Hello Michael and many thanks for your super helpful response! Michael Kjörling (2025/03/19 15:57 +0000): > On 19 Mar 2025 13:50 +0100, from sebastien.hinde...@ens-lyon.org (Sébastien > Hinderer): > > List-Unsubscribe: <https://discuss.ocaml.org/email/unsubscribe/...> > > List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click > > List-ID: OCaml | Learning <learning.discuss.ocaml.org> > > List-Archive: > > https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/collaboration-on-ocaml-project-1-claudius-outreachy/16325 > > Those headers do not appear to conform to RFC 2369 and RFC 2919. > Specifically, List-Unsubscribe appears to me to be correct (compare > RFC 2369 3.2 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2369#section-3.2>) > whereas the others do not appear to match the syntax specified in the > RFC.
That's certainly a point worth reporting to Discourse people, thanks! > I don't know how strict Mutt is about this, and you don't show the > relevant subscribe/lists command (note that those take regular > expressions, so a bare '+' would at a minimum need to be escaped; > <http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#lists>), so it's hard to tell from > your email exactly what's going on. Well I had many obscurations on this, sorry about that. Before today I was under the false belief that these emails didn't have any List related headers at all. I went as far as starting to report the problem and only then it occurred to me that I should verify. The second bit I was missing was that I could use regular expressions as arguemnts of the lists and sbuscribe commands. And I expected each topic would yield its own "list", so that subscribing to or unsubscribing from a topic would map well to the equivalent list counterparts. But as can be seen from what i showed, the granularity of the lists is by category, for instance learning as shown here, or ecosystem or others. I did try :subscribe learning.discuss.ocaml.org before opening the mailbox where all these emails are but the L was not there. Thanks again, Seb.
