googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org (2025/04/03 09:52 -0700): > > Btw your subject field does not have the Re: at its beginning, > > I find it surprising. :) > > Right, I know. This is a long story and not very mutt related > but I think the traffic will allow for it :)
Thanks for having taken the time to explain! [...] > And to think of it, I'm starting to feel the same about Re and its > siblings as I do about the tags. With any decent MUA you know that the > article is a reply or followup by its position in the thread. So Re is > just for the same foolish systems that need the tags in Subject > because they can't tell it's a list thread. Well. I am blind and, the last time I tried enablign the thread support in Mutt it made the display very "graphical", to render the tree structure of a thread I think. Although I can certainly see the value of such a rendering for sighted users, in my case I must say it made everything rather messy and I had to renounce to it, in spite of my interest for the feature. So, TBH I do miss the "Re: " prefix in your messages. And, this was another topic I wanted to discuss anyway: is there a way to enable threads commands but not the thread display? Best wishes, Seb.
