to perceive the tree-structure of a thread, which would be time-consuming to grasp. As far as I am myself concerned, the ability to have the thread manipulation commands without this involving any specific change on the display would be my own best of both worlds, I think. > Right now I have a workaround, namely using really low > contrast attributes for those characters, but I understand that might > not help you. I don't think it does, indeed. Do you value the indentation? I guess so. > Can I make this a feature request? Sure, thanks for picking up the topic. FWIW Mutt already has a braille_friendly variable. A presentation with no indentation could be conditionned to this variable being set. Perhaps it would be possible to add another boolean variable representing whether the structure is rendered with ascii-art or with indentation but I cannot come up with an elegant name right now. Seb.
